Tuesday, August 19, 2014

Occupy Fergurson is nothing even remotely similar to the 1960's Civil Rights movement.

A difference between night and day. 

When I look at the ghetto trash stinking up Fergurson, I just laugh when foolish blacks dare to compare this open display of destruction, looting and anarchy to the peaceful, dignified civil rights protest by blacks of the 1960's. There is no compassion. What's going on in Fergurson Missouri is pure chaos. If anything, Fergurson has become the new home for the reincarnation of the Occupy movement. What's going on in Fergurson has far more to do with the race agitators, anarchists,  vandals and looters then it does about supposedly wanting justice for Michael Brown. I doubt that blacks mainly young blacks have no idea how bad they are appearing to the rest of the nation in how they are carrying on in Fergurson. I would love to see a national poll conducted gauging how the nation is viewing what's going on in Fergurson Missouri as either positive or negative. The Occupy movement started out positive for minute also . People supported their original cause of bring attention to the greed and abuse of Wall Street and the financial system, but after awhile, they lost focus of what they were doing, and their movement became a breeding ground of crime, drug use, vandalism, theft and violence. When they lost the support of the public, they quickly fell apart completely and disappeared. What's going on in Fergurson is no different. People across the county are asking themselves, why are these people acting like animals. They aren't sure what vandalizing and looting stores have to do with seeking justice for Michael Brown. Tthey would be correct in asking that question. Both have nothing in common. These people are acting out in self interest only, it has nothing to do with Michael Brown. Here's a question to ponder. How can all of these malcontents be rioting, looting and vandalizing on a nightly basis yet still hold down a job? Oh wait, is it strongly possible that none of them have jobs the reason they can be doing what they are doing in Fergurson? Fox News interviewed one of the these fine upstanding and concerned protesters in Fergurson. The dignity and class of  the black generation from the civil rights era is definitely not present in this generation of blacks.

From the dignified generation to the ghetto acting generation. Acts like this are truly helping to bring attention to Michael Brown's death right?

MSNBC in it's coverage has shown it's sympathetic in favor of Michael Brown, but even they aren't immune to the wrath of the mob. Just ask Chris Hayes and his cameraman. Ironic that the animals are attacking their ally. Throwing stones at Chris Hayes and his cameraman helps to bring attention to Michael Brown's death how again?

Wednesday, August 13, 2014

Micheal Brown's death has value to the black community for one specific reason.

The racial dinner bell has been rung in Fergurson Missouri, and the black racists and the self victimized black grievance folks have come running. Looks like Eric Garner has become yesterday's news in the eyes of the black agitators. The newest member of the black person's death who has value club is Michael Brown. This is a very exclusive club to be a member of.  Current members are Trayvon Martin, Eric Garner to name a few. The main perk of being a member of this club is that black people actually act like they care that you were killed. The only stipulation to be a member is that a black person has to be killed by a white person mainly a cop. Unfortunately if you are black and are killed by another black person, it doesn't count. It's not a bad deal, when you think about it. If you are black and are killed by someone who is white, the national media will immediately champion your death. You'll get a special guest appearance by either Jesse Jackson but mainly Al Sharpton. Blacks will protest in your honor etc. Now if you are killed by another black person, you'll still be mourned, but it wil only be by your immediate family and friends. Some may be asking am I being sarcastic or am I being absurd. Actually I'm being honest. The macro problem facing blacks is other blacks not white cops. I'm not sure what was the situation surrounding the shooting death of Michael Brown, the facts will come out in due time. The racial agitators who have ascended onto Fergurson like vultures eying to pick a any scraps they can find aren't going to help this process on bit, if anything they are gong to hinder it.

Saturday, August 02, 2014

Here we go again. The Death of Eric Garner

I've following the case of the  Eric Garner. He's a 43 year old black man who died after being subdued by  the  New York Police Department. The reason I've been following this story is frankly due to me not having no other choice. It's been all over the news both locally and nationally. In sarcasm, I wonder why.  Of course there are two factors that usually make a cop involved death of a suspect go national in the media. The first factor is that the victim has to be black, and the second factor is that the cop has to be white. From what I understand from watching the news so far, Eric Garner was selling cigarettes in New York on the street and was subdued by the NYPD. It hasn't taken long (surprise) for the racial agitators like Al Sharpton to position themselves into this story into what went wrong that led to Eric Garner's death . I'm not going to go deep into this, because most people more then likely already know about it the story. What I will say is this. At this time, there appears that there was no racial motive behind the apprehension of Mr Garner. According to the Corner's office report by Julie Bolcer Mr. Garner was killed in part to neck compressions from a choke hold administered by one of the officers as well as chest and prone positioning during his apprehension. The officer who issued the choke hold on Mr. Garner was officer Daniel Pantelo. The NYPD said that they have removed his gun and badge. Notice that I said that Eric Garner was killed " in part" due to the choke hold and his positioning. None of that is to be ignored of course, but what will likely be ignored by the media and the race hustlers is the following in the Corner's report.

 "Asthma, heart disease and obesity were "contributing factors" in his death". Mr. Garner was 6 foot tall and weighed 350 pounds."

 Again, I want to make myself perfectly clear. I am not excusing how the NYPD handled the arrest of Mr Garner, because I'm not. What I am saying is that the vultures who have sensationalized this case are going to gloss over the medical condition of Mr Garner prior to his death.  Should the officers be punished if they didn't follow proper apprehension procedure? The answer is of course. I dont't believe anyone with common sense would disagree with that. What I don't want to see is this case being racially sensationalized. I don't know the statistics, but I wonder how many times has Al Sharpton shown his head, when a black person was killed while being subdued by a black police officer? Since blacks killing black (which is by far more way more common) doesn't grab the news headlines, I guess their lives aren't that important. Funny I would say that, because  I said the exact same thing during the Trayvon Martin irrational  freak show behavior circus. This is starting to resemble that unfortunately. This is the recipe.

1.Mix in one  part irrational thinking people who are racially motivated people "mainly black"
2. Sprinkle in the racial element of the victim and suspect(s) 
3. Add the media and racial agitators
4. Then stir

and this is what you will get. Again it appears that the only time the life of a black person has value is, when the life is taken by a person who isn't black. Other then that, it's just business as usual. The race hustling poverty pimp Al Sharpton said to Mayor DeBlasio this is going to  be

 "a real test of Mayor Bill  de Blasio's pledge to bridge the gap between police and minority communities."

 Not to excuse cops for overreacting at times, but I have to ask this question. How many blacks die in either police custody each year compared to blacks who are killed by other blacks across America? I would really like to know the ratio of that. My thinking is that it is easier to focus on incidents that rarely happen rather then it is to focus on an issue that is out of control like black on black genocide. This is what I meant by irrational thinking people who are racially motivated in their ignorance.

This is what it has come to. Just like with Trayvon Martin, little kids are being exploited by their ignorant racially obsessed parents. The sign that little kid is holding makes me sigh in pity. I can excuse the kid, he doesn't know better, but the mother who is making him hold that sign is too stupd to realize that her son has a far greater chance of dying due to another black person's gun then he is by that of the gun of a cop. The sign she is holding reads "stop killing our men". Again, another exhibition of sheer stupidity. The problem in America isn't the cops killing black men. IT'S BLACK MEN KILLING OTHER BLACK MEN!!If the lives of black people mater specifically that of young black men, why is it that the only times signs like this and blacks who say such things happen, when a black person dies in an incident that rarely happens?

Thursday, July 24, 2014

Foreigners who come to America don't see themselves as victims, that is why they get ahead.

Many blacks hold a resentment towards foreigners who come to the United States and end up becoming far more successful then they have. About twelve years ago, I use to work with a guy who immigrated here from Nigeria. Me and him got into a conversation one day, because this guy use to work 12 hour days constantly.  So I asked him why is it that he worked so hard. He told me that he wasn't afraid of hard work. He told me that back in Nigeria, he use to work harder then he did now. He said he came to the United States to better his life. I was amazed at what he told next. In the short period of time he was in the country which was about four years, he managed to buy a Mercedes and own three cabs with people driving for him. All the money he made he sent back home to Nigeria for his family. He had little respect for many blacks who were born here he told me, He told me point blank that he believed that a lot of blacks were complainers and were lazy but wanted everything handed to them, and it was crazy that he was able to come to this country and could barely speak English, yet he was more successful then blacks who were born into the opportunity this country provides. To this day, I've never forgotten what he said. He was right. Many blacks who were born as American citizens waste their lives blaming foreigners and whites for their short comings. I can honestly say that I've never hear of African immigrants in the United States claiming that. It's like I've always said. When you are taught that you are life's victim due to the color of your skin, why would you dare try to elevate yourself in life, what's the point right? Those who black and were never taught that don't have that victimization mindset, so they simply go out and succeed at life. This video I came across proves that perfectly. This exchanged happened about three years ago, but it's still relevant to this day.  A self victimized black woman went into a convenience store and got into a heated arrangement with the owners of the store (who were African). The black lady for some reason didn't want to  hear that the owners were from Africa. She was angry that they were in the United States and thought somehow they were stealing opportunities from blacks.

Wednesday, July 16, 2014

Progressive intolerance in the name of tolerance?

Liberalism and tolerance goes together like vampires and garlic. Progressives have been known to act in the hate filled manner they claim the right represents for decades. I discovered just how intolerant the left can be when Clarance Thomas was being confirmed by the U.S Senate for a seat on the Supreme Court. I didn't even know who the man was, but one thing that stood out during the process was how the left racially attacked him for no good reason. They called him an Uncle Tom, said that he wasn't black, he was an Oreo etc. The words he was called didn't make sense to me back then. I asked those who attacked this man, why did they refer to him as a "trader to his race". Of course, they couldn't answer that question. As I became more politically active, my thoughts about the left became more clear that these people who champion themselves as the advocates for tolerance, compassion and diversity are anything but what they claim. This is how liberals portrayed Joseph Lieberman  when he ran for re election against fellow liberal Ned Lemont in 2006. Joe was under attack due to his support of the Iraq War and support of George Bush on the issue. So a supporter of Lamont doctored a photo of Lieberman (in black face) standing next to Bill Clinton.

Of course liberals just dismissed this, because they just hid behind the lame excuse that they couldn't be racist or bigoted due to them being liberals.  When black conservative Ken Blackwell ran for Governor of Ohio, the left didn't take too kindly to that.

 When Michael Steele ran for Governor here in Maryland,  the left portrayed him as a "sambo", "minstrel". When he became the first black chairman of the Republican National Committee, the left wasn't interested in his historic achievement as a black man.

 As you can see, there is a clear pattern to the left's intolerance to those who are not white and are conservative or even moderate like in the case of Joe Lieberman. Frankly, I didn't even come close to remotely scratching the surface. I will however present one more person that the left has an issue with. She's a black woman who in the left's eye doesn't know here role so to speak. Glo Smith is running for congress in the Florida 5th congressional district. One would think that elections should be won or lost on the issues. A person's skin color shouldn't be an issue, well if that candidate isn't white and is conservative of course the left is going to make it an issue every time. This is a picture of Glo Smith speaking at one of her political events
This is how the left portrayed Ms. Glo as a black female for daring to have diverse points of views that aren't shared by liberals.

 Now of course all liberals aren't racially hard wired like this, but the ones who aren't are fraudulent, when it comes to pointing their fingers at the right and shouting racism. Those on the left who truly embrace diversity including ideological diversity needs to ask themselves why other liberals feel that minorities are suppose to embrace their views exclusively or else. As a conservative who is black, I welcome other blacks who chose to be conservatives, liberals, moderates, democrats, republicans, libertarians, green party or constitutional party members or simply chose to be unaffiliated. Why do some liberals act out in a racial manner? Do they realize that every time they racially attack blacks for doing nothing more then opposing them on policies, they are making themselves out to be the real racists they claim the right is? I remember some on the left calling Condi Rice an "Aunt Jemimah". I've asked liberals who called her this how does a a woman who was a child prodigy, who holds a Doctorate Degree, speaks 3 languages fluently,  plays classical piano, was the former Secretary of State and National Security Adviser and is a college professor be compared to a fictional maid like black woman on a bottle of syrup. As you may have guessed, I have yet to get an answer.

Wednesday, July 02, 2014

White Privilege and the indoctrination of American kids.

 I've been hearing this buzz term for awhile now. What exactly is "white privilege"? I suppose liberals would say that white privilege is something about whites in America who are privileged to have certain advantages because of the color of their skin. Well if that's the case, then from a progressive stand point naturally they are going to believe the flip side of that claim, that minorities are the inherit victims of "white privilege". As with progressive logic, minorities and blacks will always be life's victims due to whites somehow having it better then them. Of course that line of thinking is beyond stupid and irrational.  Then again, if you are a progressive and your job is to convince blacks that their life sucking isn't their fault, then this is a perfect excuse to use. I was driving yesterday here in Baltimore, and I pulled up to an intersection. A homeless guy was walking the cement walkway divider looking for motorists to give him change. The guy was white. As I observed this guy asking for change I thought if white privilege is real, why is this guy homeless and begging for change? I've seen other homeless people who are white and are homeless, and that question never escapes me. On the flip side, there are blacks in this country who are very well off financially and in some cases are millionaires and even billionaires. So how did that happen? Dr Dre the rapper just recently sold his Beats Audio headphone company to Apple for I believe two billion dollars. Is that a sample of "black privilege"? What about Oprah who is considered the most powerful woman in media, well Oprah is black. Now I know some will say that I am naming entertainers, but my point is that the myth of white privilege is just that, a myth. Tell that to liberals though, and they will swear up and down that your are either a racist or out of touch  Liberals are so engulfed into this insanity, they even have an annual "white privilege conference" to talk about how to combat "white privilege" in America. h/t to progressives today.com for shedding a light on how liberals are indoctrinating kids to believe such insanity.

It has been said the liberalism is a mental disorder. There is little doubt that it is.  This just shows that liberals have no idea what real racism is. Some of these kooks actually believe they are inherently racists simply for being born white. That is as mental as thinking that a person is destined to be drug user, dealer or criminal, because he was born black. Of course this is obvious brainwashing of kids. No wonder so many of them are growing up to be such mind numbed robots voided of being able to use analytical thinking. They are being programmed at very young ages to think this dribble as witnessed in at the White Privilege Conference. If I was to have brought up this topic, liberals would have just claimed I was making this stuff up, well let them argue with the facts now.This is obviously real and is most definitely happening. It's foolishness like this is a reason why the federal "Common Core" educational curriculum has been rejected by so many school systems via the backlash of parents from across the country, because they reject the social justice ideological BS which is the framework of it. So much for the days when educators were in trusted to just teach the children about reading, writing and math and science. The White Privilege Conference just verifies what I said about how liberals see blacks as being poor, pathetic down trodden victims. It's not their fault for anything. It's the fault of "the man". This type of thinking is also known as "White Guilt". If these ding bat liberals feel so bad for being born white, they can always jump off the nearest overpass and call it a day. Nah, no such luck. I've been called many derogatory names by the left, because I see through their warped minded  insanity thus never seeing myself as a victim of "white privilege", because I never was. I would love for an "intelligent" liberal to tell me how I was and am. Good luck in that happening I now. While other countries are teaching their children advanced mathematics and science, kids in the United States are being brainwashed about "social justice" and white guilt. Gee, I wonder what nation is economically going to be better off in the long run? (sarcasm). I came across a beautiful video by a lady named Stacey On The Right in response to the 2014 White Privilege aka White Guilt Conference that just ended a few weeks ago. She nailed it perfectly.

Wednesday, June 25, 2014

Hispanics aren't nothing like blacks politically.

White liberals are some very stupid people. I'm not saying this, because I am opposed to just about everything they stand for. I'm saying this, because it's the truth. These people have this warped concept of how the world should be, and they are determined to make it so. They also have to tendency to think that things will work out according to their way of thinking, and that will lead to their down fall. There is no denying that most blacks follow the lead of white progressives hook line and sinker. They are for the most part the ultimate useful idiots. It is what it is.

They have been indoctrinated or trained to believe that white liberals are somehow "not white" yet white conservatives are and that makes them all racists because of it.

I never said liberal logic had to make sense. White liberals know they have to vast bulk of the "black vote", and they never have to fear blacks becoming a political dominating force that will rise up and take away their power. Hispanics on the other hand are a different story entirely. Hispanics in this country both legal and illegal aren't like blacks. For one thing, Hispanics don't abort off their own like blacks do thus their population will continue to grow. Another thing and probably the most important thing is that Hispanics are very politically aware as to their influence in politics by both parties. Since blacks are deemed owned or property by the Democratic Party exclusively, they really do not have any political capital. The Democratic Party knows that blacks will never leave them no matter what which means that the party knows they do not have to do anything for them so they can be taking for granted. I've been listening to some of the militant Hispanic leaders over the years from groups like CASA, and their agenda is one that could ultimately make white liberals a minority within the Democratic Party which I wouldn't really wouldn't care if it happened. There are Hispanic Democrats and leaders who are openly against white Democrats winning congressional seats in their districts. As their population continues to grow this will start to be a problem for white Democrats aka "anglos". For example, In New Mexico running for state delegate, Frank Otero sought the help of State Representative Miguel Garcia who is a Hispanic Democrat in Albuquerque. Miguel decided to help Mr. Otero. So Miguel sent out an email to other Democratic House, Senate and other elected Officials.. The Gracia email stated 

" A minority of unsuspecting Democratic leaders are supporting the Democratic ANGLO newcomer opponents in Andrews and Frank's primary races".

So I guess this was a case of a racist Hispanic Democrat attacking white Democrats., gee go figure. I know some will claim this was just an isolated issue, but I know it's not. Liberals think they will control the Hispanic vote like they do the black vote. They are dreaming if they think that will be the case.