Barack Obama didn't want to be overshadowed by the legend in Berlin.

Leaders from around the world are in Berlin to celebrate the fall of the Berlin Wall which lead to the reunification between East and West Germany. One would think that the 20th anniversary would be an historic event worthy of the leader of the United States to attend. Barack Obama thought differently. It seems that the thoughts of a government run health care bill is more important to him then celebrating one of the greatest moments of freedom witnessed by the world. It goes deeper then that actually. In Obama's mind, everything has to revolve around him. Obama doesn't like to share the spotlight with anyone. Obama didn't want to go and celebrate on the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin wall simply, because the legacy of former President Ronald Reagan would overshadow Obama's presence. When people think of the falling of the Berlin Wall, they naturally think of Ronald Reagan. The falling of the Berlin Wall was one of President Reagan's greatest legacies. Barack Obama doesn't have a legacy. Schools have been renamed after Obama, children have been brainwashed to sing his praises, Obama was even awarded a Noble Peace Prize, but Obama knows deep down that he hasn't done nothing of merit to warrant any of his praise other then the fact that he is the first black person to be elected President of the United States. Let me put it another way. Ronald Reagan was praised based on his historic actions such as playing a major role in the collapse of the Berlin Wall and ending the Cold War with Russia. Obama is being praised based on the color of his skin. There is no comparison between the two. I know some people on the left are going to go rabbit once they read this. Great presidents are known for their deeds. Once again, it is what it is. Obama didn't want to go to Germany and be reminded that he isn't as great or historic as his supporters have made him out to be. Speaking of historic, here's the words from a man who became a legend on the world stage based on his actual deeds.



It's amazing what words can accomplish when they come from a strong leader.



If President Ronald Reagan was alive today to hear Barack Obama speak, I can imagine what he would tell him.

Pelosi's Socialist Health care bill passed the House.

The trojan horse beast passes the House. Once again, so much for the bill being posted online so Americans could read the bill before it was voted on. The slogan "thiefs in the night" is extremely appropriate in describing Nancy Pelosi and the Democrat hordes that voted alongside her. The final vote was 220 in favor and 215 against. One self serving Republican voted in favor of the monster bill. Republican Joseph Cao from Louisiana was the sole Republican to cross the aisle and support this horrendous bill. Cao more then likely voted in favor of the bill, because his district is hugely Democrat and was the district that was formerly represented by William Jefferson. It doesn't matter the reason, Joseph Cao needs to be added to the 2010 midterm hit list. 39 Democrats joined the 176 Republicans in opposing this dangerous bill. Nancy Pelosi "likened the legislation to the passage of Social Security in 1935 and Medicare 30 years later". Here's a funny fact about the liberals most celebrated and worshiped social dependency programs. Those programs are all BROKE and have yet to work! Their programs are adding hundreds of billions of dollars to the national debt and hurting America, yet these mental clowns actually believe that these programs are "good for America". I truly despise Nancy Pelosi. If the 48% of Americans that didn't vote for Obama wouldn't have to suffer the consequences of this terrible bill, I would say let the 52% suffer from their own ignorance. Unfortunately, that isn't going to be the case. If this bill isn't stopped in the Senate, people who exercise common sense are going to have to suffer right along side the clueless slap happy liberal drones. Anybody with a brain knows that the public option is nothing more then a poison pill to kill off private insurers thus leaving the government as the sole provider once the dust settles. In the House bill that nobody read
"it would require most Americans to carry insurance and provide federal subsidies to those who otherwise could not afford it". In other words, the government will take away a person's freedom of choice and demand they obey what they say or else. Here's another scary provision of the bill the nobody read before it was voted on, "Both consumers and companies would be slapped with penalties if they defied the government's mandates". This is how the government is going to snuff out private insurers and become the only game in town.

"Insurance industry practices such as denying coverage on the basis of pre-existing medical conditions would be banned, and insurers would no longer be able to charge higher premiums on the basis of gender or medical history. In a further slap, the industry would lose its exemption from federal antitrust restrictions on price gouging, bid rigging and market allocation."

The government can lose all the money it wants covering pre-existing medical conditions and not raising premiums to offset the costs, because they can just print money. Private insurers don't have that "option". Can we say "unfair competition"? The claim about the government providing "choice and competition" is a bold faced lie. If the New York Yankees went to compete against a high school baseball team, how can the high school team compete against the Yankees? This bill if signed by Obama will cripple private insurers. That is what liberals wanted all along. No one read the bill. Liberals want to take over one-sixth of the American economy, drive the country deeper into debt, take more personal freedoms away from citizens just so they can emulate the Canadian Health Care system? This is what they admire?!



If Doctors can't charge for their services, what is the incentive for them to practice medicine? If Doctors drop out of practicing medicine, would that not create shortages among doctors using the simple principal of supply and demand?



Liberals are harmful to the health of Americans. I do agree with Barack Obama in something he said today.

Obama said "Democrats have a 70-year history of creating and defending programs like Social Security and Medicare". Obama also said that today's vote "is going to define the difference between the Republican and Democratic parties for decades."

He couldn't be more right but not in the way he thinks the American people will define the two parties after this vote and if he signs the bill into law. The vast majority of the polls show that Americans do not support this bill or socialized medicine period. Democrats do defend social dependency programs that keep people in need, grows the size of government and adds more debt onto backs of future generation. Is that something for liberals to really be proud of?

Nancy Pelosi won't allow for the 2,000+ page Socialist Healthcare bill to be posted on line before it is voted on.

Big surprise right? I remember just like it was yesterday, when Nancy Pelosi talked about leading the most honest, the most "open" and most ethical congress in American history.



Pelosi promised to allow for a 72-hour waiting period between posting health care legislation online and a final vote on the bill. FYI, the final vote in the house is scheduled for tonight, and it isn't online. Pelosi is like most if not all political elites, they feel they don't have to live up to the words they promise others. The only people they feel they are accountable to are themselves.

Is it really outrageous to compare Barack Obama to Adolph Hitler or a Nazi?

When the words Nazi and Hitler have been used by some on the right to describe Obama's policies, the left has gone insane with their fake outrage and disgust. I know many liberals suffer from brain damage either chemically induced or by being dropped on their heads when they were very young. Be that as it may, I can't believe that their short term memories have eroded so fast in such a short period of time. Have liberals really forgotten the words they've called the former resident of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue George W Bush?



Nah, it must have just been my imagination right?



This guy shouldn't bother trying out for America Got Talent, but he did prove that liberals are crying crocodile tears and are enormous hypocrites when they say it is mean spirited to refer to Obama as Hitler or a Nazi.

And the peaceful Muslim yelled "Allāhu Akbar" and the rest is history.

I got into a discussion yesterday on the issue of gay marriage. A half wit at best brought up scripture from the old testament that promoted violence. Another person chimed in and brought up the name of Timothy McVeigh. I guess he attempting to present McVeigh as a "radical Christian". The point the two individuals were trying to make was that Christians can be just as extreme as Muslims. There was a huge flaw in their logic. Timothy McVeigh wasn't a Christian. Furthermore, Timothy McVeigh bombed the Oklahoma Federal Building in response to the Federal government's raid on the Branch Davidian Compound. McVeigh was a far right anti government kook and not a Christian that went off the deep end. Liberals cling to Timothy McVeigh as a figure to serve in their twisted minds that somehow radical Christians exist in today's society. We all know by now what happened at Fort Hood. Barack Obama called this act a "tragedy". Obama is wrong. The act that was committed against the soldiers and civilians at Fort Hood yesterday was an act of Jihad by a Muslim Extremist. Nidal Malik Hasan killed 17 people and wounded 34 in what is now the worst military base shooting on American soil in history.



I was very busy yesterday, but I was able to catch the story as it first came on Fox News. The first thing that popped into my mind was the the suspect was Muslim before I even heard his name. Of course, the politically correct crowd would immediately have said that I was "profiling". What they call profiling, I call it following a disturbing trend. The left can't dispute the facts. At best they can deflect and try and blur the issue. It isn't Christians, Jews, Hindus or Buddhists going around killing people and blowing buildings up in the name of their gods. Like I've always said, it is what it is. It has been reported that Nidal Hasan was making anti American comments during the days leading up to his attack on his fellow soldiers and civilians. On the day of his attack, he was reported passing out Qurans.



Nidal Hasan isn't dead. He's in a comma. I say yank the plug on him, but death is probably what he wants anyway. It's probably better to deprive him of his 72 virgins anyways. I know there are Muslims who don't validate Nidal Hasan's actions, but Muslims really do need to step up and route out the extremists from within their ranks. It is estimated that the Muslim population on the planet is around one billion. If only one percent is of the "kill the infidel type". That is ten million nutty Muslims in the world that will kill in the name of their god. I said before that liberals can't dispute the violence, murder and destruction Muslim extremists have committed around the world. This is a video of Ann Coulter speaking at John Hopkins University back in 2003. Coulter laid out the case perfectly to how radical Islam can't be ignored. You'll notice that her haters couldn't attack what she said as being false, all they could do is deflect and attack her personally, just like I said liberals do when they can't counter facts.



American Flags are being flown at half mast to show respect to the victims of a deranged Jihadist. I wonder how long will the left continue to apologize for the actions of Muslim extremists. On a side note. The beltway sniper John Allen "Muhammad" will be put the death on November 10th in Virginia. Muhammad killed 10 people in Virginia, Washington DC and Maryland. John Muhammad is a Muslim covert. He was born John Allen Williams. Some to this day don't understand why Lee Boyd Malvo and John Muhammad did what they did. Only the truly naive would dare to even ask such a question.

"Defense attorneys for sniper suspect Lee Boyd Malvo presented a judge yesterday with dozens of sketches that the teen-ager scribbled in his jail cell while awaiting trial for last fall's sniper attacks - crimes that Malvo depicted in his art as "jihad" in America".

"Filled with rambling anti-American messages and hand-drawn images of Osama Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein and a mix of characters from The Matrix movie, the drawings offer an eerie glimpse of Malvo and the possible motivation behind the sniper siege that spread terror around the nation's capital".

Lee Boyd Malvo " I would take you out at your dinner table. ... You will not escape, America. Not now, not ever".

This is a one of the reasons why knowing who's the enemies within this country is way smarter and safer then being a naive pacifist hoping to get along with people who would kill you in a heart beat just because their religious book says to do so.

Liberal logic on display: Case study Nancy Pelosi

Only a true left wing kook believer could be mental enough to somehow believe that the election night wins for the GOP is somehow a win for liberals. They lost to the people of Maine on one of their core ideological beliefs, and they lost two Governorships in two states that the leader of the Democrat Party won by huge margins just one year prior. Leave it to La La Pelosi to try and make lemonade out of spam.



I can't believe this twit was actually born in Baltimore and is the daughter of former mayor Thomas D'Alesandro. Since Nancy resides in San Fransicko, I guess some of her friends may have slipped her some major "stuff" so she could escape the reality of knowing that Democrats got spanked Tuesday night. At least when Baghdad Bob was lying about how Iraqi forces were pushing back American forces, he was entertaining. Nancy isn't entertaining when she lies. She's just annoying. Obama stumped for Corzine 6 times in New Jersey. New Jersey is an ultra liberal state that elected a conservative Republican, yet Nancy Pelosi said that Democrats won? Barack Obama carried New Jersey by 15 points one year prior. Yeah, Democrats won alright. I heard the tinfoilers talking about how they believe "Sarah Palin" got beat, because she endorsed Dough Hoffman in the New York 23rd race. If Sarah Palin was beat by her endorsing Doug Hoffman on her face book page, then Barack Obama got the living snot kicked out of him for actually campaigning 6 times for Corzine in New Jersey and multiple times for Deeds in Virginia. Either Pelosi is just stupid or she's just stupid. Winning New York 23rd isn't a big win as she wants people to think. She lied when she said it was the first time that a Democrat will hold that seat since the civil war. Where is CNN with their fact check when you really need them? Democrat Michael R. McNulty represented NY-23 from 1989-1993. So contrary to Pelosi's delusion or lying, winning NY-23 wasn't historic. It was just a congressional win. Pelosi can now resume her position of nose to glass tray and inhaling.

Special Election recap Part 2: Gay Marriage goes down in flames in liberal Maine.

Maine is apart of the liberal northeast corridor of states. Maine is the home of U.S Senator and liberal Republican Olympia Snows. Something happened in Maine last night that can't be explained away by liberal news commentators or liberals in general. Yesterday in Maine,voters went to the polls to vote on a bill that would repeal a law that would have allowed gays to marry. Maine isn't a southern state. Evangelical Christians aren't a force in the state of Maine. Like I said before, Maine is a very liberal state. Gay Marriage in a liberal state like Maine should have been like the combination of peanut butter and jelly right? Things aren't what they always appear to be. The people of Maine in no uncertain words told their elected officials and the Governor that "Marriage is a union between one man and one woman". 53% of the residents voted in favor of supporting the state law to override the pending gay marriage bill and 47% voted against the bill. That is a 6% margin of victory. I love it how ABC News had to report it as a "narrow win" in their headline. This is a huge win for conservative values. The national polls show that more people identify themselves as conservative by a 2 to 1 margin over those who identify themselves as liberal. This is an interesting fact about liberal states that have laws allowing gay marriage. All of those states that have gay marriage laws were passed through the courts or by the legislators. None of them were passed, because they were on the ballots to allow the people to vote on. In the liberal state of California, Prop 8 was passed by the people which amended their constitution to define a marriage as being between a man and a woman. Liberal pundits are saying that because Chris Christie and Bob McDonnell didn't bring up social issues during their campaigns, it must mean that social conservatism is dead and that the GOP must get away from social issues if they want to win elections. The results from Maine says something completely different. Liberals are such idiots. The reason why Christy and McDonnell didn't make social issues the cornerstones of their campaign is obvious. The number one core issue that is on the minds of most Americans is economy. People have priorities in life, and job creation is their number one concern right now. So once again, liberals who claim to be the smartest people in the room come up looking stupid yet again. With the victory for traditional marriage in Maine, challenges by citizens supporting tradition marriage may not be so far off in other states that have passed laws legalizing it. The winner in Maine goes to Traditional Marriage under the umbrella of Social Conservatism.

Special Election recap Part 1: Hoffman vs Owens

The winners of the special elections last night in New York, New Jersey, Maine an Virginia weren't just the candidates, it was people who either voted for or ran on conservative principals. Some of you might be wondering why did I include New York and Maine, I'll tell you all later in other parts to my recap. Let me start with the New York 23rd congressional race. Doug Hoffman lost to Bill Owens by 4% points, but Hoffman will be remembered for much more in the long run. The pundits all said that Dough didn't have a snowball chance in hell of winning, but he ran anyways. Not only did Hoffman stand up to the powerful Republican establishments on both the local and national level, his candidacy became a symbol that shined a light into exposing the problems within the GOP. It was the act of Hoffman running on conservative principals that has now inspired grass roots conservatives across the country to challenge RINOs in elections next year. Doug Hoffman's campaign was the conservative shot that was heard around the nation. His campaign also helped to expose the truth about those who call themselves conservatives "Newt Gingrich" really aren't what they claim to be. So many teachable moments were learned from an underdog candidate that nobody heard of a month ago but quickly became a household name just by being himself and standing on principal. Dede Scozzafava should also be thanked. It was her "betrayal" that has actually brought to light the lack of party loyalty by liberal and moderate Republicans. The GOP went nuclear last year when Collin Powell endorsed Barack Obama. At one time John Kerry almost convinced John McCain to become a Democrat. Dede is a liberal and Bill Owens is a liberal. So a liberal endorsing a liberal wasn't a big shock to me. To others for some reason it was. Moderate and liberal Republicans like Scozzafava, Specter, Shay, Powell, Graham, Lott, Bloomberg, McCain, Snow, Collins, Hagel and others should serve as a very loud wake up call to the Republican party on both the local, state and national levels. Self serving politicians and politicians who political ideology are actually opposed to what the GOP is suppose to stand for eventually end up betraying the party to one extent or another. It was hypocritical of Collin Powell spewing on about what was wrong with the Republican Party months after he endorsed Barack Obama over his so called friend John McCain. Collin Powell has more in common with Dede Scozzafava then any grass roots conservative Republican. I'm now going to have to take conservatives to task moment. Conservatives were mad at Dede Scozzafava for her endorsing Bill Owens. I'm still confused to why conservatives were angry at Dede. I know Dede is a liberal, and I didn't have a problem with conservatives going after her by them endorsing Hoffman. I still can't figure out why conservatives thought she was going to be a "good party soldier" and endorse Hoffman after what happened to her in the first place. When Hillary Clinton was basically forced out by Obama supporters near the end of the primaries, conservatives said Hillary was stupid for endorsing Obama after how the media and Obama supporters treated her. So what made this situation with Dede any different? She had a right to be angry. I guess conservatives wanted Dede to be chump and go along with the people who screwed her just like Hillary did for Obama. I don't want people to misunderstand what I'm saying. I'm not coming down on conservatives for backing Hoffman. I liked Hoffman as wel. I'm saying that conservatives shouldn't be angry at Dede for what she did. If anyone who had a legitimate right to be extremely angry at Dede is the New York Republican Party and the Republican National Committee. These are the people who backed her from day one and spent over $900,000 on her behalf. That was an embarrassing and expensive teachable moment for the GOP. The winners in the 23rd race are conservatives. The overrall objective was the send a message to the Republican establishment over their selection of Dede in the first place, and that mission was accomplished.

"Say it isn't so Joe" Biden tried to mock Sarah Palin over a remark that didn't orginate with her.

Joe Biden reminds me of an odd family member that other family members try to avoid contact with. The guy is a walking embarrassment every time he opens his mouth. I'm still complexed on how liberals actually thought Joe Biden was smarter and more intuit then Sarah Palin. Biden is known as the "human gaffe" machine for a reason. Every time he opens his mouth, something stupid always seems to find a way out of it. Here is the latest illustration to back up my words. Joe Biden was campaigning in upstate New York today trying to help Bill Owen in the 23rd district election scheduled for tomorrow. Doug Hoffman is Bill Owen's opponent, but good ol crazy joe decided to use part of his speech to attack Sarah Palin. I didn't know that Sarah was running for the 23rd district race. Maybe Obama doesn't let Joe out of the White House tunnels as much these days in order to keep him out of the loop. Well Joe mocked Palin apparently for a statement in which Palin made about energy independence. I still haven't found the quote of her saying it, but apparently Biden and the Obama tin foil hat brigade are attacking her for her saying "drill baby drill".



I like to think that my memory is pretty good. Let's say for the sake of argument that Sarah Palin did say "drill baby drill". Did that statement originate with Sarah? It's odd that Biden and the tinfoilers would attack Sarah Palin for supposedly uttering those three words, but they didn't have a problem with the originator of those words who happened not to have been Sarah Palin.



Unless Sarah Palin had a sex change operation last year and also had a very bad sun burn, I would swear that the person who created the term "drill baby drill" was the Republican National Chairman Michael Steele. So why didn't Biden aim his remarks at the Republican National Chairman who coined the phrase in the first place? I've said from the beginning that Sarah Palin is severe threat to Barack Obama. His loyal kooks try to deny it with every breath, but the old saying goes that "actions speak louder then words". There has been no rational explanation for the extraordinary tactics they've used in trying to destroy one woman. This brings me back to my original question. Why did the Vice President of the United States who was campaigning for a congressional candidate use part of his speech to attack a person who isn't in public office? The answer is obvious. She has gotten under Obama and the Democrat establishment's skin. Sarah Palin's death panel comment is still a painful thorn that Obama and liberals have yet been able to remove from the Health Care debate. Little do Biden, Obama and Axelrod realize, their actions are actual helping elevate Palin as the anti Obama torch bearer. If Hoffman wins tomorrow, drill baby drill will be the least of their problems. Run Sarah Run might start to get echoed instead. Say it isn't so Joe.