Friday, December 25, 2009

Merry Christmas one and all!



As you all know, I've never been a person to champion the stupidity and mind numbing ignorance known as political correctness. Everywhere I've gone over the last couple of days, I've said Merry Christmas to those who uttered "Happy Holidays" to me first. Jesus Christ is the true meaning behind Christmas.  It's pretty pathetic how liberals have such an inferiority complex when it comes to the words "Jesus", "Christ" and "Christmas". A few week ago, a young boy was suspended from school for merely drawing a cross. I'm sure if that kid would have drawn the Obama symbol, his teacher would have given him an "A" grade for being "creative".

It never ceases to amaze me how cowardly many retailers are. They know that the Christmas shopping season accounts for most of their profits during the year, yet they are too gutless to even mention the holiday in which they are advertising to customers to shop in their establishments. The whole premise of using "Happy Holiday" as some sort of comprise so in not to "offend" others who don't celebrate Christmas is an obnoxious insult to people like me who do celebrate Christmas. It's not my problem that others who are uncomfortable at the mention of the word Christmas suffer from an inferiority complex. I've heard this Christmas season that some malls have banned the playing of religious Christmas songs. Funny how that doesn't surprise me. Maybe the malls and the schools should just play the different variations of the many Obama songs instead. I wanted to say this a few days ago, and finally I have a chance in which to do so. Anyways, Merry CHRISTmas to all. Oh, to those who are offended by the picture of the manger scene, "oh well tis the season deal with it".

Monday, December 21, 2009

So liberals don't use the race card against people who dare oppose Barack Obama right?

One again the self professed smartest people in the room are coming out looking like a bunch of idiots. So liberals are saying that it is the "conservatives" who are obsessing over Obama's race and not them? I quote one of Jim Curry's famous lines when he use to star on the television show In Living Color, "al righty then". Democrat U.S Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island invoked the race card from the bottom of the deck Sunday in describing people who are against any type of a socialized medical bill as being "right wing Aryans". The Senator was either lying to or was in a case of denial when Washington Times report Kerry Picket shortly confronted Senator Whitehouse to ask him abut his comments. This is how pathetically desperate the left is. They can't even fess up to their own comments, When I comment on Obama and race, it is most of the time in response to how liberals worship Obama based on his political ideology in combination with his race and also how liberals use Obama's skin color as a weapon against anyone who doesn't support his policies like how Senator Whitehouse demonstrated. Let the words of people like Jimmy Carter, David Epstein, Nancy Pelosi and now Senator Sheldon Whitehouse further provide proof of what I've been saying along.



It's hysterical how the left wants to attack me, yet they can't attack the evidence that I so easily am able to present time and time and time again. Once again, attacking the messenger doesn't discredit the message guys.

Saturday, December 19, 2009

Why do blacks continue to make excuses for Barack Obama at every turn?

Most blacks still show unshakable support for Barack Obama while non whites who voted for Obama have reevaluated their support for him. I got criticized by the left both black and white for my comments on why the main reason blacks voted for Obama in the first place. The one question to this day that they still have a hard time answering is "how is Barack Hussein Obama any different from any other liberal politician to run for president? The answer is he isn't. Race was promoted heavily among Obama's supporters during the campaign. The word "historic" was used constantly. It's comical listening to black Obama supporters who call into radio talk shows in what seems to be desperate attempts to defend Obama and change public opinion of him. The most used talking point among black Obama supporters is that "he needs time to fix the problems" or that the people who don't like him are "racists". Of course it will never dawn on them that it is Obama's own policies that are extending the economic problems and in many cases making them worse. In a Gallup poll conducted last month it showed that Obama's support among white voters is down to just 39%. The same poll showed that black support for Obama has averaged 93% during his time in office, and has been at or above 90% nearly every week during his presidency.I commented last month for the reason for the steep decline among whites. Independents are mostly made up of white voters, and those voters are fleeing from Obama in record numbers. Blacks on the other hand are overwhelmingly registered Democrat. I believe blacks who defend Obama at every turn lack any credibility. The same black Obama supporters who loyally defend Obama were the same ones who blamed George Bush for the 911 attacks or claimed he orchestrated the 911 attacks seven months into his first term. Most blacks blamed the 2000 recession on George Bush even though the dot-com bubble started under Clinton and burst three months after George Bush was sworn into office. I find it extremely two faced that black Obama supporters want everybody else to now give Obama "a chance and more time", yet they didn't "practice what they are now preaching" when Bush was in office for eight years. I came across an interesting video interview segment conducted by a black news and opinion site called "The Grio". 

Harlem isn't exactly known for producing politically savvy and knowledgeable voters. I've said many times before that those who think along lines of race tend to not think at all. Here's a classic video from last year in which a person from the Howard Stern show interviewed people in Harlem. The person presented the positions that John McCain supported and made them appear as if Barack Obama supported them instead. Hopefully race and ignorance won't factor in the 2012 outcome.


Obama leaves early from the global warming summit in Copenhagen so he wouldn't get caught in a record snow storm coming home.



A major snow storm is heading up the East Coast. Baltimore is scheduled to receive almost two feet of snow. With a week before Christmas, who would have ever thought that snow still exist? Didn't Al Gore say that "the earth has a fever" or something alone those lines? If the earth is heating up, how come the Mid Atlantic and East Coast are scheduled to receive record snowfalls? It's not that I'm calling Al Gore a liar. I'm merely calling him an opportunist who stands to financially benefit from his huge lie about man being able to impact the weather. I guess I am calling him a liar after all. I found it ironic almost hilarious that while the global fooling crowd is gathered in Copenhagen, a man made global warming blizzard dumped snow on the city. Copenhagen rarely ever gets sow. For the snow fall to happen during the global fooling summit is almost like God deciding to have poke fun at them. Well Barry had to rush home early before the final vote in Copenhagen on a global fooling slush fund pack could be reached. It was all due to the "weather back home". Here's an interesting side note. Many socialists and communists gathered in Copenhagen for the global fooling farce. The biggest applause came at the event when anti American dictator Hugo Chavez gave an anti capitalist speech. As the two faced, hypocritical frauds cheered on Hugo Chavez, I wonder what was miles per gallon of those stretch limousines and the carbon footprint of those leer private jets that brought them to Copenhagen in the first place? As for Hugo Chavez, if he truly hates capitalism as much as he claims, why don't he just give away his worldly goods? One would think that he would just give away the state owned Venezuelan oil to the world's needy right? Oh wait, he charges for that oil. Citgo is owned by the country of Venezuela. I don't remember Citgo gasoline ever being given away for free. By Citgo making a profit for selling it's gasoline, Venezuela is also making a profit, but Hugo doesn't seem to mind that though. I thought making profits is suppose to be icky? The gathering at Copenhagen in many ways is the far left's version of Woodstock just without the mud and drugs. I believe the gathering of the kooks there was more about being seen then actually doing anything about their "championed cause". Any agreement that comes out of Copenhagen isn't binding on the United States anyways. Let it snow, let it snow, let it snow. Maybe the snow will keep Obama out of the country for a few more days.

The liberal civil war at MSNBC may be starting.

Welcome to the Twilight Zone. A civil war among the left may be starting to break out on of all places MSNBC. Chris Matthew's man crush on Obama is worse then I thought. Matthews is so goo goo eyed over Obama that now he is attacking his own fellow liberals who criticize him. This was Chris Matthews on Thursday interviewing John Heilemann from the New Yorker. Chris wasn't amused by the far left fringe of the Democrat Party attacking his beloved Barack Obama. I wish I could play the Tammy Wynette song "Stand by your man". That's what Matthew's defense of Obama reminded me of.



Chris Mathews is an old school Democrat partisan political hack dating back to the Carter administration. Chris needs to be brought up to speed on the news that the Democrat Party was purchased in 2006 by the far left loon bat group Moveon.org. They've even said "we own it". So in reality those "nut roots" as Chris called them do own the party. Chris Matthews attacking the far left is part of the story here, but there is another element. Today on the Ed Schultz show, Ed had on his show the founder of the Daily Kos Markos Moulitsas to give him a chance to respond to what Chris said about the liberal bloggers and leftist fringe groups within the Democrat Party. If I didn't know better after watching the interview, I would have sworn that Ed invited Markos on his show so that the two of them could gang up on and tear down Chris Matthews for what he said the day before.



Ed Schultz is the real deal fringe left wing loon bat. I've never known for the host of one political commentary show to have a guest on his show for the sole purpose of attacking the host of another political commentary show who shares the same ideology and "on the same network"! Both Ed & Chris work for MSNBC. Chris may want to try and tone down his affection for Obama in the near future. Barack Obama may be the leader of the Democrat Party due to him being the president, but it's those kooky nut rooters that ultimately control Obama and the Democrat Party. If Matthews watched the interview between Ed & Moulitsas, I doubt very much he had a tingle up his leg.

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

The Washington DC City Council voted to approval the legalization of "Gay Marriage".




Today, it can be said that the District of Columbia's City Council went rogue and voted against the will of their voters. What the hell right? Congress is doing the same thing right now on a national level. I have a very strong feeling that today's votes by the DC City Council wasn't with the blessing of the majority of the residents of the city. Blacks whether they want to admit it or not are conservative on several important issues. Once of those issues is that they believe that marriage is defined as being between one man and one woman. The black churches in Washington DC may parade the Democrat politician around every election cycle, but the black pastors don't promote homosexuality or the alteration of marriage from the their pews. Today by an 11-2 vote, the City Council of Washington DC approved to legalization of Gay Marriage. In all of the news stories I've read today about the City Council vote and the bill's passing. I haven't read one story yet from black citizens who make up the majority of the population of Washington D.C. Of course the media will stick their microphones and cameras into the faces of the people who support gay marriage in DC "mainly white liberals", but they won't stick those same microphones and cameras into the faces of the black residents of DC. Here's the reason why that is. The media has presented the face of what they deem "homophobes" as being that is "conservative white males". If the media was to film blacks showing opposition to the passing of a gay marriage bill in DC, it would destroy the media's presentation on what typical "homophobes" looks like and are. Some of the black clergy are already speaking out and are vowing to fight the City Council's vote as far as they can and for as long as it takes. Rev. Harry Jackson is the pastor of a huge mega church on the outskirts of D.C who lead the fight to stop the passing of the gay marriage bill. Reverend Harry Jackson said something that re enforced what I've known all along.

"In D.C., some very vulnerable black councilmen went along with the city council, and some of these guys will not be sitting in those chairs in 2010 elections".

I would love to see polls conducted by Gallup, Rasmussen, Zogby and other pollsters to show how the residents of D.C truly feel about the actions taken by the City Council. Some members in congress have already vowed to try and stop the City Council bill from becoming law. I see a potential unification among black and white religious conservatives in trying to stop this bill from becoming law. The passing of this bill should serve as a wake up call to blacks who unknowingly support Democrat liberal politicians and don't know where they stand on the issues. Things like this happen, and the voters are left asking themselves what in the hell just happened?

The Governator attacks Sarahcuda over global fooling aka "Climate Change".














In 2010, the long painful experiment in California will finally be over. The results from the eight year experiment will show that liberal actors should never be governors. I like the movies Arnold Schwarnegger stars in. My favorite movie to this day is the Running Man. Outside of Hollyweird however, Arnold Schwarzenegger is a flat out embarrassing Republican joke. In two terms, he managed to drive the one prosperous state of California to the brink of bankruptcy. The Republican party has it's share of clueless,air headed liberals just like the Democrats. Arnold is a huge hollyweird liberal. He's bought into the "global fooling" hoax hook, line, sinker and script. While in Copenhagen, the human dumbbell attacked Sarah Palin for her comments about the hoax of global warming. Arnold told the Financial Times

You have to ask: what was she trying to accomplish?” “Is she really interested in this subject or is she interested in her career and in winning the Republican nomination for president? You have to take all these things with a grain of salt.

Arnold is an idiot, and I can't wait to see his "End of Days" as the governor of California next year. I'm not just insulting Arnold just for the fun of it. The guy really is seriously stupid. If Arnold would have done his research, he would have known that John McCain believed in man made global warning too and he won the Republican Nomination. So Arnold's "theory" has been officially and factually may I add "terminated". So he wants to know what is Sarah Palin trying to accomplish? I'm going to go off on a climb in saying this, but I think Sarah Palin is trying to accomplish educating fools like Arnold. With out a script memorized, Arnold is pretty useless. Just last year, Arnold spouted nonsense about "the fix is in" about global warming. Arnold Schwarzenegger like most liberals is a huge two faced hypocrite. Not only does this global alarmist drives one of the most gas inefficient and emission spewing vehicles ever made, that being a Hummer H1, he also commutes by plane twice a week from his mansion in Brentwood to the state capital in Sacramento. I doubt Arnold ever calculated his "carbon footprint" even once. I also doubt Arnold's mansion is "environmental friendly". The people who buy into the hoax of global warming aka global cooling aka climate change claim to be so smart about the subject. Funny how the ruling class of smarts can't explain how their pope "Al Gore" doesn't have any credentials to make him an expert on the subject of climatology. The only means the global alarmist folks have to prop up Al Gore is his joke of a movie "An Inconvenient Truth". Sarah Palin knows the truth. People like Arnold can't handle the truth. I would bet money on Sarah Palin any day that she could destroy Arnold or Gore himself in a debate on whether man made global warming is real or not. Also, it's ok for Arnold to question the motives of Sarah Palin in 2012. Unlike him, she can plan for 2012. He can call it wraps next year.

Monday, December 14, 2009

How low can the approval numbers of a B- rated president go?





With 11 days before Christmas, I've received one of the best gifts this year. The gift of people finally snapping out of the "yes we can" daze that they were in since early last year. The latest Rasmussen daily Presidential Tracking Poll on Monday shows that only "24% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty-two percent (42%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -18". Obama's approval numbers are fast approaching that of George W Bush's during the last two years of his second term. Of course the community organizer turned president is still clueless to what is going on around him. Obama thought that he could push forth his socialist agenda, and he thought that people wouldn't say anything in opposition. Almost a year later, I still can't recall any legislation in which Obama supports that is popular with Americans. Coming up on the one year anniversary of the Obama "error", Obama gave himself a "solid B+" grade for his performance.



I think Obama must have gone back to smoking stuff other then cigarettes if he truly believes he deserves a B+ grade.The economy isn't growing, foreclosures ,personal and business bankruptcies are at an all time high, banks aren't lending money, states are racking up record debt due to lack of sales tax revenue. Every time when the economy is an issue, Obama goes back to his good old reliable bogeyman of George W Bush. What Barry doesn't understand is that "the blame bush cow has run out of milk". People might not have been major fans of Bush, but at least they knew that under the eight years of the Bush presidency, the unemployment rate was never as high as it is now. I've said this many times before. If Obama was truly a moderate, his platform wouldn't be rubbing the majority of Americans the wrong way. It's really that simple. To the left it isn't that simple however.

Thursday, December 10, 2009

Will Smith thinks that Barack Obama represents a "flash point in the evolution of humanity"?

How in the hell can so many people on the left be so freaking mentally screwed up?! I haven't been to the movies in years and for good reason. I will not contribute my hard earned money to a community of hypocritical, communist loving, dim witted Hollyweird drones. Hollweird is a place where when people age it doesn't bring maturity. Actor Will Smith said in an interview with CNN that Barack Obama marks a "flash point in evolution" for humanity.



Liberals believe that Barack Obama is the smartest person to ever hold the position of President. They worship him as some sort of god like person. They become very insulted when people challenge them on their claim of his intelligence. They still can't answer to this day why their beloved messisiah refuses to release his grades from when he attended Occidental College, Princeton and Harvard. This is what happens when a typical Hollyweird liberal like Will Smith speaks without having a script prepared for him to memorize, he sounds foolish. Contrary to what Will Smith said, there is nothing evolutionary about Barack Obama, and he hasn't played a historic role on the world's stage in regards to being a great humanitarian figure. What I'm saying may sound harsh to does who are Obama supporters, but the facts are the facts. Great humanitarian figures that come to mind are Mahatma Ghandi, Mother Theressa, Billy Graham, Dr. Martin Luther King, President Ronald Reagan, These people are etched into the timeline of humanity, because they have actually contributed to the changing of humanity with their deeds. Obama was merely elected to a political office. Barack Obama today while accepting his honary Noble Peace Prize admitted that he did nothing to deserve it. I have to give him credit for him admitting the obvious. Praise and accolades come when people actual do things to earn them not just for merely being born a certain skin color and elected because of it. That's something Will Smith and his fellow celebratards will never comprehend. It's just not in their script.

The idol worship of Barack Obama has gone global.



The worship of the man who dances with teleprompters has now gone global. This statue of Barack Obama was created in Indonesia and was placed in the Indonesian capital today to coincide with Obama receiving his Nobel Peace prize "for what we still don't know" even though he just ordered 30,000 more soldiers to Afghanistan. This man has had songs named after him, schools renamed after him, and now he has a statue made in his image. Not bad for a who hasn't done anything to warrant any of it. I'm not sure I see the point of this statue though. Obama did attend school for a short period of time there when he was a child, but he isn't a citizen of Indonesia nor a political figure in Indonesia. I wonder what's the story behind the "Friends of Obama Foundation"? Are they like the new age version of the Jim Jones grape koolaid sippers or something?



People on the left attacked those on the right for bringing up the issue about the time Obama spent in Indonesia as a child. The left said it was "irrelevant". It looks like the people in Indonesia don't think that.

Tuesday, December 08, 2009

Jon Stewart may have found his George W Bush replacement.

Looks as if the liberal natives in Hollyweird are getting restless with Obama. Now the latest liberal entertainer to join the line of disillusioned supporters of Obama is comedian Jon Stewart of Comedy Central's The Daily Show. When a liberal starts to use common sense, that is a sign that his or her liberal core is starting to show some signs of cracks. I could be wrong though. Jon could be just going after Obama, because it is merely funny for him to do so. Then again, David Letterman calls himself a comedian, yet all he does is lick the knee caps of Barack Obama at any given moment. Jon use to attack Bush more then any other comedian I know. Maybe Jon realizes that him being a pom-pom waving cheerleader for Obama won't do wonders for his comedy show or career. Jon's segment on Obama was not only funny, but it was 100% accurate. The mocking of Obama by Stewart is something I would expect Stewart to do against Bush not against Obama. The knives are truly starting to turn inwards among Obama's "loyal" hollyweird supporters. It's such a "funny" thing to watch.

table style='font:11px arial; color:#333; background-color:#f5f5f5' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='360' height='353'>The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10cAmerican Idlewww.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political HumorHealth Care Crisis
Support Sarah Palin
Palin Pride (libertarians for Palin)