Saturday, May 30, 2009

Sonia Sotomayor, Miguel Estrada and the left's hypocrisy on race.

The title says it all. The left had no problems worrying about the "feelings" of the Hispanic community, when they went after Maguel Estrada and Alberto Gonzales with a passion. Senate Republicans should throw the left's hypocrisy right back in their face. I forgot that the GOP currently doesn't have a backbone.

Friday, May 29, 2009

The Court of Appeals make policy?

So the Court of Appeals is where "policy is made"? Silly me, this woman is brighter then I thought she was. Who needs congress to make laws, when we have the Court of Appeals, right? I can't believe I aced civics in high school believing that congress makes the laws. Congress is known as the "legislative branch" of the federal government. This is why the bills they work on are known as "legislation". So it would seem that Sonia Sotomayor believes the courts are suppose to overshadow the role of congress. Why should liberals be appointed to the courts in the first place? Its like hiring a person to fill a job position, but that person refuses to do their job or want to do it differently once they are hired. In the real world that person would be fired.

Thursday, May 28, 2009

The left is still living in fear of Sarah Palin

Sarah Palin has always been a threat to the left since McCain announced her last year. She is the only other national political figure that rivals Obama on the "rock star" status stage. If the left truly believed that Palin didn't have any other political plans after 2010, they would have forgotten about her back on November 5th. That hasn't been the case. Since Palin returned to Alaska to resume her job as Governor, liberals activists have filed lawsuits left and right against her. Their agenda is to try and financially bankrupt her. So much for the liberal compassion claim, This is what I'm thinking. If they truly thought she wasn't going to run in 2012, why would they waste so much effort and money into trying to bring her down? This story is from United Press International. I want you to read this paragraph.

The governor's office said it was the 13th ethics complaint against Palin or her staff that was resolved without finding an executive ethics act violation. Palin has agreed to reimburse the state for 10 state-paid trips taken by her children

This paragraph is all anyone needs to know about what is happening. Liberals are throwing everything at Palin in an attempt to desperately make something stick. Out of 13 complaints, all of them came up empty. Liberals criticize conservatives for them wanting to see Obama's birth certificate. Even though it is a legitimate claim, liberals just say that "right wingers" are being "petty" and are "sore losers". What do they call what they are doing against Sarah Palin now? Nobody has forgotten the stink liberals and the media made over Sarah's "clothing gate". I knew the claims made by the anonymous figure heads were bogus from the start for one reason. The Republican National Committee didn't say one word on the issue. It's great to be right. Last Tuesday, the FEC dismissed a complaint by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) against Palin and the RNC, ruling that the approximately $150,000 spent on clothing for the governor and her family was permitted as coordinated party expenditures. CREW is an ultra liberal kook organization funded by George Sorros. This is what liberals and CREW didn't realize.

"National political parties are allowed to spend a limited amount of general election funds on behalf of and in coordination with presidential candidates".

As long as the RNC didn't go over the federal limit, no crime was committed. Unless liberals were contributors to the RNC, the amount of money spent during the McCain/Palin campaign was their business and their business alone. It will be telling to see the next bag of kooky tricks the left will try to sling at Palin. Desperation isn't a pretty sight.

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Sonia Sotomayor's Ricci v. DeStefano ruling

Judge Sonia Sotomayor basically upheld the decision by the City of New Haven Connecticut to discriminate against firemen based on race. Here it is again

Judge Sotomayor was a member of a three judge panel that decided in favor of the city's decision to throw out the results of a promotion exam because not enough minority candidates scored well.

So I guess the left is going to try and paint conservatives as “racists” for bringing up the decision of Sotomayor. This is why I’ve never been a fan of Affirmative Action. In this situation, a racial group was discriminated against merely for doing well on an exam. Where is the rationality in this? A little interesting tidbit was left out of the story and not reported by the media. A certain percentage of “minorities” did score in the upper percentage range on the New Haven Firefighter’s promotional exam. The minorities that scored well and ultimately had their tests thrown out were”HISPANICS”. This is the dirty little secret that the media and the left doesn’t want people to know. It would seem that Sonia Sotomayor decision actually discriminated against fellow Hispanics. I wonder how other Hispanics would feel about Sotomayor knowing that she in essence screwed over other Hispanics, because blacks didn’t score well enough on the exam? Getting back to the exam, I don’t appreciate nor accept the racism inflicted among the firefighters merely for doing the right thing by studying hard for the exam. The actions of the City of New Haven demonstrated what I've known all along about liberals. It reflects a pattern often used by the left in similar situations in regards to academic tests and promotions. Liberals believe in “equal outcomes”, but life isn’t about equal results. They believe that “minorities” aren’t capable of passing the same tests as their whites counterparts. These are the same people that believe blacks can’t learn the same way whites can. Its liberals that support black kids learning “Ebonics”. Liberals claim that the S.A.T exam is “racist” against blacks. I’m surprised that Sonia Sotomayor didn’t rule that the New Haven Firemen promotional exam was “racist” based on the grounds that more minorities didn’t score in the upper percentage range then whites counterparts. I have a question though that nobody on the left can answer. They keep saying that she will bring "real life experience" to the bench as a Supreme Court Justice. What does that mean exactly and how does it apply to the job?

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Meet Obama's "token racist" nominee to the Supreme Court?

That is what the left said about Justice Clarence Thomas, when he was picked by Herbert Walker Bush to become his nominee for the Supreme Court. That was then, and this is now. The media has transformed back into its "historic" reporting mode. The news that Obama has picked a liberal Hispanic female has the media giddy with delight and joy. I have no doubt Chris Mathews received another thrill up his leg today. Her background however is pretty radical in regards to the issue of race. Nobody on the right ever expected Obama to pick a constructionist judge for his nominee, and Obama didn't disappoint. When will liberals give up the con game of trying to pass Obama off as a "centrist"? This is a statement Miss. Sotomayor made that should become a huge negative mark on her qualifications to sit on the bench.

Sonia Sotomayor "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life",

What exactly does race have to do with the interruption of the constitution or law in general? Race would only play a factor in a judge’s decision if the judge was indeed an "activist judge" and not a constructionist judge to begin with. Her statement was not only racist, but it exposes her hand on what type of judge she would be in the Supreme Court. Can you all imagine the response if Chief Justice John Roberts would have said the following

Justice Roberts "
“I would hope that a wise white man with the richness of his experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion [as a judge] than a Latina female who hasn’t lived that life"

Judge Roberts would have been crucified if he made the exact same statement Sonia Sotomayor made. That's why I call these people moral frauds and two faces, double talking snakes. I believe that label is appropriate.
The media of course is not reporting the two main reasons why Obama picked Sonia Sotomayor. Most on the right haven't figured it out themselves. The nomination of Miss. Sotomayor is political payback for the majority of Hispanic voters that voted for Obama last year. Some political pundits say the Hispanic turnout was key to Obama's victory. The second reason is that Obama doesn't want to alienate women that voted for him. Not having a female liberal on the bench will not sit well with liberal female voters. If Governor Sarah Palin does run in 2012, the female liberal vote might have betrayed Obama and supported Palin in protest for being taken advantage of and overlooked. Obama is a putz, but he is a calculating putz. I even have to give him that much credit. Everything with Obama is about calculation.

Rush Limbaugh nailed it right on the head today in his segment on Sonia Sotomayor. I'm sure he’ll be called a racist just for stating the obvious about Miss Sotomayor. The whole thing about non-whites being incapable of being racists is so retarded in nature by the left. Power has nothing to do with it, and Sotomayor's racist leanings are no better then the racist Hispanic group "La Raza". For those that don't know what La Raza stands for, it translates into "the race" in Spanish. I have more to come on Miss. Sotomayor.

Monday, May 25, 2009

Thank You

Sunday, May 24, 2009

Nancy Pelosi stars in "A lie for another day".

Can someone explain to me why Nancy Pelosi is in China. She isn't the Secretary of State. Is she using this trip as a way to escape the fire she finds herself in over calling the CIA a bunch of "liars"? The "story" is that she is in China to discuss "climate change". I wonder what was the size of the carbon footprint her huge private jet created on the trip from Washington DC to China?

Obama admits that our country "IS BROKE".

So with Obama admitting the obvious, will that stop him from spending money we don't have? We all should know the answer to that stupid question. Our country is on the verge of losing its AAA credit rating, I doubt the Obama fanatics even really care. The blame Bush cow can only be milked but so many times before it comes up dry.

Saturday, May 23, 2009

An Obama Memorial Day classic moment

The classics just get funnier as time goes on. Since this is Memorial Day weekend, I thought it would be appropriate to display a Barack Obama flash back moment. This is Barack Obama one year ago speaking at a Memorial Day ceremony in New Mexico. Obama's comments about seeing fallen heros in the audience was the first known example that Obama's teleprompter was really the one calling the shots.

Liz Cheney shows how to destroy liberals in an ambush interview.

This is Dick Cheney's daughter Liz Cheney showing how to shut down a liberal ambush interview in its tracks. This video should be required watching for any conservative that goes on a liberal news show to be interviewed. I loved how Liz would not respond to Norah O'Donell's absurd statements and actually called her out on them. Liz then went on to set the record straight.

Micheal Steele could have saved himself a world of hurt during his "interview" by D.L Hughley if he would have just challenged the questions for how stupid they were.

Friday, May 22, 2009

Lets see Obama blame this on Bush

Dollar hits new multimonth low vs euro, pound, yen

I said repeatedly this was going to happen. So many people still haven't figured out why gas prices have shot up so high so quickly. The news media is trying to spin the real reason for the sharp increase in oil and gas prices. They're blaming the increase merely on the start of the summer driving season. If it could only be explained away as easy as that. Here's the problem with their explanation. The demand for oil has remained extremely soft, and oil and gas stock inventories are still high. In other words, speculation on the increase of the use of oil and gas couldn't make the prices of both energy commodities shoot up as fast as they have within the
last three months. I posted the real reason for the increase as the headline. The dollar has hit a multi month low against all of the major currencies. Commodities prices tend to follow in the opposite direction to the increase and decrease of the dollar.

As the dollar has been been sinking in value, oil prices have been rapidly increasing. Gasoline is of course made from oil, so the price of gasoline has increased right along with the price of a barrel of oil. Some refineries are operating at eighty five percent capacity, because the demand isn't there to warrant them running at a full one hundred percent. People also forgot or didn't even know that OPEC cut production of oil output by several million barrels late last year. That decreased the supply of oil on the world market. This combination spells a wicked hurting on our economy in the very near future.
The first bomb that dropped was when the dollar started to fall. The second bomb that dropped was with the cutting of oil production from OPEC. The most destructive bomb has yet to be dropped. That bomb will be when demand truly does pick up for gasoline. Gas prices truly could reach five dollars a gallon. That would be like a nuclear bomb exploding on the U.S economy. Growth is the only way any country can emerge from a recession, but it looks like ours have been placed on quick sand. The more we try to move in regards to economic recovery, the more we are going to sink because of it. We have Mr. Hope&Change to thank for that. You all might want to whip out those government subsidized tire gauges and imagine they will ease the pain to come.

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

The debut of the Right Bite.

Here is the first edition of my weekly commentary that will be known as the "Right Bite".

This is going to be a work in progress, but I think it wasn't bad for my first go at it.

Sunday, May 17, 2009

Today is the day for Notre Dame to dance with the devil.

I wonder why the news outlet had to mention that Alan Keyes is a Republican? Did they believe by them mentioning it, it would help to discredit what he is doing? I notice they didn't say Democrat President Barack Obama will be appearing at Notre Dame today. Most news outlets will go out of their way to not report a story that will make liberals look bad. If the story is too big to be ignored, they will only report it in an effort to discredit the non liberals in the story. I guess Keyes and the pro lifers are being portrayed as nothing more then a bunch of "right wing extremists" for standing up for their principals. The repercussions of Obama's visit will be felt at Notre Dame long after this day. The Vatican has remained silent on the issue. Since Pope Benedict is the leader of the Catholic Church, he should weigh in on this issue.

David Axelrod compared Carrie Prejean to a "dog".

What is it with the hatred by liberals toward conservative women? I could only imagine the uproar if a prominent conservative would have dare referred to Michelle Obama as a "mutt". For Obama's top advisor and former campaign manager, he gets cheer for calling a woman that. I won't be waiting for the feminist groups to weigh in on this of course. This should serve as another example in the book of where the "hate speech" is truly originating from. The word "dog" is unfairly used to describe a perceived unattractive female. David may want to look into getting eye laser surgery or contacts. Carrie Prejean is very attractive woman. I don't expect liberals to exercise common sense, but I do at least expect them to see the obvious when it comes to appearances.

Saturday, May 16, 2009

Only a rebounding private sector can prolong the insolvency of Medicare and Social Security.

When George Bush talked about Social Security going broke five years ago, liberal democrats accused Bush of "fear mongering". Well it looks like democrats can no longer deny nor shield the ugly truth under this recession. Two of their grand social programs are going broke faster then the experts expected them too. This year's Social Security report projects that the trust fund will be exhausted in 2037 and Medicare could go broke as soon as 2017. The insolvency dates have been pushed up a year for both programs due to the recession. The government is collecting less and less tax revenues to pay into the system. This presents an interesting problem for the magic teleprompter. The amount of older people that will start drawing Social Security is going to continue to rise as the baby boomers continue to reach retirement age. Since the contributors are paying in less due to the amount of people out of work, how is little Barry going to work out aka fudge the numbers? Even when the economy was firing on all cylinders, Social Security and Medicare was still going broke. The programs just weren't going broke at the rate they are now. If the economy continues to get worse, the two programs insolvency date will continue to be pushed up that much sooner. Since Obama really doesn't care about reviving the private sector, it looks like the unthinkable to some my just happen after all.

Introducing the Obama Card

Imagine being able to charge whatever you want and never personally having to pay for it. Ask Mr. Obama that question. When the bill comes due, who's going to pay for it exactly?

The latest attempts by the "intolerant" left to destroy Carrie Prejean has backfired yet again.

Some "controversial" pictures surfaced a few weeks ago of Carrie Prejean posing "semi topless". I guess this was suppose to have been an attempt at a "October surprise" but in May against Prejean. I know for certain that if Carrie would have been the good little politically correct puppet and won the Miss America pageant, those pictures wouldn't have seen the light of day. I know how the game is played with the left. When they can't control or defeat the message of the opposition, they then try to the discredit the messenger of the opposition instead. Joseph Wurzelbacher aka Joe the Plumber knows all about how liberals use character assassination, when they can't defend or attack an idea in the arena of ideas. The photos in question are so tame in nature; Hugh Hefner of Playboy would probably yawn in boredom just looking at them. The releasing of the these pictures were suppose to have served a two front attack strategy against Miss California. The first strategy was to have her dethroned as Miss California. Donald Trump is the owner of the Miss America pagent, and he said that the pictures were "beautiful". He also said he saw nothing distasteful about the photos, so Carrie Prejean can keep her title as Miss California. At the news conference held by Donald Trump, Trump and Prejean made reference to Hillary and Baracks holding the same shared views on the what defines marriage. Carrie gave an impassioned and articulate speech about how she was trashed simply for exercising her first amendment right.

So the first plan backfired for the left. The latest tactic that is circulating around is to try and destroy Carrie's reputation as a Christian, because she took the photos in the first place. When liberals try to use god in order to make a point, its better then watching Comedy Central. Their "argument" is that Prejean is a "hypocrite", because she claims to be a Christian yet took the semi topless pictures. Actually magazines like GQ, Rolling Stones and Esquire and Vanity Fair show more skin on their front covers then Prejean showed in the "controversial" pictures, and these are nationally circulated non adult themed magazines. If liberals actually took the time to read the bible, they would quit their latest smear attack.

Friday, May 15, 2009

What do Carrie Prejean, Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin and Barack Obama have in common?

If the left knew that their beloved leader Barack Obama was actually against one of their main activist causes, I wonder how would they feel towards him knowing that? Would they call Obama the same vicious and vile names that they call conservatives? Miss California Carrie Prejean’s name has been dragged through the mud and back ever since the Miss America pageant. She has been called everything from a bigot to a bitch and even worse just, because she has a “diverse” viewpoint on marriage other then what liberals like Perez Hilton don't find “acceptable”.
Many people have come out in support of Carrie Prejean since the pageant. One of the nation’s most famous pageant contestants has recently spoke out in support of Prejean’s position on the defense of traditional marriage. There are two other well-known people that support the defense of traditional marriage, and I have a feeling that the left could never guess who they are. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton supports traditional marriage between a man and a woman. I’ve wouldn’t have never thought it to be honest, but she does support it. I haven’t heard any attacks by the left against Hillary for her views on the matter. It makes me wonder does the left truly care about people that are against gay marriage, or do they only care when it's conservatives expressing their disapproval? The liberal’s fanatic obsession for Barack Obama holds no bounds, but I wonder would that change if they knew he also supports traditional marriage between one man and one woman. It took me awhile to remember this event, but I remember Obama stating his position on traditional marriage during the Rick Warren forum at the Saddleback Church last year. No negative reactions from the left ever came about over Obama's words.

So with two very well know liberals in Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton both sharing the exact same stance on traditional marriage, will the homosexual militants and liberals in general attack Obama and Clinton like they have with Sarah Palin and Carrie Prejean? I don’t think they will even if they knew. Hypocrisy runs through the blood of liberals. I know they’ll never call Obama a “bigot” or “homophobe”. I wonder what would have happened if Perez Hilton would have asked his question about the support of gay marriage to Barack Obama instead of Carrie Prejean. Would Perez Hilton still have had his flaming hissy fit?

Thursday, May 14, 2009

Time for Colin Powell to exit "party left" Part 2

History has proven that moderate Republicans simply can't beat liberal Democrats in Presidential Elections. Gerald Ford lost to Jimmy Carter. Bob Dole lost to Bill Clinton and John McCain lost to Barack Obama. The moderate wings of the GOP had to blame Palin in order to keep alive the "myth" that the GOP has to move to the center in order to be viable. This is where their argument collapse upon itself like a house of cards. If the country truly became a "center" balanced nation, why did Obama beat McCain? Obama isn't a centrist. He's as left as left can get. Here's the second argument. If Palin was the "weak point" of the McCain ticket due to her being "polarizing" according to Colin Powell, how did George Bush win two terms with Dick Cheney? Dick Cheney was actually way more conservative then George Bush. The left loathed Dick Cheney. The media had vodoo dolls of Cheney. Cheney was portrayed as the puppeteer of Bush, yet Bush won two terms with him on the ticket. This goes to show why it is absurd to even believe for one minute that the country has changed in five years from center-right to the center during the time Bush was re-elected in 2004 until Obama was elected in 2009. Powell's is so caught up in his ego, he can't even see what is right in front of his face. Americans don't want "bigger government". They also don't want to "pay more in taxes". Powell is out of touch with not only the GOP, he's out of touch with the nation in general. That is why most people believe the GOP "doesn't have a message". The party should be listening to people like Rush Limbaugh, Jim DeMint, Tom Tancredo, Duncan Hunter, Mark Levin, Tom Mc Clintock, Mark Sanford, Bobby Jindal, Mitt Romney and yes Sarah Palin. These people shared the views of what made the GOP a majority party on the congressional and presidential level. Colin Powell has proven that he can run his mouth and not have a clue about what the American people want from their elected officials. I agree with Limbaugh. It is time for Powell to follow the Arlen Specter's lead and change his voter's registration card from Republican to Democrat.

Time for Colin Powell to exit "party left" Part 1

Moderate Republicans make me as ill as liberal Democrats. One of the biggest marketing slogans of the GOP is also its biggest weakness. The Republican Party refers to itself as the “big tent party”. The title describes what it really is. It’s more or less a three ring political party circus. In the first ring, there are the liberal Republicans. People like Governor Arnold Schwarznegger, Senator Olympia and Senator Susan Collins and General Colin Powell represent them. In the second ring are the moderate Republicans. Senator John McCain, Senator Lindsey Graham, Former President George Bush represents them; in the third ring are the conservative Republicans. Senator Jim Demint, Congressman Ron Paul, Former Vice President Dick Cheney. I can go on and on, and I wouldn’t even scratch the surface. I’ve commented on the problems of the GOP for almost three years now. I started speaking out the day after republicans lost control of congress in 2006. It’s pretty sad that the GOP has become a party of slow learners to such and easy to understand explanation on why they lost in 2006 and the presidency in 2008. I’ve been listening to Colin “Blow” Powell flap his gums to any liberal media outlet that woulld listen. He’s been making his rounds attacking Rush Limbaugh, Dick Cheney, Ann Coulter and Governor Sarah Palin as to “what is wrong with the GOP”. Powell comes off sounding like the crazy uncle of a person that lives in the attic. Powell may think he has some “influence” within the Republican Party, but he is sadly mistaken. Liberal “Democrats” will give Powell a forum in which be can present himself as something that he isn't. They only do it, because he fulfills the role of their "useful idiot".

Sure the liberal and moderate wings within the Republican Party are trying to gain control, but Powell isn’t their leader or even an influential player with in their ranks. Last year yet again demonstrated something that history has proven out. Liberal and moderate Republicans can’t win elections. John McLame was the moderate Republican’s “prototype” candidate. McCain was supposed to have ushered in a new era and identity for the Republican Party as the “party of the center”. The party was over on November 4th 2008, and they still haven’t wised up yet it appears. By Powell endorsing Obama, he not only backstabbed his so called“beloved friend” that being McCain; he also went against the candidate that represented the ideology that he claimed the party should represent. Dick Cheney said it best.

This is a must read story by Jeff Jacoby of the Boston Globe entitled "The party of Colin Powell". Mr. Jacoby spelled out in detail how Colin Powell's own actions and statements have harmed his status within the Republican Party.

Monday, May 11, 2009

Proof that roaches can evolve into human beings.

This is what the human equivalent of a two-legged cockroach looks and sounds like with the lights on. Meet the mutated spaceman known a Wanda Sykes. She has been passed off in the human world as a comedian. This so called comedian was invited to the White House Correspondents Dinner last night. Nothing she said in her routine was tasteful or respectful at all.

She made "joking" references to Rush Limbaugh being the "20th hijacker" of 911. She also wished that Rush Limbaugh’s kidneys would fail in her routine. Liberals falsely accuse conservatives of using “hate speech”, however it always seems that the evidence of this hate speech they talk about so much leads right back to their own mouths. Wanda Sykes is the perfect example of that. She attacked Sean Hannity as a person that would never fly coach. I don’t believe any rich liberals fly coach or even first class for that matter. They have their own “private planes” for that. Wanda Sykes is a disgusting comedian and a poor excuse for a human being. She just may be related to another disgusting female comedian and human being by the name of Whoopi Goldberg. I can only image what the national outrage would be among liberals if Rush Limbaugh got on his microphone one day and preceded to say that he “wishes Obama’s internal organs would fail” in the near future. Rush Limbaugh would be finished in talk radio period. Wanda Sykes remarks were so distasteful in nature, but that didn't stop Obama from yucking it up over her remarks of wishing another person's death.

Even Obama’s Press Secretary Robert Gibbs was trying to distance Obama from Ms. Sykes "performance" the "next day". He cheered her performance last night. Even the radical loon bat kook liberal Keith Olberman said that Sykes was in bad taste. That says a lot about how radical her performance was.

Sunday, May 10, 2009

Two of Obama's cult members were jailed for trying to steal a picture of him.

If only I was making this stuff up. Truth is stranger then fiction, and the idol worshiping of Obama is a strange as strange can get. I guess these two brain scrubbed drones couldn't go to a store and buy a picture of Obama. They could have also just download a picture of Obama and printed it. These two solutions might not have worked for these two women; Intelligence would have been required. If only Barack would have "redistribute the wealth" of his pictures to his needy followers, his two loyal drones wouldn't have had to resorted to crime. Oh well, I guess this is an example of the dark side of "hope and change". I along with many others have been saying for almost two years now that Obama is a new age version of the cult leader Jim Jones. Barack Obama is just a political version of him. Even former congressman Tom Tancredo sees Obama as a cult leader. Radio talk show host Sean Hannity plays a clip of Obama worshippers from time to time. He does it to demonstrate how Obama's followers are fanatically mentally ill for him. Just listen, and you will see what I'm talking about.

Happy Mothers Day

Jeremiah 1.5

"Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart"

Genesis 25.22

"The children struggled together within her".

Saturday, May 09, 2009

The "Goddaughter" has a few choice words for brazen liberal cattle that want to attack the Tea Party activists.

Liberals can't seem to let the Tea Parties go. That is how you know they were a success. The same goes for Governor Palin. The election has been over for over a half a year now, but liberals can't let go of their focused hate towards her. Liberals for the most part are starting to turn down their rhetoric towards George Bush, because he is not now considered a threat to them. The Tea Party activists and Palin are a different story. Sharise aka "The Godmother" explains it very well. When you mess with one member of the family, you are messing with us all. Liberals are foolish if they think they can simply attack us without fear of any recourse. Liberals hated this round of Tea Parties, so I know they aren't going to like the second round on the 4th of July.

This is one of my recent videos that I accidentally deleted from my posts, but it fits into the scheme of Sharise's video perfectly. It is way past time for conservatives across the nation to fight back against these kooky liberal drones.

The World Premier of the Barck Obama "Under My Bus" music video starring Zo.

In mocking in grand fashion the first 100 days of the Obama "error", Zo created a music video as a recap to how our nation got to this point.

Obama Adviser: Catholic Church Insulting Jesus

I said it before that liberals want to change Christianity in order to support their perverse lifestyle. I guess thanks are in order for an Obama advisor for proving me correct. Harry Knox. is an adviser to Barack Obama's Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships. This mentally screwed up person accused Pope Benedict XVI of "insulting Jesus" in statements about condom use. This is where the story becomes laughable. Mr. Knox is a “homosexual rights activist”. I still don’t understand what rights homos don’t have that heterosexuals do have. Anyways Mr. Knox said, “The leader of the Roman Catholic Church is “hurting people in the name of Jesus” and sending the message that “violence and human rights abuses against LGBT people are acceptable.” People like Knox really irritate me for several reasons. They constantly use the approach of calling others that don’t agree with their agenda as “bigoted” or “promoting hate”. Miss California was labeled as being “anti gay” just because she supports traditional marriage. She didn’t mention or promote anything about attacking gays or lesbians. This tactic by the left really must be confronted and thrown back in their faces. I would really like to ask Mr. Knox about his religious background. The Pope doesn’t hate anyone. Knox is simply upset that traditional Christians will not alter their faith to accommodate their sinful lifestyles. I guess praying for gays and lesbians to renounce their sexual lifestyles is considered “hurting other people in the name of Jesus”. Liberals wanted a more “liberal” person to have been selected Pope when John Paul died a few years ago. They didn’t get their wish. Liberals are constantly trying to change the constitution, and their attempts to alter theological teachings are no different. If religious traditionalist supported the lifestyles of the left, they wouldn’t have a need to use attack words such as “Jesus freaks”, “Bible Thumpers” and “Holly Rollers”. The distain for Evangelical Christians by the left is due primarily because of the Christian denomination’s “traditional” beliefs. Liberals like Mr. Knox probably don’t believe that homosexuality is even a sin. Homosexuality is a sin regardless. They are only fooling themselves believing otherwise. Knox bashed the Pope back in April of 2007; he accused the Catholic Church of behavior that was “immoral and insulting to Jesus”. That statement by Knox is like the pot calling the kettle black”. If homosexuality were “moral”, the creator of all living things would have created all living things one sex. Knox went on the say that the Church's positions include “spiritual and emotional violence.” So when people commit acts that are wrong and are told they are doing wrong, is that committing spiritual and emotional violence against those who do it? These people are wrapped very tight in trying to defend their immoral behavior. The so called Christians that Obama hung around with from his Trinity days up until day are as fake and deceptive as a three dollar bill.

I made a "little" mistake.

In clearly out my archives, I deleted a little bit more then I intended to do. I accidentally deleted some of the current topics. Sorry about that everybody. I need to remind myself to seek a refund from the Al Gore technology company. I apologize. I wish I could delete Obama as easily. This is something you all might be interested in knowing. Starting next week Friday, I'm going to start producing a weekly video commentary on You Tube. I haven't come up with a new name as of yet, but I'll work on it until then.

An "unholly act" committed by the University of Notre Dame against Dr. Allen Keyes and Operation Rescue.

The University of Notre Dame should be ashamed of itself for its actions it committed against Dr. Allen Keyes and the pro life group Operation Rescue. The University of Notre Dame use to be a respectable Catholic University. Some so called churches; religious institutions and organizations have bastardized the purity of their religion by altering their religious teaching in order to accommodate the immoral lifestyles promoted constantly by the left. Unfortunately, the University of Notre Dame can also be added to this list. Any so-called religious institution that sells out its core beliefs in order to embrace a “popular politician” is a disgrace to its religion. I’m not going to candy coat reality. It is what it is. This month Barack Obama is scheduled to give the commencement address at Notre Dame. He will also receive an Honorary Doctrine from the University. Barack Obama is the most radically pro-abortion person to ever reside in the White House. It sickens me to this day knowing how religion in our country has been so polluted and watered down to accomodate sin. So many people that call themselves religious leaders supported Obama. Many of them knew his stances on abortion and gay marriage, yet they supported him anyway. Abortion is condemned in the Catholic faith,yet Notre Dame spat in the face of core doctrine. That alone is bad enough, but Notre Dame managed to sink even lower with their actions today against Dr. Alan Keyes. Dr. Keyes along with 21 other pro-life protesters from the group Operation Rescue was all arrested thanks to the actions of Notre Dame. Keyes and the other protesters “walked on campus praying quietly with baby carriages that had dolls covered with stage blood as a show of protest.”. I guess this was the “cardinal sin” the group committed that warranted the arrests? It looks like the Notre Dame officials didn’t like having to come face to face with the true consequences of their actions for inviting Barack Obama to their campus. The arresting of the members of Operation Rescue isn’t going to expunge them of their betrayal of the faith they claim to support. I won’t hold my breath expecting the media to cover this story. The media would usually chomp at the bit any other time to cover a negative story regarding a conservative or conservative group, however this story would bring attention to Obama’s radical pro abortion ideology. The University of Notre Dame needs to understand how unpopular its actions are with true Catholics and religious traditionalists. I would like to see a financial boycott by the alumni to the university. I commend Dr. Keyes and Operation Rescue for not abandoning or altering their principals in the wake of others that have in order to please a "popular politician". Real Catholic Telvision weighs in on the invitation of Obama to Notre Dame, and I couldn't agree more. The acts of Notre Dame in favor of Obama and against Keyes is absolutely indefensable.

Radio talk show host and Catholic Laura Ingraham brought up a very direct and important question. Is the University of Notrem Dame still a "Catholic" Unversity?