Wednesday, December 29, 2010
Monday, December 27, 2010
2011 isn't going to be such a Happy New Year in the land of Hope & Change as some are thinking.
Saturday, December 25, 2010
Sunday, December 19, 2010
Secret Santas demostrate that financially well off individuals aren't evil misers as liberals would have people to believe.
If that act of selflessness by that evil rich scrooge wasn't bad enough, this should really get your blood boiling. A rich miser in Tennessee had the nerve to drop thousands of dollars into a Salvation Army's kettle in Tennessee. I'm outraged just thinking about it.
It's obvious I am being sarcastic in my comments. The fact is that people who are financially well off aren't evil people as liberals would have us all to believe. These individuals and countless more like them aren't forced to give their money to charities in order to help others. They do so, because they WANT TO. A liberal would say that those people only gave to charity to get a "tax write off". These folks can't get a tax write off since they gave the money anonymously. These were donations came from the heart of the individuals. I've never subscribed to the class warfare tactic, and I never will. By these people giving money to charities, they are doing more good for their communities and the nation then what some self righteous, arrogant politician who's apart of the government ever could do.
Saturday, December 18, 2010
The Young Men Christian Association kicks Saint Nicholas to the curb in favor of secular Political Correctness.
I received a nice email from Liz who runs exposethemedia.com. Apparently, there were many more stories in reference to the attacks on Christmas by the intolerant left then I knew about this year. Thanks Liz for the heads up. In New York City's West Village, poor Santa just doesn't cut it anymore in being an "appropriate symbol for Christmas according to some. Oh wait one second, Santa Clause is also known as "Saint" Nicholas. Saint Nicholas was actually a Christian saint. So sorry Santa, you just made the progressive's PC hit list. No wonder Saint Nicholas was replaced at the YMCA's annual "holiday" luncheon in place of a "talking snowman" this year. I'm sure the kids just loved that not so obvious "substitution", NOT! So what could have been the reason for the YMCA giving Saint Nicholas the boot this year? Well according to Mr. John Rappaport who is the executive director of the McBurney YMCA said "it wasn't replacing just transiting". If that isn't pure progressive double talk, I don't know what is. He went on to say
"We realized that change is sometimes good, and that Frosty is a great winter character who would appeal to a broader number of kids."
What Mr. Mc Rappaport is saying is that Frosty is a more suitable character for the "broader number of kids" AKA those who don't celebrate Christmas or are offended by it. Funny how these "winter characters" are never ever mentioned again after the holiday of "Christmas" is over. If progressives are so much into "winter trees" and "winter characters", why don' they keep their winter trees and winter characters displayed up until March 20th which is the official end of winter? Progressives can't spin reality no matter how hard they try. Did you all know that the YMCA was founded as Christian organization back in 1844. YMCA stand for "Young Men Christian Association". Bill Donohue of the Catholic Leagues was dead on in his outrage over what John Rappaport did.
"Christmas is not about Jack Frost; it's not about snowmen," fumed Bill Donohue of the Catholic League. "We're not talking about some secular organization that has no religious roots. If they can't celebrate Christmas, then they should check out. What a bunch of cowards."
Friday, December 17, 2010
Tell me again that Christmas isn't under attack by so called "tolerant" liberals Part 1
I'm going to put out my own video within a few days leading up to Christmas, and I will go into greater detail about the attacks by the non tolerant left on Christmas.
Wednesday, December 15, 2010
The gospel according to Chris Matthews on bearing witness to Bill & Barack standing together.
Monday, December 13, 2010
Impeached former president Clinton comes to the rescue of the inexperienced current president Obama.
You just got to laugh, when liberals and even some foolish republicans claim that a person like Sarah Palin isn't "ready" to be president or "lacks the experience". When I witness on a daily basis how much of a disaster Barack Obama has been in the position of president, I know how fraudulent the claims are by liberals about Palin, because Obama's supporters still support Obama tooth and nail regardless. Barry has never held any positions that called for "leadership" experience. That lack of experience has shown it's ugly head on many occasions. Obama has become toxic to the democratic party in less then two years. It took Bush six years to become toxic to the republican party. Obama has become so weak as a leader, he had to go out and ask his enemy and impeached former president William Jefferson Clinton to help him try and sell Obama's tax comprise bill to Democrats in congress. At Friday's press conference, former president Clinton actually took over questions from Obama that Obama or his press secretary Gibbs should have been answering.
Watching Bill answering the questions from the press made me think is Obama truly in over his head? In the eight years of the Bush Administration, I don't believe I witnessed one time Bush's daddy Herbert Walker coming in to field questions for his son George. Bush was not my ideal president, but at least the man took care of "his own presidential business". The excuse that Obama gave to allow himself to leave the press conference was shallow. “I’ve been keeping the first lady waiting so I’m going to take off.” The tax cut extension is the biggest legislation facing the country right now, and Obama pretty much said that "not keeping his wife waiting" was more important then answering the questions from his lap dog press about the current state of the legislation. I thought for a second I was in a time warp watching and listening to Bill appear as the president while the press referred to Bill as "Mr. President". I have to question Bill's motives for coming to the rookie's aid. It would give Bill and Hillary much pleasure to watch Obama's presidency crash and burn, but Bill likes the attention, and I believe he sees a role of being able to come in a play the hero in saving the Democratic Party from Obama.
Friday, December 10, 2010
In the era of Hope & Change, why is former president George W Bush's approval rating higher then that of Barry O?
I guess the old saying is true. Absence makes the heart grow fonder. In the case of former president George W Bush, I would never have thought that would be the case for most Americans. According to a Gallup poll, former president George W Bush has a higher job approval number then Barack Obama. No, this isn't an April Fools joke. What I find fascinating about former president's Bush's approval numbers is that they have sharply increased since he left office. Bush's approval rating was at 25% once he left office. Now it's around 47%. I believe people are looking back at the Bush years and are realizing some very key contrasts as compared to the current Obama years. For six out of the eight years under the Bush administration the economy was in pretty much decent shape. The unemployment rate was near full employment at 5.3% Sometimes you never know how good you had something until it is gone. Bush was still a big government republican who didn't veto any spending bills, but at least he wasn't Obama. Two weeks ago, Bush was on the Jay Leno show to promote his book "Decision Points". The audience was very gracious to Bush, not one person booed him. When Bush made the reference about one of his proudest accomplishments being that he kept the homeland safe, the audience gave him a thunderous applause.If Obama keeps being himself, pretty soon even Jimmy Carter may look more appealing. On second thought, I take that back for now.
Monday, December 06, 2010
Why can't liberals comprehend the difference between "extending current tax rates" and "giving a tax cut"?
Wednesday, December 01, 2010
The GOP embracing Joe Scarborough's insanity about Palin being the real enemy is as smart as sticking a wet finger into an electrical outlet.
When did Joe help to raise money for candidates during the midterm cycle? The old saying goes "put up or shut up". Joe hasn't put up nor will he put up anything, so it is about time for him to shut up! Joe spends most of his time attacking other conservatives and Palin then he does Obama and company? Speaking for myself as a true conservative, why would I ever attack another conservative who is standing up for principal? Why would I listen to such a person who attacks true conservatives? It doesn't make sense. This is why Joe Scaroborugh isn't fooling anyone except himself and gullible liberals who actually watch him. Real conservatives aren't buying his crap. The media is carrying his anti Palin buckets of water obviously, but that's about it. Neophytes like Joe wish they had the influence and power that people like Palin, Limbaugh, Beck, Levin and others have. I'm sure people like Karl Rove, Charles Krauthammer, Barbara Bush, Colin Powell and others hang on Joe's every word, but the real folks who reside in mainstream America could care less. Joe Scarborough doesn't represent nor speak for us. If the GOP is stupid enough to follow Scarborough's advice, they might as well stick a knife into the heart in which people like Palin helped to fix. It was Barbara Bush's little boy George W along with the political hack Karl Rove and others that wrecked the GOP in the first place which helped lay the ground work for Obama's victory. I'm sure Joe would never want to talk about that little fact. It would be too much like right to do so. Joe is so stupid, he couldn't even give a factual snide remark about Palin. He referred to her as a "quarter termer". Since governors serve four year terms, a quarter term is "1 YEAR". So much for intellectual proweless Joe. I don't recall Joe ever criticizing Obama for being a "half term" U.S Senator. Then again liberals never do say anything about that. They want to simply brush that aside and shine the light on Palin. Liberals are so disingenuous. I've noticed a fascinating trend forming in regards to the attacks on Palin. Every time a GOP party hack attacks Palin, it appears that the attack never reaches Palin but is blown right back at the person who made the attack. The blow back by conservatives against Joe has been fast and furious. Like I said before, Joe doesn't represent conservatives. With the GOP at the state and national level feeling the impact from the drying up of donations from regular small time contributors, would the GOP once again be stupid enough to yield Joe Scarborough's so called "advice"? Oh to comment on what Joe wrote, it was Palin who endorsed Marco Rubio in the Florida primaries. Also Marco is a Tea Party guy as well. Joe doesn't like the Tea Party either. Also, Reagan was referred to as an anti intellect and a "trouble maker" within the GOP. Can someone please educate Joe, and bring him up to speed before he gives more "advice"?Mark Levin laid out on his show exactly why the attacks against Palin are so weak, and he also takes Joe and other neo cons to task.
This is what "biased news" reporting really looks like.
Chris Jansing isn't a News Commentator, she is suppose to be a News Anchor. It's no big deal if Chris Matthews, Keith Olberman, Rachael Madcow or Ed Schultz calls Steven King a "far right winger". Of course they would be wrong in their classification of King, but these people are getting paid to give their opinion as commentators. With MSNBC, where does their bias end and the news begin? This is why MSNBC is a second rate joke., and Fox News is number one.
Leave it to a white liberal to call a black conservative "bigoted and ignorant".
Oh yeah, I forgot to mention that West was right in his comment that Washington DC is immune to layoffs. I would wager that Ed didn't take time to educate himself by reading the story from BNet about why young people go to Washington DC to find work. They love the government jobs. A few months ago, the job search engine site juju released their rankings of the cities that are the easiest to find a job and the cities that are the most difficult to find employment. The city that was ranked number one in being the "easiest" to find a job was WASHINGTON DC. So the person who is the victim of his own ignorance is Ed Shultz, but we all pretty much knew that anyways.