Wake up Black America

What are "cracker" counties?

2012-01-31T12:14:00.004-04:00

What would be the response if political analyst for Fox News would have said while reporting in Florida that Obama would do well in the lower part of Florida which is mostly nigger counties. That person would be fired 30 seconds after his segment ended and rightfully so by the way. Rogers Alies of Fox News would be apologizing repeatedly for what was said. Progressives would be demanding for advertisers to pull their spots from Fox News immediately. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton and others in the Civil Rights industry would be calling for boycotts and protests of Fox News. Also, congress would no doubt try to get involved for grandstanding purposes. What I am saying is that it's pretty obvious what would happen if such an incident arose on Fox News. Well, lets say that the incident was reversed. Lets say that instead of the News Channel being Fox News it was MSNBC, and let's go further in saying that the person didn't call the area "nigger counties" but instead referred to it as "cracker counties", and the candidate who was reported to do well in those counties wasn't Barack Obama but instead Newt Gingrich, what would be the response then? Of course I am just making this all up, I mean nobody like lets say the Politico's Jonathan Martin would ever make such a racist statement like that, right?

MSNBC Analyst Melissa Harris-Perry compared Governor Jane Brewer to a white segregationist who talked down to kids?

2012-01-27T11:21:00.010-04:00

As always with MSNBC, it's all race, all the time, 24/7.The other day Barack Obama landed in Arizona, and Governor Jane Brewer was there to meet him. They exchanged greetings-and then had a momentary exchange on the immigration issue and what Jane wrote about Obama in her book which Obama took exception to. Nobody in their right mind would have thought much of a governor and a president of two opposing political parties having a momentary exchange on an issue. The media blew it up to be more then what it really was of course, because it was Obama who was involved. However, one has to look at the equation involved through the eyes of progressives in the media. White Female Republican Governor + Black Male Democratic President = Another opportunity to make a non issue into a racial one by the racial antagonists over at MSNBC.

So Governor Jane Brewer must be some sort of an iconic civil rights era throwback segregationist, because she shook her finger in a heated exchange with Obama? If Governor Brewer was a Democrat, this wouldn't even have been covered by the media nor discussed as a racial issue on MSNBC. How can race relations in this country ever improve when progressives keep using race in order to stir up the pot in regards to political issues? The problem with race rests in the lap of people such as Melissa-Harris Perry. People like her branded Governor Brewer as a racist simply, because she tried to protect her state from being overrun by illegal aliens. I will repeat what I have always said about MSNBC. They barely have any viewers for a reason, and America is better off because of it. If you thought the race card was played in 2008 by the left, buckle up, because you haven't seen nothing yet in this election year. It's just beginning. FYI: The black race hustler Al Sharpton is still gainfully employed with MSNBC. I just thought I would share that.

I didn't watch the SOTU address last night for one simple reason.

2012-01-25T11:07:00.004-04:00

I knew Obama was going to deliver his same old tired class warfare, socialist BS that he has done from his first SOTU address. Apparently, I was right on target.

Since Obama has no accomplishments he can speak of that has helped the American people even to this day, no wonder he has to keep recycling his past SOTU speeches by changing the wording just to give a hint that he is saying something original.

Gingrich wins South Carolina

2012-01-22T11:37:00.003-04:00

The Republican establishment and the Romney camp must be wondering this morning what in the world happened to them yesterday in South Carolina. It doesn't pay to focus on what the so called pundits say, because most of the time they're wrong anyways. Newt Gingrich was shown Friday as being ahead of Mitt Romney in the polls, Some predicted the contest was going to be close,they couldn't have been more wrong. Newt not only beat Romney in the South Primary, he trounced him by getting 40% of the vote to Romney's 28%. Newt should thank the media for unknowingly helping to make his win possible. Last week has been the ultimate week of mishaps for progressives in the media hell bent on taking down Gingrich. Juan Williams took his shot at Gingrich in the Fox News debate and failed. Newt's smack down of Juan is what helped him to start the rise in the polls in South Carolina. What gave him his rocketing momentum was when he embarrassed the CNN moderator John King and the national media in the Thursday night debate. John King opened the debate by questioning Newt over his ex wife's allegation that he said that he wanted to have an open marriage. The audience didn't like that question and Newt didn't appreciate it either.

I'm not sure what John King thought he was going to accomplish by asking Newt that question. He must didn't learn the lesson Juan Williams was taught just a few days earlier. The GOP nomination was all but a lock for Romney according to the wizards of politics just a few weeks ago, now they don't know what to say. Santorum was awarded Iowa after the recount, Romney won New Hampshire, and now Newt has won South Carolina. The question that needs to be asked is obvious going forward for the Romney campaign. Romney did terrible in southern primaries back in 2008. Is this the beginning of a repeat? Romney didn't just lose by 12 percentage points in South Carolina, he lost by double digits even with the endorsement of the Governor Nikki Haley, more money, a professional political ground game etc. Even though Romney has the money to media blanket the large state of Florida, I have to wonder will that be enough. Rick Santorum might as well drop out. He finished with 10% of the vote yesterday. For him to claim to be a social conservative and yet finished in last place in a social conservative state should have been a wake up call to him, but he said he's still going forward to Florida. It looks like as of now there is no real front runner.

Juan Williams learned a very valuable lesson about what GOP candidate can be race baited and which one can't.

2012-01-19T12:12:00.003-04:00

I watched the South Carolina GOP debate Monday night. It was a decent debate for the most part. Fox News was sponsoring it, and one of the questionnaires was Juan Williams. Since the debate was held on Martin Luther King day, it was easy to figure out what was going to happen. Combine a black progressive, Dr. King Day and a Republican Debate in the southern state of South Carolina. Now mix it all together. Juan Williams made the foolish mistake of trying to corner Newt Gingrich on a comment he made the following week about the work ethic among the poor and the issue about food stamps. Newt said

"blacks should demand jobs not food stamps"

Newt was 100% right, but Juan took exception to that comment and decided to use Newt's comment back at him in the debate, BAD MISTAKE!!!

It was foolish of Juan to think that a person like Newt Gingrich was going to bite his tongue on something he said, especially if he knew he was right when he said it. Newt is a very cerebral thinker. He's like me. We tend to stand our ground on something we know to be right, and we tend to provide evidence to it back up. Progressives have always been know to burn the candle of race and welfare on both ends. When people mention anything about the blacks and welfare, progressives will usually be quick to mention that

"more whites are on welfare then blacks".

That is a true statement, because there are "more whites in America then blacks based on "population". That's only one side of the candle. When Republicans talk about reforming welfare so that it doesn't become an indefinite entitlement to the recipient and robs the recipient of his or her work ethic to stand on their own two feet, then progressives claim that

"welfare reform will adversely impact blacks and minorities the hardest"

So welfare advocates play both ends of the debate to try to have their cake and eat it too. I have zero problem with what Newt said. My first job was when I was 16, I worked at McDonalds. Hell, I had to clean out the bathrooms to. I had to flip burgers etc. I hated the job, but loved pay days, because I knew I earned that money. Because I started work at a young age, I understood not only the importance of work but also how important it was to budget money even though it was a part time job. Progressives always cry about young people not having anything to do in order to stay out of trouble, it seems obvious to me that if they are working, they can't get into any trouble. Somethings are just common sense like Newt demonstrated. The media and progressives were quick to come out and try to down play Newt's reference that Obama is the "foodstamp president". They claim that Newt is wrong. The fact is that more people are on food stamps then under any other president. Progressives are praying for Romney to win the nomination, because they know that Obama can't debate Gingrich if his life depended on it.

Only on MSNBC can Mitt Romney be considered a racist for giving money to a black woman in need.

2012-01-16T20:47:00.007-04:00

MSNBC is such a pathetic joke. For those of you who think it isn't, stop kidding yourselves. Only in bizzaro land known as the twenty four hour race baiting progressive front known as MSBNC could Mitt Romney be branded a racist for giving money to a black woman in need. On the MSNBC 'show"Now With Alex Wagner," panelist Joy Ann-Reid claimed that a spontaneous act of goodwill by Mitt Romney by giving money to a black woman"played into a certain narrative by conservatives that "

"You don't need actual programs that the government puts in place to help people in need; 'We'll just give them charity. The church will take care of them. I'll give them fifty bucks." Janell Ross later chimed in to lament the woman's thankfulness, including her thanks to God for Romney's assistance. I guess the panelists are ok with blacks being on the government dole instead of being helped directly by a person individual choice of giving."

I know the panelists are Marxists who subscribe to the notion that there is "economic inequality" and such, but these people are beyond being off their meds. Of course I would have chomped at the bit to have been a panelist on that show just for the sole purpose of embarrassing each and every one of them including Janell Ross and especially Joy-Ann Reid. This is my problem with intellectual fruit loops who support her way of thinking on this. They have a problem that Mitt Romney gave money from his own personal wealth to help another person in need, but they DON'T have a problem and actually support the government taking other people's money through taxation in order to give the impression that they are helping those in need. Progressives believe that the government's role is to be the nation's charity through forced givings by the taxpayers. Conservatives believe that charity is something that is voluntary and should be left up to the individual to give what he or she sees fit and to the causes they support. Every year I give money to the Salvation Army. I do it, because it makes me feel good, and I like the mission of the charity. I also do it, because I know that private charities are in the business of helping people. They spend donations in the most efficient manor possible in order to help the most people. They stretch every dollar. The government does the opposite. They waste tax payer's money, and the money they waste rarely if ever even helps the people that need it. I can fault Romney on many things, but this isn't one of them. The so called federal government's "War On Poverty" has been going on for almost fifty years, and there is no end in sight. The government always claims it needs more and more money in order to fight this war, yet it only leaves tax payers poorer and poorer. If Romney wouldn't have given that lady fifty dollars, then Romney would have been called a racist for not giving that black lady any help. Romney was going to be called the racist bad guy regardless of his actions. I bet Joy Ann-Reid had no problem with blacks in Detroit being joyful in 2009, when they "THOUGHT" they were going to receive free government stimulus money . Yeah, I'm pretty sure she had no problem with that. I wonder did they play into a stereotype according to her?

Giving money to a person in need out of your own wealth BAD, people seeking free money from tax payers GOOD, right?

Rick Santorum is a FAKE and is ANTI TEA PARTY.

2012-01-15T23:35:00.003-04:00

As of today, I am no longer supporting Rick Santorum for President and I urge Tea Party voters to do the same. Millions of Tea Party voters have been played. I have to unfortunately put myself into that category. Everyone who has read this blog knows that I placed my support behind Rick Santorum to win the GOP nomination a few weeks ago. All I can say is that, nobody is perfect. I mad a mistake. Rick Santorum has been going around on the campaign stumps trying to convince Tea Party folks and conservatives in general that he is the only consistent conservative in the race. I bought that line, but I should have done more research on Santorum. I just found out today that there really is no difference between him and Mitt Romney. The Republican establishment hates the Tea Party and apparently Rick Santorum feels the same way, he just hasn't told them that. A friend sent me this video today. Judge for yourself.

There isn't a logic explanation that Santorum can give to his own words. Tea Party voters need to be aware of how Rick Santorum truly feels about them. He is a fake, and he needs to be exposed for such. For the record, I still do not support Ron Paul for president. I'm just using the video to highlight Santorum. I don't now what kind of conservative Santorum claims to be. Obviously he isn't a fiscal conservative, because that is the platform of the Tea Party. Maybe Santorum supports big government neo conservatism. It sounds that way to me, but it isn't the real thing and neither is he.

Remember when progressives used the term "crony capitalism" back during the days of the Bush administration?

2012-01-14T23:12:00.004-04:00

Ah, nothing like the good ol days. I remember when Bush selected Halliburton's services division KBR to provide services for the military in Iraq, all I ever heard by the left was that George Bush was giving no bid contract to Halliburton. The term "crony capitalism" popped up shortly after, and it became a main catch phrase used to death by the left in their attacks against Bush and Halliburton. What a difference a new administration makes. These days you would be hard pressed to find those vocal progressives who yelled at the top of their lungs just a few years ago about Bush stealing taxpayer money to give to his corporate friends and donors saying anything about what is going on right now under their noses. Under the Obama administration, progressives have lost their voice for some reason in being outraged at the outright theft that is taking place by Barack Obama and his administration from the American people. Some of you may have heard about the $500 million dollar government backed loan made by the Obama Department of Energy to the now bankrupt Solar Energy company Solyndra. The founder of Soyndra just happened to be a fund raiser for Obama. Anyways, Solyndra seems to be just the tip of the iceberg in Obama's Department of Energy wasting good money after bad in giving guaranteed loans to alternative energy companies that have ultimately failed or are on the verge of doing so. Oddly enough, I have to give a credit to CBS News for actually doing some legitimate investigative journalism. Here's hoping this is the start of a trend on their part.

I thought the role of the government was for them to be the "good stewards" of the tax payer's money. I would never lend money to a company I knew was on shaky financial ground. It makes me sick hearing Obama and progressives always cry about the 1% of tax payers supposedly not paying their "fair share" in taxes, even though they actually pay more. Tax payers in general regardless of income bracket should be outraged beyond sanity that their government is in essence pissing away their hard earned money like shooting dice at a craps table. So is this why upper income earners should pay more in taxes, so that it can be wasted like this?

McCain endorses Obama at Romney event.

2012-01-12T13:26:00.002-04:00

I guess John McCain got so use to praising Obama when they both were running for president, old habits die hard. While campaigning in Charleston South Carolina last week for Mitt Romney, Mr. Straight Talk Express got derailed in giving his endorsement for the man running for president. Let's just say that it wasn't Romney.

No wonder I have to keep reminding myself to this day that the only reason I voted was to vote for Palin.

It's a MIRACLE!!!! The Pittsburgh Steelers got Tebowed in Denver.

2012-01-09T11:46:00.005-04:00

For those of you who didn't watch the Denver Broncos-Pittsburgh Steelers game yesterday, you missed a great game. Those who didn't watch the game probably assumed like most that Tim Tebow and the Broncos were simply going to be destroyed by the Steelers. Tim's critics "who mostly don't like him because of his open faith in Jesus Christ" were silently hoping for him to fail. They were trying to create a notion that Coach Fox of the Denver Broncos might put in the backup quarterback Brady Quinn if Tebow struggled in the first half. Coach Fox never eluded to that. It was simply made up by the media in an attempt to create a narrative that Fox might buy into doing. If Tebow would have failed in that game, the media would have gone into overdrive in claiming that Tim was not a quality starting quarterback in the NFL. Tim Tebow and the Denver Broncos beat the number one ranked defense Pittsburgh Steelers in overtime yesterday. I have to admit, I was cheering on Tebow for other reasons other then him being a Christan who isn't ashamed to express his faith. Since the Pittsburgh Steelers are the hated rivals of the Baltimore Ravens and vice versa, me and other Raven fans took great delight in Tebow passing for over 316 yards on them and scoring one of the biggest upsets in NFL Playoff history. This is how he closed the mouths of his critics at least for a week.

Santorum and Newt to join forces to try and take down Romney?

2012-01-06T01:13:00.003-04:00

I made the prediction that Rick Santorum was going to shake up the Republican presidential race, and I was proven right yet again. Though Rick Santorum lost the Iowa Caucus to Mittens Romney by a mere 8 votes, Rick truly was the big winner of the night hands down. Even though Mittens won Iowa, his win was by far non impressive, and his Republican establishment base should be very troubled by it. Rick Santorum was for the most part written off for dead. He had hardly any money, non existent name recognition up until recently. On the other hand, Mitt Romney had the money, the name recognition, the backing of the Republican establishment, and the on ground organization. So with all that going for him, how come he barely beat and I do mean barely beat Rick Santorum with just 8 votes? Here's another way of looking at it. Romney's victory cost him $75 dollars per vote, while Santorum's strong second place 8 vote difference finish only cost him $10 per vote.

Michelle Bachmann dropped out of the race yesterday, If she would have dropped out a few days earlier, Santorum would have beaten Romney. The 2012 Republican race is in away repeating itself in how the 2008 race unfolded. Back in 2008, Mike Huckabee didn't have a chance of beating John McCain, but he stayed in the race to make sure Mitt Romney didn't win the nomination. It was rumored that an unspoken alliance was formed between McCain and Huckabee to take down Romney. The Huckabee of this race might be Newt Gingrich. Just two weeks before the Iowa Caucus, Newt was leading Romney in most of the polls until Romney went pure negative on Newt by launching relentless negative ads against him in Iowa. Since Newt didni't have the money to launch counter ads, Romney's television ads took their toll on Newt's poll numbers and thus dropped him out of the top three. At least I can say one thing about Newt, he's not taking what happened to lying down. Matter of fact, Newt is very pissed off at Mitt Romney for what he and his supporters did to him. It would appear that Newt and Obama both have a common enemy they want to take out but for different reasons. Since Rick Santorum and Newt are friends, it's more then likely that Newt will go lightly against Rick but bring out the AK-47 against Romney. At this point, it's hard to say whether Newt is Santorum's stalking horse or is still in the race to try and win the nomination. Newt talked about a possible alliance with Rick on the Laura Ingraham show this morning.

Yesterday, John McCain endorsed Romeny. Yeah I know, what a shocker right? Well today, Juan McLame attacked Newt over his comments against Romney calling him a liar. Frankly, John needs to sit down and stay of out this. Nobody cares what he has to say. I give Newt credit for not being the push over like McCain is. I might actually have to start respecting Newt, well at least a little bit. Since the Republican establishment isn't exactly singing his praises, maybe he isn't that bad of a guy after all, time will tell.

Alan Colmes uses the death of Rick and Karen Santorum's baby boy as a political weapon.

2012-01-02T22:06:00.005-04:00

I had a dream once that I was walking in front of Alan Colmes then I slowed up and "accidentally" nailed him in his face with my elbow. Some dreams I wish I could revisit over and over again, that is one of them. I don't know why Roger Ailes of Fox News hired Alan Colmes to be a Political Commentator. He brings nothing of value to the Channel. Then again, Karl Rove, Geraldo and Juan Williams don't bring anything either. We all know that progressives will use any means possible in which to try and destroy a conservative. If that means using a tragic situation to do so, they'll do it. Since they can never beat a conservative on the basis of ideas, they have to go "personal" instead. In 1996, Rick Santorum's wife Karen suffered a miscarriage in the hospital. Their baby boy was named Gabriel. Rick and Karen brought home their dead son to let their kids grieve for their baby brother. This is what the compassionate progressive Alan Colmes said yesterday about an ultra personal matter.

“Get a load of some of the crazy things he’s said and done, like taking his two-hour-old baby when it died right after child birth home and played with it so that his other children would know that the child was real”.

Interesting that Alan Colmes has no problem with some stranger sticking a spike in the skull of an unborn baby and sucking his or her brains out, but he took issue with how the Santorum's mourned for their dead infant boy. If I was standing in front of Alan Colmes right now, I really couldn't say that I would treat him with any ounce of respect. Karen Santorum was present yesterday as Rick responded to a person's question about the attack by Alan Colmes. As Rick explained the reason why him and his wife brought home their son, Karen started to cry saying "It’s just so inappropriate”.. It's one thing to attack Rick Santorum on his polices but bringing up Santorum's child and how his family grieved for him is beyond low and despicable even for Colmes. Alan has recently tweeted that he called Rick and Karen to apologize, but I guarantee that he only did it after the intense blow back that he received from doing it in the first place. I guess this is gutter politics at it's worst. That new tone in civility progressives were calling for sure didn't last long.

Rick Santorum's timing couldn't have been better.

2012-01-01T23:55:00.006-04:00

It's no secret that I am backing Rick Santorum to win the Republican nomination. I had a feeling a few weeks ago that he was going to get "the look" from Republicans and conservatives just as the other candidates received over the last few months. Up until recently, every Republican candidate has had their "fifteen minutes of fame" only to eventually lose it to the next flavor of the month. Rick Santorum patiently waited his turn. He made a case for himself by performing well in all of the Republican debates and just making his case in Iowa. Well, it looks like Santorum's time has come.

Many polls now have him in third place in Iowa. I'm going to go out on a climb on a prediction. I believe that Rick Santorum come Tuesday is going to either finish first or he is going to come in second. Rick has been traveling around Iowa and presenting the message that he's the only consistent conservative in the race, and people are starting to notice in Iowa and nationally. When Cain dropped out of the race, a lot of his supporters went to Newt Gingrich. When that happened and Newt went to the top of the list in the race, I openly questioned other conservatives on what was their reasoning beyond their decision to back Newt. My dislike for Newt is no big secret. Well anyways, the reason conservatives claimed to support Ginrich was ,because they believed that Newt can out debate Obama and that he is also smarter. Well I made the case that a mega mind brain isn't needed to beat Obama, because Obama isn't that smart to begin with. All that is truly needed is just a pure Conservative who isn't afraid to go after Obama. Pardon the pun, but the conservative love affair with Newt may be hitting the rocks, because Newt is plummeting in the polls. That explains why Rick Santorum is on the rise. I guess in twenty four hours I will know whether my hunch pans out or not.

A New Years resolution for those of you who regretted voting for BS in 08.

2011-12-31T15:24:00.004-04:00

Even though New Years isn't officially here until Midnight, this might be one resolution the folks who voted for Barack Obama might want to take up. For those of you who fell for the open ended bumper sticker slogans of "Yes We Can" and "Hope and Change", don't feel bad. A lot of people have been duped by Madison Avenue into buying into BS over the years. The important thing is that you have learned from your mistake. If you have an unsightly Obama/Biden bumper sticker on your ride, I might have come across a nice tool to help you rid yourself of the evidence of your BS past mistake.

No need to thank me, I'm just here to help as always.

This the first time a nativity scene was vandalized and I can care less.

2011-12-30T00:32:00.011-04:00

I've said many times before that liberalism is like a moral cancer. It spreads and spreads and spreads. Even the church isn't immune to it. Many progressives aren't big fans of Christianity, because the Christian theology goes against what progressives stand for and support. The two main stables of the culture clash between traditional Christianity and liberalism is on the topics of homosexuality and abortion. The piece of human bio waste Governor here in Maryland Martin O'Malley claims to be a Catholic, however, he's going to support legislation in the Maryland General Assembly next year to legalize gay marriage. He's pretty much a fake Christian and a fake Catholic. Anyways, all churches aren't created equal. Some churches are tradition in following the scripture as it is written, while others are progressive in ignoring what is written and instead believe that god will support their lifestyles regardless of what it is. Here's a perfect example. A vandal vandalized the nativity scene at the Claremont United Methodist Church in Southern California a few days ago. Now, you might be wondering what does this have to do with progressives and Christianity. The vandal didn't vandalize a "typical" native scene. The church had a "gay themed nativity scene".

The ironic aspect of this story is that the police are investigating the vandalism as a "hate crime" not because of the vandalism being religious in nature but because of the sexuality of the theme!! If the nativity scene was just of Joseph, Mary and the baby Jesus and the nativity scene was vandalized, the police would just shrug their shoulders and just call it a random act of vandalism. I can't understand the twisted thinking behind a gay nativity scene by a so called church in the first place, because it makes absolutely zero sense. The town of Claremont is known to be progressive. Even with that being said for the Claremont Methodist Church to display a gay nativity scene just spells disrespect to to the very faith they claim to represent. Since the church made a mockery of the nativity scene in the first place, I really can't be unnerved that a person vandalized an "alternative version" of it.

Nothing spells Christmas cheer like watching members of the Occupy family turn on one another.

2011-12-26T23:35:00.005-04:00

On Christmas Day in Nashville. It appears that two Occupy Nashville protesters weren't exactly getting along in harmony in the country music city. I thought the hatred was suppose to be aimed at those 1 percenters? I guess I am behind the times.

Feel the love!!

A Christmas Day address by the late President Ronald Wilson Reagan.

2011-12-25T14:35:00.001-04:00

Have a very Merry Christmas.

The religion of peace strikes again at churches in Nigeria on Christmas Day.

2011-12-25T12:43:00.006-04:00

I woke up this morning on Christmas Day in a pretty much good mood. That didn't last long. I made the mistake of turning on Fox News and discovering that the representatives of the "religion of peace" aka Muslim Extremists carried out terrorists attacsk in churches in Nigeria killing 27 Christians. They used five bombs in their attacks. These attacks on Churches on Christmas Day are clearly meant as an attack on Christianity by Muslim extremists. It's stories like this that makes me simply roll my eyes every time I hear brainwashed progressives put forth the notion that conservatives are anti Muslim. Clearly, the problem is that a certain percentage of Muslims have a deep hatred of Christians. Progressives have criticized conservatives in their stance against not wanting a mega mosque built near ground zero. They've been called "bigoted" and anti Muslim, Islamophobes etc. My question is this. Will progressives ever comprehend where the real hatred is coming from and towards whom? If progressives ever woke up on Christmas Day enlightened to what is going on in the world, that would indeed be a true Christmas Miracle.

The Occupy folks have taken over the North Pole.

2011-12-21T13:06:00.004-04:00

Since the social rejects, misfits and life's losers of the Occupy movement have been removed from their squatting digs across the country, they have decided to reorganize and to take over a new area. Since we are coming up on Christmas, what better place for the Occupy movement to go to then the North Pole? From a secular point of view, Christmas is one of the most capitalistic holidays we celebrate, and who is the retailer's main guy? It's Santa Clause of course. Well anyways, the occupy folks ironically needed jobs in order to survive in the North Pole, so they took jobs working at Santa's workshop. Let's just say that old habits die hard.

A voice of reason in Baltimore is no more.

2011-12-20T11:04:00.008-04:00

Ron Smith was a long time radio political commentator for 26 years on WBAL Radio 1090 here in Baltimore. He use to call himself the "the voice of reason". Most of the time, he was just that, a voice of reason. I started listening to Ron Smith back in the early 1990's. I wasn't a conservative back then, but I wasn't a progressive either. If anything, I was a middle of the road guy. As the years went by, I would call into his show from time to time and challenge him on different topics. He was always able to point out the flaws in my argument, eventhough I never told him he was right and I was wrong, lol. I developed a great admiration for Ron for his sarcastic wit in exposing just how flawed liberalism is. Slowly over time, I started becoming more and more conservative mainly,y because Ron Smith actually forced me to take a real look at the world. Many years later, I become one of his best callers on his show. People normally tell me that I apply a lot of logic to what I write. I have Ron to thank for that. Progressives are known for basing their beliefs off of emotions, but emotions aren't factual. Facts are what they are. Some people might not like to hear them, but they are what they are regardless. Ron Smith died of Pancreatic Cancer today. This was him announcing just a few weeks ago he announced the discover of his condition.

He officially retired from his show just two weeks later, when he learned that his cancer was stage 4 and was too far along to treat.

This was a classic Ron Smith moment. Right after Obama was elected, the absolute clueless, progressive dumb ass state senator Lisa Gladden made the statement that "she didn't care that Maryland was broke as long as Barack Obama was elected". All she cared about was her Obama watch. I remember saying that I wished I had a hammer so I could crush that watch right in front of her eyes. Ron of course took her stupid remarks apart in with style.

He will be sorely missed by those who turned on WBAL to listen to a voice of reason in an insane, irrational world. RIP Ron and thank you.

Progressives hate Tim Tebow NOT because he is a Christian. They are uncomfortable and hate the "kind of Christian" he is.

2011-12-16T14:17:00.005-04:00

I just got finished the video this morning, and I think I did a pretty good job explaining the true reason a certain percentage of progressives hate the air Tim Tebow breathes. It really has to do more about the type of Christian Tim Tebow is. Remember, progressives are ok with Christians as long as they don't act like one and go against what Christians support. In other words, Christians In Name Only.

The hate from the compassionate left towards Tim Tebow just keeps on coming.

2011-12-16T01:37:00.004-04:00

I so love it when progressives contradict themselves into exposing who they really are not. Contrary to who they claim to be, progressives aren't the compassionate, tolerant people they advertise themselves to be. All I can say is thank god for Tim Tebow. This one man simply by breathing is making progressives show how hate filled they truly are. Here's liberal talk show host Bill Press talking about Tim Tebow on his show. When listening to Bill, remember the narrative progressives like him always use. Conservatives are the ones who are full of hate.

I'm going to lay it out on why progressives hate Tim Tebow with such an insane passion. Tebow's Christian faith is half of it, but it goes much deeper then that. Isn't it kind of odd that it's the so called hate filled conservatives like myself who are defending Tim Tebow from the so called peace and love progressives like Bill Press?

The video that could spell the end for Mitt Romney has surfaced.

2011-12-13T12:48:00.008-04:00

Conservatives have long believed Mittens Romney to be a full pledged progressive Republican. Romney has stated otherwise, even though the evidence against him has been piling up for years. It's one thing for conservatives to call Mittens Romney a progressive to moderate Republican, but it's another thing for him to call himself that on video. This could be the equivalent of a political atomic bomb going off in his campaign. This is Mitt Romney back in 2002 running for Governor speaking to a reporter at a campaign stop.

"I am someone who is moderate"?
"My views are progressive"?

I can't wait to hear Mittens TRY to explain his own words away on this. The Republican establishment might want to take a second look at Jon Huntsman, because Romney could be toast. One excuse Romney might try to use in an attempt to explain away what he said is by saying that he only said that his views are progressive, because he was running for governor in the liberal state of Massachusetts. Even if that was true. That excuse would only add fuel to the fire of those who claim that Romney will tell people what they want to hear at a given moment just to benefit himself. So it still puts him in a no win situation with conservatives.

Occupy Baltimore has been cleared out. The trash has been removed.

2011-12-13T11:34:00.009-04:00

Occupy Baltimore is at least for the moment no more. Maybe my clueless, dim witted mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake finally figured out that most of the OB protesters are from outside of Baltimore City thus they can't vote against her in retaliation in the next election anyways. Oh well, just like with good things, all bad and goofy things must eventually come to an end also. A few months ago, I went down to McKeldin Square and talked to the Occupy Baltimore folks. Some of them were actually nice, and some were kind of off their rocker. I forgot to mention that I just happened to have been wearing my Wall Street Warrior polo shirt when I went down there. ;-) I took my flip cam with the intention of uploading it to the blog, but I forgot to make sure my batteries were fully charged. That was my Homer Simpson moment. Anyways, I talked to one guy who looked like a 23 year old hippie. He made a few valid points, but most of his others made no sense to why he and others were there. I challenged him on the theory of capitalist greed as he told me, and he really didn't have a coherent rebuttal to my point other then to say that "why does a person need all that money to live on"? Another guy I talked to was dressed up as the Grim Reaper in an attempt to mock what he believes Republicans are trying to do to senior citizens.. The reason why the whole Occupy movement failed and was destined to fail from the start is simple. These people were chasing after the wrong squirrel. They blame Wall Street for the economic mess that we are in, but the reality is that many Wall Street lobbyists on K Street have direct access to members of congress who draft the legislation that favors Wall Street. If the Occupy folks would have simply focused their attention on Congress and it's relation with Wall Street, they would have actually been taken serious as a movement. Barack Obama has raised more money from Wall Street then even Mitt Romney and all other GOP candidates, yet the clueless ones never marched once on 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. It never dawned on them that Obama is the friend of Wall Street. Protesting for the sake of protesting doesn't accomplish nothing. The whole occupy movement never had an end game, exit strategy or defined goals. As I said, it was destined to fail.

Is there something in the water that make progressives uncontrollable liars?

2011-12-13T01:16:00.005-04:00

I've been trying for the longest time to figure out the thought process of a progressive. I think that my problem is that I can't connect with irrational people. I'm not tooting my own horn as if I am some sort of Vulcan like Mr. Spock or something. These people are just who they are. They are either living in a warped mindset 24/7 or they are pathological liars who can't help from lying on a constant basis. If I was to say that the unemployment rate didn't increase under Obama, chances are many of you would be thinking that I have lost my freaking mind or must be taking some power mind altering drugs. Well, what if the Chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee Debbie Wasserman Schultz said it instead? Appearing on Fox News, Debbie Wasserman Schultz made a statement that only a person who believes 1+1=5 could accept as being true.

Liberalism is a mental disorder, is it not? How can a rational thinking Democrat not be embarrassed by Debbie Downer? Her saying that the unemployment rate hasn't increased under Obama, is like the Captain of the Titanic saying that the ship really wasn't sinking right after it struck the iceberg. The unemployment rate wasn't 8.9% when Obama took office, it was below 8%. So using common sense, that would mean that the unemployment rate went up under Obama. Obama supporters who believe Debbie Dower might want to reread what I just said a few more times so that it will click. Let me try a different approach. If more people are looking for a job now as compared to January of 2009, chances are that the unemployment rate has gone up under Obama, sorry hope and changers. Does Debbie Wasserman Schultz has a serious credibility program or a serious mental program or both. Only a person not in their right mind would believe anything that comes out of her mouth.

Remember that "right wing myth" about Obama launching his political career in the home of Weather Underground terrorist member Bill Ayers?

2011-12-08T11:42:00.001-04:00

Maybe, just maybe, that wasn't a "myth" after all.

The truth always has a funny way of coming out eventually when least expected. So much for the vast right wing conspiracy on this one.

So much for the new tone of civility right Mr. Tingles?

2011-12-08T10:33:00.004-04:00

When Congresswoman Gabriel Giffords was shot earlier this year in Arizona, progressives wasted no time in using the incident as a political weapon in which to try and silence any sort of opposition by the right to anything they do. Of course, the left has never since pronouncing the need for a new tone of civility ever once tried to live up to their empty rhetoric, shocker right? When Herman Cain was atop of the GOP leader board, the left wasted no time in using "the new tone of civility" against him by calling him an Uncle Tom, Token, Minstrel, Rapist, Dirty Old Man, Mandingo etc. Well now that Cain is gone and Ginrich is at the top, the new tone of civility by the left hasn't let up any. For the last few weeks, Chris Matthews over at MSNBC has been pretty quite. Some of my best material for the blog comes from him, so I have been patiently waiting for him to go off his meds again. Well, good things come to those who wait. Chris Matthews has launched into an attack on Ginrich yesterday, not because of his positions on the issues and what his policies are. He brought issue with Newt on something more trivial.

As most people know, I have my own issues with Newt Ginrich, but even I would never be as petty to try and make an issue about his electability based on how he looks. Our country is $15 trillion dollars in debt, millions are unemployed etc. Is this the best Chris can come up with? So Newt has a diabolical grin? So Chris thinks Newt is some sort of mad scientist or something? Note to anyone running for president now and in the future. You can't be seen a presidential if you have a perceived diabolical grin according the brilliant wisdom of one Mr. Chris Matthews. If looks determine whether a candidate passes the presidential material progress, I know Chris must have also made issue with one John Kerry back in 2004, right? Many people nicked named him "lurch" from the character from the Adams Family for a reason. Welcome back Chris, you hypocrisy and stupidity makes for great blogging, and keep up that new tone of civility for everybody to see.

Herman Cain to endorse Newt Gingrich.

2011-12-05T11:33:00.011-04:00

It is being reported that Cain will throw his support behind Newt today.

Source: Herman Cain to Endorse Newt Gingrich: MyFoxATLANTA.com

I can't say this is really any sort of shocking news. Both Newt and Cain have been good friends for well over 15 years. Newt came to the defense of Herman Cain when Ginger White talked about her alleged affair with Cain. Newt said to CBS News that the allegations didn't necessarily disqualify Cain from being president.

It could be very possible that the endorsement by Cain could be a place in line for Cain for Newt's short list of VP picks provided he wins the nomination. Newt even said back on the 16th of November that a Newt/ Herman ticket was a real possibility. Those comments were also made before the sexual allegations truly started to take their toll on Cain's campaign . It's hard to say at this point whether we have seen the last of Herman Cain. The endorsement made by Cain could carry some real weight. Since Cain was backed by the Tea Party, his endorsement could help Gingrich bridge the gap with many who sees him as being the inside the beltway GOP candidate.

The Cain train's finale destination "the scrap heap" of political history.

2011-12-04T16:19:00.009-04:00

The Cain train has been officially derailed. I was busy yesterday, so I didn't have time to comment on the "suspension" of Herman Cain's presidential bid.

I really don't know what to say about Cain's campaign to begin with. For how unorthodox it was, he actually had a shot at winning the nomination. As much as I talked about the left trying to lynch Cain based on him being a black conservative, Herman had more to do with him putting the noose around his own neck then liberals did, sad to say. Locality is a good trait to have, but something good loyality to a person can come back to hurt you in ways you would least expect it. Mark Block was Cain's campaign manager, and he was a good one at a certain level in the campaign, when Cain was back in the single digits a few months ago in the polls. Clearly Mark Block was way over his head when the allegations first broke. I remember his responses on Fox News with Geraldo when the news first broke. I had a face palm moment watching him. It wasn't really the allegations that had me sighing, it was how Block and eventually Cain reacted to it. It was well known that Bill Clinton had affairs as Governor of Arkansas, but it didn't impact him in his run for president. Clinton surrounded himself with the best political strategists in the business who could spin straw into gold if need be. Cain who talked about surrounding himself with the best minds if he was president did not have a top level crisis management team to advise him when the allegations became known. Conservatives gave Cain the benefit of the doubt for awhile thanks to the rightful distrust of the media and knowing how the Democratic operatives are known for creating false rumors about conservative and Republican candidates. The perfect example is the wild rumors and allegations that were created about Sarah Palin for well over three years. Eventhough Cain was still threading water, it was the last female Ginger White who ultimately derailed the Cain train. His supporters were ready to defend him like they have with all the other accusers, but Ginger's story was different. Her story wasn't about a one time encounter with Cain fifteen years ago, she alleged that she and Cain have had an ongoing affair for thirteen years. It wasn't until Cain admitted giving money to Ginger without his wife knowing about it that it was clear he was done as a candidate. It's ok to give people the benefit of the doubt, but this was the one instant that a story couldn't be dismissed as a left wing ploy to bring down a black conservative. I hate to sound cruel in saying this, but the imploding of Herman Cain actually is a blessing for the Republican Party and conservatives overall. I'm glad that all of this stuff has come out now prior to the primaries. Can you imagine what would have happened if this all would have broke one month before the General Election if Cain won the nomination? It would have been an easy win for Obama hands down. Sometimes things work out in ways you least expect them to. It would have been great to have had a business person as President, but we never know what the future holds. It still may happen someday if our country is still around. The only person I wanted to run for president was Sarah Palin. I liked Cain, but I never endorsed him as my candidate, because my candidate after Palin was Rick Santorum. Maybe the Cain supporters will gravitate towards him. As I see it, he's the only true conservative in the race next to Michelle Bachmann. The lesson to in the Herman Cain saga is simple. You better make sure that if you have any dirty laundry in your past and is planing on running for president as a Republican, Quit before you run. IT WILL COME OUT!

A rare time I'm glad that a process of capitalism failed.

2011-12-02T11:42:00.008-04:00

I'm a capitalist. I have no problem with people making as much money as THEY SEE FIT to make. I only have a problem when a person or company takes advantage of others in order to do so. Sometimes, however money isn't everything. What if you were a sheriff deputy or a house mover, and you had to evict a person out of their home, because the bank who holds the mortgage hired you to do so? You might say to yourself that you feel bad for the people, but you are just doing your job right? Any other time, I probably would think the exact same thing but in this case, this wasn't one of those times. Imagine if the huge mega Deutsche Bank hired you to evict a 103 year old woman and her 83 year old daughter, could you go through with it? Sometimes business isn't just business as usual. In this case, the sheriff deputies and movers felt the same way.

If the bank was a local bank instead of the colossal Deutsche Bank, I believe this issue would have been resolved a long time ago with the daughter and mother being allowed to stay in their home. Megabanks have received a lot of negative attention over the past few years. A story like this one of a mega bank wanting to evict a 103 and 83 year old woman out on the streets really doesn't help their public relations image.

Car dealer uses the occupy anti capitalists to make money selling cars.

2011-11-30T11:44:00.003-04:00

Ah, where there is a will, there is a way the saying goes. Since the 1%er elitist liberal celebs us the occupy movement for the useful idiots that they are in order to promote themselves, why shouldn't pro capitalists use them also?

Detroit: A symbol of epic failure for progressive policies and social engineering.

2011-11-29T14:01:00.004-04:00

Detroit in many ways is like my city of Baltimore. Both have been run into the ground by progressives for decades. Detroit was just run into the ground at a much faster pace then others. Progressive do not like it when Detroit is held up by the right as the poster child in demonstrating how progressive policies tend to be like a social and economic cancer that rot cities from the inside out. Detroit has been tittering on the edge for many years now, but the end may be soon near. Mayor Dave Bing is proposing laying off 1,000 workers in an attempt to reserve cash in the cash strapped city. The municipal union AFSCME isn't happy about the mayor's proposal, and they plan on fighting it.

What part of broke the municipal unions in Detroit don't seem to comprehend? T he city could be out of money by April and some are saying that is could be as early as December. This is why I have so much contempt for Public Service Unions. They are the greedy little porkers that I've long branded them as being. Detroit is in serious financial trouble, and all they can care about is themselves. Progressives always talk about "shared sacrifices", so where is it demonstrated among the municipal unions in Detroit? It's sad that the city of Detroit which was once famous for the likes of Motown and being the industrial symbol of might in America has become what it has become today. It should come as no surprise why people in the south don't want progressive transplants to relocate their.

Rap and Hip Hop: A legitimate music genre or self destructive noise?

2011-11-29T11:37:00.004-04:00

I use to be a fan of hip hop and rap music way back in the 1980's. Back then, a person actually needed to have talent in order to be called a rap "artist". Over the last twenty years, the genre of music has taken a nose dive into the sewer. A rapper's credibility isn't so much about his or her ability to be a performer. It more has to do with how many times he or she has been arrested or shot.

In Oakland eight people where shot including a 1 year old infant at a video shoot for a rap video.

I can only ask the question why a 1 year old was present at a rap video shoot. Dare I say lack of parenting common sense? I get flack from the defenders of rap music, whenever I bring up stories like this. The facts however aren't on their side. Rap music is the only genre of music with most of the CD's sold or downloaded coming with a "parental advisory" label. Some have foolishly tried to use the race card as a defense of today's rap and hiphop music. They've said that if a person is white and attacks rap and hip hop as not being music, they must be racists. On the flip side, the defenders have called blacks who don't like today's garbage known as rap as "sellouts" for speaking ill of it. Facts are still what they are. Hiphop and Rap aren't the only genre of music that blacks perform and listen to. I have never heard any violence related to the genres of Jazz, R&B, Blues, Reggae, Gospel and Soul. Maybe it's just me noticing this. I have to wonder out off all the young black men in prison, selling drugs and committing murder, what are the percentages of them who listen to Jazz, R&B, Blues, Reggae, Gospel and Soul? I would wager the percentages are next to none. There is a reason why parents who actually care about their children don't want their kids listening to rap music. Let this story out of Oakland serve as yet another example in a long list of examples why that is.

Jimmy Kimmel may have found a way to liven up the GOP debates with the help of Peanuts.

2011-11-25T18:32:00.004-04:00

I haven't been keeping up with the almost weekly GOP Presidential debates for a reason. These debates are simply planned events in order to have the GOP candidates destroy one another prior thus making it easier for Obama Also, the answers and positions of the candidates have been known for several months now. Right now, It's like watching an endless television rerun with no fresh new episode in sight. Be that as it may, Comedian Jimmy Kimmel of ABC Jimmy Kimmel Live put together a very funny skit involving the GOP candidates and the Peanuts Thanksgiving. I'm not sure what Jimmy's political leanings are, but even I couldn't help not to laugh at this.

Happy Thanksgiving

2011-11-24T11:53:00.003-04:00

Be thankful for your loved ones, family and friends. We should be thankful that America hasn't yet become what Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain have become. Be thankful that tens of millions of people are fighting in our country to preserve the American way of life. Be thankful for every breath you have in your body that god has given you. Here's President Ronald Reagan speech back in 1985 talking about the the importance of Thanksgiving.

At least some in the media aren't die heard fans of Obama the not so great.

2011-11-23T02:06:00.003-04:00

Judging by a certain gesture Russian News Anchor Tatian Limanova gave during a live broadcast, I might be willing to beat that she isn't a fan of Mr. Obama. That's not late breaking news though.

HELL HAS FROZEN OVER!! The historic tingle man crush may have run it's course.

2011-11-20T20:49:00.002-04:00

Chris Matthews has been one of Obama's most fierce and loyal supporters. He claimed when Obama spoke, he received a thrill up his leg, and that didn't happen often.

He was so mesmerized by Obama whenever he spoke, he tended to forget that Obama was black.

Well it would appear that the only thing that remains constant is change. Thhe historically documented man crush on Obama by Chris Mathews may actually indeed have run it's course.

It appears that Chris has finally discovered what many on the right have been trying to tell him for almost five years now. Obama isn't Jesus and he isn't Elvis. He can't split the red sea, He can't create world peace at the sound of his voice. Obama is like other politician who came before him. He's just an empty suit that was packaged differently. Chris asked "is this it". Yes, this is it Chris. When people pump up a person in their mind as being the greatest of the great, they tend to be in for a huge disappointment, when that person doesn't live up to their hype. How's that thrill working out for you now Chris?

Could there be an "unholy" reason why sport writers and critics hate Tim Tebow?

2011-11-19T16:25:00.006-04:00

Tim Tebow is the quarterback for the Denver Broncos. He's not the most mechanically sound quarterback to be drafted to a team, but he has a unique quality that has attracted him a large and growing number of supporters. The sports writers and his critics can't stand the attention he is getting. I think the dislike of Tim Tebows by some goes deeper then his ability to be a quality NFL quarterback. The majority of sports writers are progressives in their ideology. The two things progressives always take issue with are 1. Race and 2. Christianity. I've seen many not so good quarterback over my time, and I have never seen the amount of scrutiny by the sport writers and analysts against them like they have against Tebow. This is still Tebow's rookie year. This video is of Tim Tebow leading the Broncos over the Jets with less then a minute to go in Thursday Night's game. I believe this is the true reason for the angst against Tim Tebow by the haters, sports writers etc.

I really like this guy!!! A guy who isn't afraid to express his Christian faith and will never hide it out of the possibility of "offending someone".

Of course, I am a Raven's fan first and foremost, but I do wish Tim Tebow all the best until he faces the Ravens if that ever happens. The NFL has it's share of social trouble makers and misfits. Tim Tebow is a refreshing addition to the NFL and dare I say might say actually improve it's image.

Just when you thought Barack Obama wasn't manly enough, then this comes along,

2011-11-17T00:19:00.005-04:00

Ok, sorry if I grossed anyone out. It's been said that Obama hasn't met a dictator who's ass he wouldn't kiss. Obama hasn't gone homosexual on anyone that I know of. I'm sure Moochelle would be the first to know if he was kind of lite in the loafers so to speak. These pictures are apart of some ad campaign by the Italian marketing group Benton for the "unhate" foundation. Now I can go and have my eyes washed out with bleach. lol

OCCUPY: The movement that was doomed from the start.

2011-11-15T12:13:00.001-04:00

The Occupy Wall Street movement aka OWS was destined to become a national joke from the very beginning. The original intent was to try and create a progressive version of the Tea Party movement. It appears that that grand experiment has become an utter failure. Any true organization movement has to have a core purpose, and when the OWS protesters ddn't even know why they were there, it was just a matter of time before the wheels came flying off this so called grass roots movement. The requests made by the OWS movement were laughable and absurd. One request was to eliminate money. Yeah, wait for that to happen. Nobody can say why the OWS movement started taking over other areas cross the country. At that point, that is when it's core message about it's purpose to protest Wall Street became diluted and clouded. As of today, the police across the country are cleaning out the vermin known as Occupy crowd. Things have been happening in the Occupy areas that you would NEVER, EVER see at any Tea Party event across the country. In the Occupy areas

women have been raped

drugs have been sold

a person was shot

the areas have become hygienic hazard and community health concern

fights were breaking out

thefts were accruing in and around occupy camps

vandalism of private and public property

Well apparently the good times have come to an end.

I'm trying to remember the last time a Tea Party event resembled anything like the Occupy movement. For some reason, my mind is drawing a complete blank. These bottom feeders of society crack me up. They have become nothing more then public squatters, yet they have the absolute nerve to believe they are entitled to do it. The public areas that they are trespassing on belong to the tax paying citizens who live in their perspective cities across the country. The Occupy vermin do not work thus don't pay taxes are infringing on the rights of the true property owners, the tax payers. That is what the media isn't reporting. I would wager that these crack downs by the police across the country is a direct result of citizens finally saying enough is enough. Amazing that two months ago, Democratic politicians were applauding this movement, now they have distanced themselves from it once they have discovered how badly it has turned out. I said earlier that the Occupy folks aren't exactly the sharpest knives in the drawer. Let me demonstrate what I mean. About 30 Occupy Wall Street protesters interrupted a foreign policy speech by Republican presidential candidate Michele Bachmann in South Carolina.

If these drones would have done any research on Michelle Bachmann, they would have found out that she VOTED AGAINST THE WALL STREET TARP BAILOUT IN 2008.These idiots didn't even realize that she was actually on their side. Once again, no core focus, no legitimate message. When you build a movement on a weak foundation, don't be surprised,when it comes tumbling down.

Private Investigator uses voice technology and proclaims someone is lying and someone is telling the truth. Take a guess who's doing what.

2011-11-10T10:18:00.004-04:00

This might be a video that anti Cain folks may not want to watch. It's hard for accusers to present any evidence of wrong doing if the accused is an innocent man. If there isn't any stain, how can you blame Cain?

Just a quick side note. Judging from last night, I think Cain is going to be just fine.

Meet Herman Cain accuser Sharon Bialek

2011-11-08T02:27:00.010-04:00

I've gotten to the point where I am completely disgusted by progressives and their despicable actions. These two faced, brainwashed loathsome sheeples have come to show normal people just how low they can sink, when they want to attack and destroy any person who isn't like them.. Progressives have shown themselves over and over to be the true racists they "allege" conservatives are. I don't care how many times they try to deflect their racism off of themselves and onto the right, their true colors show every time a minority who isn't a progressive comes forward aka Herman Cain.What is happening to Cain is anything less then shameful and despicable, but that is how progressives operate. The ends justify the means and nothing else matters.

The definition of the word allegation by the way is "A claim or assertion that someone has done something illegal or wrong, typically one made without proof." The last two words are important in the definition, WITHOUT PROOF". Anyone can make an allegation about anybody. It's only when evidence is provided that the allegation becomes a "case".

Today, a fourth woman has come forward with her lawyer the ultra progressive democrat hack Gloria Allred. When I heard that the "accuser" Sharon Bialek hired Allred as her Attorney, Ms Bialek's credibility immediately went out the window before even knowing anything about her. Gloria Allred accused the Duke Lacrosse players of raping the black stripper Crystal Gail Magnum back in 2006. She's also the same attorney who represented the illegal housekeeper of then Republican California Gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman. As I said before, this woman is a hardcore progressive celebrity hack lawyer. It looks like the strategy by the left is to try and destroy Cain by the process of a death by a thousand cuts or in this case a political death by a thousand allegations. With progressives, it's never about having to prove anything, when they smear conservatives. It's about "the seriousness of the charge".

The case against Bill Clinton was made, because the evidence was there to support the allegations against him.

This is what is so sad about the lynching of Herman Cain, there is no evidence hence forth, there is no case against him. It's hypocritical of course for progressives and the media to relentlessly go after Cain with no evidence to warrant it, when these exact same people tried to explain away Clinton's admitted and proven activities with Monica Lewinsky. I watched the Gloria and Sharon press conference. I really didn't think much of it at the time. I figured now that one of the supposed victims had stepped out into the light, things would start to be revealed about the accuser.

Why didn't she go to the Human Resources department of the NRA instead? Why did she fly to Washington, agree to go to dinner just so Herman could ask her "why are you here"? Another question I can't stop thinking about, how is it that Sharon Bialek came into contact with Gloria Allred in the first place? Gloria is a very high priced attorney.

How is it that a woman who doesn't even have a job can afford an attorney like Gloria Allred?

How did a woman who isn't politically connect come in contact with Gloria Allred?

If Sharon came forward merely to do the right thing, why didn't she come forward as with the rest of these women when Cain was running for the U.S Senate in Georgia back in 2004?

Why didn't any of the women step forward when Cain was still at the bottom of the polls and wsa on the verge of dropping out?

Don't think for one moment the media will EVER ask any questions like these. Since there is no evidence of wrong doing, I am going to sum it up like this. "If there isn't no stain, then it can't be Cain". Did you know that Sharon Bialek was at Teacon last month, and she hugged Herman Cain? Would any woman worth her weight in salt, hug and take a picture with a man she would one month later accuse of sexually harassing her 14 years ago?

Frankly, I have become tired of even commenting on this soap opera that really has become nothing more then a he said, she said event. Until evidence comes out by any of his accusers or Cain resigns from the race, this is nothing more then a stuck in the mud gossip tabloid story. I know people who don't like Cain would love to talk about this stuff all day long, but I am not going to play into it.

The fake 99 percenter Michael Moore didn't like the question he was asked about his own wealth.

2011-11-05T01:21:00.003-03:00

The truth to a progressive is like sunlight to a vampire. It never ceases to amaze how rich progressvies who are apart of the wealthy 1% try to sucker and con others into believeing that they are either looking out for the masses or are really apart of the 99% like the rest of the masses. Take Michael Moore for example. He's rumored to have a net worth of about fifty million dollars. He claims he is just like the average joe sixpack, but he isn't. That is apart of his con on gullible, naive progressives. He's made a good living at it, but the rest of us know he's as phony as a three dollar bill. Here is Moore being confronted by a reporter at an Occupy event. I don't think Moore appreciated the question very much.

Moore talked about he would like to be taxed more. He and most rich liberals like Warren Buffet are so fake, they are laughable at face value. Nothing is stopping Michael and Warren form opening up their checkbooks and cutting a check to the Internal Revenue Service, but they chose not to. Here's the reason why. They give the populous speech about them wanting to pay more in taxes, but they know that they will just find a tax loop hole in the tax code and then take advantage of it once they are done with their self glorification of themselves in the media spotlight.

Herman Cain talks to Laura Ingraham about Anita Gate v2.0

2011-11-02T11:19:00.008-03:00

Back during the time Bill Clinton got exposed with his pants down with his intern Monica Lewinsky, the left came to his defense in claiming that "it was just sex" and that "every president has had a woman on the side most notably John F Kennedy. The left claimed that the right impeached Clinton because of his affair with Monica, but the impeachment was a result of him lying under oath as president. Now with what I am calling Anita Gate v2.0, the left feels that they are in possession of a nuclear football on Herman Cain, and they are trying to spike it as hard as they can. The old saying goes is that all that shines isn't always gold. I predicted that this "controversy" was going to backfire on the left, and so far I've been proven right. Yesterday, Herman Cain's campaign had it's best one day online fund raising in the campaign's history raising over $400,000 dollars mainly due to conservatives solidifying their support and rallying around him over this so called controversy. I've talked to conservatives who were undecided about Cain just a few weeks ago, but now they are totally committed to him just because of this controversy. I have no doubt many undecided conservatives are also going to now back Cain just to spite the media and the left. I read a humorous story by the New York Time's Democrat hack liberal Maureen Dowd. Her column is entitled "Cain not Abel". I'm sure that if she was asked would she vote for Bill Clinton if he was able to run for a third term, her answer would be an enthusiastic YES. Progressives believe that if they can simply bog down Herman with the "seriousness of the charge" they can hurt him in the polls. I don't see it playing out like they hope it will. Unless it is proven that Herman Cain had some sort of a sexual encounter with any of these two women, I see this story blowing over in two weeks tops. If this turns out to be a story about a candidate who DIDN'T cheat on his wife twelves years ago, it should be smooth sailing for Cain going forward until the next controversy by the left. The left is trying to make an issue about Herman Cain "changing his statements from events that happened twelve years ago. If that is some sort of smoking gun evidence of guilt, then I must be guilty also, because I can't remember what I did twelve years ago unless I stress my brain to remember. Herman was on Laura Ingraham's show yesterday talking about Anita Gate v2.0. As I said, the left better come up with some sort of sex tape of Herman Cain with any of those two women, if they want this so called controversy to gain momentum and bring down Cain,

Herman was on the O'Reily Factor last night. This is why conservatives love Herman Cain, and this is why Cain's base isn't being eroded over this "controversy" but only getting stronger.

I've been in the political forums this morning, and I haven't heard much chatter among progressives in their continuous attacks on Cain over this story. I think I may have found out the reason why they have toned down their their attacks. Oddly enough, this story comes from the Politico. It must suck that they have to report what many conservatives already knew. IOWA YAWNS AT HERMAN CAIN ALLEGATIONS.

October surprise!!! The high tech lynching of Herman Cain has begun.

2011-10-30T23:23:00.008-03:00

This story by the Politico is like a time warp going back 20 years ago to 1991. Back in 1991 another conservative black man by the name of Clarence Thomas was accused by a woman "Anita Hill" of "inappropriate behavior towards her.

Her allegations just happened to come right before the conformation hearings, and Ms. Hill had to testify during the confirmation hearings. Surprise, surprise, surprise, nothing was proven from Ms. Hill's allegations. Clarence Thomas was confirmed to the Supreme Court, and the rest is history. It looks like the October surprise of rehashed dirty tricks may be at work yet again on another black conservative. The Politico is reporting that two women have come forward to accuse Herman Cain of "inappropriate behavior". I sigh laughing thinking about this. Every angle the left has tried against Cain has failed up until this point. They've attacked Cain's 999 plan, but it didn't hurt him in the polls. They've attacked him using the all predictable race card, that hasn't even worked. I guess the left is desperate and now have to double down on Saul Alinksy Jujitsu. The tactic now is going to be to destroy Herman Cain's character, and bog him down having him defend himself against "the seriousness of the charges" by these two women. The new media wasn't around during the time Anita Hill made her allegations, but they are now. If this is an orchestrated plan in order to take down Herman Cain, they will get to the bottom of it. The identity of these two ladies should be known if they are real, and the media should not be allowed to attack Cain on the charges of two women who can hide in shadows of anonymity.They might be made up figures of the Politico for all we know. I know how the smear game works with the media using "anonymous sources". That tactic has been used against Sarah Palin from day one. The Politico reported in regards to the Cain camp

"POLITICO has confirmed the identities of the two female restaurant association employees who complained about Cain but, for privacy concerns, is not publishing their names"

Privacy concerns? This is what I mean about being able to throw sharp darts from within the dark clouds of anonymity. I bet that within twenty four hours, the media is going to go into all out blitz mode with this story. Maybe they will call this pubic hairs version 2.0, 20 years later, who knows. Cain might be new to politics, but he made the right comment when confronted by the media after his Face the Nation appearance today. Cain said that he would not comment until " I see some facts or some concrete evidence.”

That is how you shut down the media's anonymity tactic. Demand that they put up the evidence first and then respond accordingly. I know the media is praying for a John Edwards, Gary Hart moment. As I read further into the Politico story, I found something interesting.

"There were also descriptions of physical gestures that were not overtly sexual but that made women who experienced or witnessed them uncomfortable and that they regarded as improper in a professional relationship."

So if the gestures weren't sexual, then what is the foundation of the allegations of inappropriate behavior? We'll see what comes from this and how Cain is able to continue going forward. The timing of the Politico bombshell is interesting. They released this story just 24 hours before Herman Cain is scheduled to speak in front of National Press Club tomorrow. What a coincidence.

Well at least it can't be said that the Occupy Denver folks aren't respectful of law enforcement.

2011-10-30T19:51:00.004-03:00

Tea Party folks need to take note. This is how peaceful protesters should act.

How nice of that protester to try and give that police officer a push. The officer was so appreciative, he tackled him to the ground in a show of gratitude. You trouble making Tea Party folks can learn from this guy on how to respect law and order.

Steven Crowder discuses "Occupy Racism".

2011-10-28T12:32:00.002-03:00

I have much respect for Steven Crowder for simply exposing just how idiotic and hypocritical progressives truly are. Progressives believe that if they can repeat something over and over even though they can't prove what they say, eventually people will just believe it just because of repetition. Of course in the real world, facts rain supreme in the validation of a person's claim about someone or group. The video I did a week ago about anti Semitic elements within the Occupy Wallstreet movement has now gotten over two thousand one hundred hits. Progressives don't like it that I've tainted their Occupy movement with the antisemitic broad brush the same way they have done with the Tea Party by painting the movement has being filled to the brim and overflowing with white racists. I was planning on doing a video on Herman Cain and the Tea Party this weekend, but Steven Crowder actually touched on some of the main themes I was going to use. I still might put it together next week if I feel it is necessary. Herman Cain is ahead in many polls mainly due to the Tea Party. Herman Cain is a Tea Party candidate. So why would white racist tea party folks overlook 8 white candidates running for the GOP nomination and decide to get behind the sole black guy who is actually blacker then Obama? Again, progressive logic isn't suppose to make sense to those who can actually think.

The Occupy Oakland movement is on the march or on the Chase.

2011-10-24T12:57:00.009-03:00

It looks like my Independence Day movie analogy describing the Occupy protesters may be closer to the truth then I thought. The Occupy movements around the country for the most part have been confined to their tent cities away from businesses and retail areas. Well now it looks like the occupy movement is no longer content with being isolated in just one place.The Occupy Oakland folks decided to take a little trip to a Chase Bank in Oakland. They weren't there to open a checking account in order to get a free toaster.

I'm sure Chase Bank is going to shut down their Oakland branch because of the actions of these protesters, NOT!! I can only imagine what the black lady sitting in the chair was thinking, when she saw those rejects coming through the door. The social rejects need to do some more research. JP Morgan Chase wasn't bailed out. They actually bailed out the brokerage firm Bear Sterns. Oh well, at least the grown up kids felt like their voices were being heard. So will this be the next phase of the Occupy moment, going into banks to protest? As the news cycle continues, the Occupy group gets less and less attention. So will they go to even more extremes in order to regain the headlines?

Does the Occupy movement represent the "majority of us" which are "99%"?

2011-10-20T10:55:00.002-03:00

I've watched the movie Independence Day several times over the years. It's a good flick. In the beginning of the movie, the alien's spaceships positioned themselves all around the global, and then initiated a countdown sequence to orchestrate their attack on the planet. I'm not going to compare the Occupy movement to the aliens in a movie, but I do have to wonder what exactly are their motives. The original theme of their movement was suppose to be about "Occupying Wall Street". Now, Occupy groups have sprung up all over the country like a cancer. Since the national squatting event has been going on for over a month, maybe people from around the country should take a good hard look into the mindset of the people taking a part in this movement and who are supporting their cause.

Some leftists have been trying to blow smoke up my rear end over the last few days by claiming that the Occupy movement really isn't a far left, anti American, anti capitalism movement. I posted a few days ago that the American Nazi Party has giving it's full support to the Occupy cause. I didn't mention also that the Communist Party U.S.A is also in full support of the movement . The CPUSA said on their website.

"This is an exciting time! Thousands of mainly young people have been occupying Wall Street for three weeks already, and the “Occupy Movement” has spread to more than 200 other cities. On Oct. 6 the actions spread to our nation’s capital."

"This movement, also known as the “99% movement,” is being hailed across the country. Movements and organizations are reaching out in solidarity. The AFL-CIO is opening union halls and offering other material assistance. Ordinary people are donating food, money and materials."

Don't be fooled for one second. This is a communist, anti Semitic, anti capitalism movement that is happening, and we all have seen and heard how these people think and act. We've seen the violence which took place in London back in August. Nobody is going to convince me that these radicals aren't capable of committing the same sorts of damage here if they don't' get their way.

The London violence by the bottom feeders all started with the same premise as the Occupy crowd, "economic inequality". So they attacked the mom and pop stores which didn't represent the "99%" in their eyes. In the video, you notice the young women saying that anyone who makes over $ 200k a year is considered to be in the 1%. I've never heard of a two hundred thousand dollar aire before. Make no mistake, these people in the Occupy movement are FLEAS..

(F)ree
(L)oading
(E)nenemies of
(A)merica

FYI: The Communist Party USA is holding a teleconference on October 25th to talk about ways to "build the 99% movement". See the enemy within for who they really are.

Herman Cain vs Bill Clinton 1994

2011-10-18T10:24:00.005-03:00

Herman Cain back in 1994 actually had an unformal debate exchange with then President Bill Clinton at a Town Hall event in which Clinton was stumping his (Hillary's) Health Care Bill. This is why progressives fear the living hell out ofHerman Cain winning the GOP nomination. This unknown man at the time took on with ease the President of the United States directly, confidently and without pause. Clinton by far is a much slicker politician and by far a more polished debater then Obama could ever be. So a Herman Cain vs Barack Obama debate would be Obama's and his supporter's worst nightmare come true.See for yourself.

This is why having a business man in the white house instead of another politician makes so much sense.

The American Nazi Party and the Occupy Wall Street protesters share something in common.

2011-10-16T11:42:00.010-03:00

Just like with the slogan from the old 1980's Wendy's "Where's the Beef" commercial, I've asked the left on many occasions to provide the beef aka evidence of racism from within the Tea Party movement. I never seem to get what I ask for. I'm actually use to it by now. Anyways, I've been reading stories about anti Semitic propaganda being spouted and displayed at the progressives Occupy Wall Street movement. I didn't expect the media to cover it if it was true, so I decided to do my own research to find out if there was validity to the chatter I've been hearing. In the back of my mind, I felt it would make perfect sense and only be natural that antisemitic vermin would be apart of the OWS crowd. Many on the left did call for and are still calling the Iraq War a "Zionist War for Israel". Over the years, I've seen the antisemitic signs from the anti war rallies in Berkeley and San Francisco. Berkeley and San Fran are no way considered right wing territory as most people know. I went ahead and put together a video from the footage at the OWS rallies and then added the footage from the anti Iraq War rallies, and I believe I made a compelling case on why antisemitism and progressives goes hand and hand based on the evidence.

Also the American Nazi Party has given it's full support to the Occupy Wall Street movement Oh well, Hitler was a member of the German National Socialist Workers Party, and he also hated Jews. I guess the ANP supports the OWS movement for the same reason that allowed Hitler to rise to power. They blame the Jews for all their own problems. Good luck waiting for the National Media to report the ANP endorsement of the OWS movement. Even the Israelis have noticed the anti Jewish theme of the OWS movement.

House servients Cornel West and Harry Belafonte try to whip Herman Cain with no success.

2011-10-13T10:23:00.003-03:00

Herman Cain was a guest on the Sean Hannity's Fox News Show the other day responding to the comments made against him by Harry Belafonte (one hit wonder from 60 years ago) and Cornel West (Marxist professor who still hasn't discovered a hair cut).

Ah, the Democratic establishment is going gonzo ape over the rise of Herman Cain. Out of the nine candidates running for president, the left is now squarely focusing it's racial laser beam on Herman Cain. I find it funny how the left has completely forgotten about Rick Perry. The whole niggerhead rock controversy lasted for a whole 48 hours. Usually the left doesn't bring out the race card unless they can get at a minimum of a week's worth of media play and fake outrage out of it. The reason why the issue died off so quickly is, because Rick Perry isn't at the top of the GOP pecking order anymore. Herman Cain is. Herman Cain is by far more dangerous to the Democratic establishment then all of the other GOP candidates currently running. I can't believe Harry Belafonte is still around after all these years. He had a one hit song back in the 1950's that most people of this generation don't even know about or even heard. As for Cornel West, this person isn't an intellectual dynamo as he perceives himself as being, even though he has spent all his life in the safe surroundings of academia. Cornel occasionally spouts his crazy, incoherent rants on cable news outlets like Fox and CNN from time to time. Even groundhogs have to come out of their holes once in awhile. This is my response to what Cornel and Belafonte had to say about Herman Cain.

Ah, one last comment. Cornel West is considered a "Civil Rights Activist". What exactly is the role of a "Civil Rights Activist" in 2011?

Witness the free thinking abilities of the Occupy Wallstreet Protesters.

2011-10-09T19:55:00.006-03:00

Progressives claim that they are by far smarter then a typical right winger. I've said as well as countless other conservatives that progressives can't debate, because they lack analytical skills in which to defend their talking points. Progressives have been called "mind numbed robots", and that tag actually applies with the progressive sheep who are occupying lower Manhattan and in cities across the country. When a person with a megaphone speaks, is it normal to reply in repeating what was said to comments that don't require an answer? I wonder am I missing something or are these people really that stupid or totally brainwashed?

Oh yeah, they didn't allow the black Civil Rights leader John Lewis to speak at their gathering. Imagine if that was the tea party who did something like that.

Martin Bashir and Goldie Taylor throw a hissy fit over Herman Cain not being "angry, assertive and agressive" for a black guy.

2011-10-08T10:44:00.005-03:00

Martin Bashir of MSNBC has some serious issues he needs to resolve in his head. This guy is so hard boiled on race, his brain cells pop like popcorn kernels whenever anything related to race, conservatives and the Republican party are mentioned. That actually describes MSNBC also. If anyone hasn't seen the attempted Pearl Harbor attack interview by Lawerence O'Donnell also of MSNBC on Herman Cain, I'll post it later for you all see. I hate repeating myself, but when I am right, I'm right. As I said, liberals despise, loath and are foaming at the mouth at the shear reality that Herman Cain is a black republican conservative and is getting so much attention and momentum. Martin Bashir on crack pipe MSNBC said

"The people that he's appealing to, the people that he needs to win over in order to win a primary, those people do not want to hear from a black man who’s aggressive, assertive, angry. They want to hear from a man who's assimilated, calm, measured. That's why he's [Herman Cain] doing it."

Listening to Goldie Taylor's remarks, I just wanted to burst out laughing uncontrollably. I figured the left was going to sink their teeth into the Perry hunting lodge story, however these are the same people who attacked anyone on the right for daring to utter a word about Obama for 20 years attending the Trinity United Racist Cult of Christ. When people brought up the issue about the church's black value system, Obama supporters said that the topic was irrelevant. If Rick Perry attended a church that followed a white value system, would it still be "irrelevant" to them? Many Americans are sick and tired of the issue of race being exploited and rubbed raw on a second by second basis by the left, and Herman Cain knows it. When real issues of racism is presented, let's talk about it and address it. What progressives keep harping on are issues of political expedience disguised as racism. Herman Cain wants to focus and talk about the issues facing America in 2011 while progressives like Martin Bashir, Goldie Taylor, Lawrence O'Donnell, Keith Olberman etc want to bog Cain down on stuff that is irrelevant to his candidacy in an attempt to turn off Cain's support base. This is the left's strategy against Cain. If Herman Cain was a copy of Obama in regards to ideology, Cain would be done right now as a candidate. Martin Bashir was right in what he said to a degree. The people Herman Cain needs to win over don't want to hear from an angry, assertive agrressive black man. It probably never dawned on Martin nor Goldie Taylor that is the reason why Barck Obama was able to have at one time broad based support among white Democratic voters. He didn't come across as "angry, aggressive and assertive" for a black man. That is why he was called the "magic negro" by David Ehrenstein of the LA Times. Obama succeeded where other Democratic candidates for president like Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Carol Mosley Braun and others failed. They were seen by moderate white Democrats as black militants, so they weren't taken seriously because of it. I wish I could ask Martin why should a black candidate by angry, aggressive and assertive in the first place. If white candidates for president don't come off like that, why should black ones? According to the latest Zogby Poll which came out yesterday, Herman Cain has a 20 point lead over Mitt Romney. Cain has accomplished this simply by being himself and sticking to his message and the real issues. The double standard by the left is clearly on display. Obama is considered "cool and calm" by the left, and they like that about him, yet they attack for not being angry, assertive and aggressive. Do these people truly understand how phony they are coming across to the rest of us?

Time to go slumming on Wall Street!

2011-10-07T10:32:00.006-03:00

Over the next few days, I'm going to be posting some videos of the bottom feeders of American society who are apart of the "Occupy Wall Street" movement. The national media of course love these folks for reasons that are obvious. I suppose the OWS crowd must be the left's version of the Tea Party. Since the Coffee Party never percolated with the American people, this must be their second attempt to create their version of grass root uprising. Like Cancer, the Occupy Walll Street parasites have spread out across the country, and they are now occupying sit ins in several cities. The media would have people believe that these are young people who have legitimate grievance with Wall Street and Capitalism in general. As with progressives, don't accept just what's appearing on the surface on the camera. The OWS folks are made up of hardcore left wing groups such as the Service Employee International Union (SEIU), MOVEON.ORG. Nancy Pelosi calls the protesters Spontaneous and Effective. All the protesters aren't protesting "Wall Street" though. As with all progressive rallies and marches, different groups representing different causes have come together to give the appearance that they are all apart of the same group fighting against Wall Stret, In other words, it's astro turfing 101. Since we all know progressives are the peace loving, compassionate, tolerant folks who embrace racial diversity and (conservatives are the opposite because progressives tell us so), lets meet some of the folks taking part in this great movement of the people and by the people. This is video of a young protester having a "friendly" exchange with an older Jewish gentleman about the protest. What could go wrong?

Steve Jobs RIP

2011-10-06T08:20:00.006-03:00

Innovator, Visionary, Entrepreneur, Trend Setter

Christiane Amanpour played Herman Cain like a violin.

2011-10-04T07:53:00.012-03:00

I have to be honest, and I am not going to candy coat what happened to Herman Cain, when he appeared the Sunday talking head show "This Week" hosted by Christiane Amanpour. Christine had Herman Cain on as a guest mainly to ask him about stories that have already been proven false, like the allegation that the crowd booed during the Fox-Google debate when issue of the repeal of don't ask, don't tell came up. Personally, I didn't see what the big deal was. Progressives are normally the ones who boo soldiers anyways. They've been known to do much more then just boo. A story came out over the weekend by the Washington Post reporting that the Rick Perry's family leased a hunting lodge decades ago that had a rock that read "niggerhead" on it. The Washington Post reported that the Perry's didn't put that name on the rock, and that the rock was painted over by the Perry's in 1983. This was the October surprise that really wasn't by the Washington Post. That didn't stop Christiane from asking Cain about the story while leaving out the all important detail about the year the rock was painted over.

In the Washington Post story itself, the reporter Stephanie McCrummen wrote

"Ranchers who once grazed cattle on the 1,070-acre parcel on the Clear Fork of the Brazos River called it by that name well before Perry and his father, Ray, began hunting there in the early 1980s. There is no definitive account of when the rock first appeared on the property".

That paragraph stated that the the rock was there before the Perry's ever leased the lodge.

Down near the bottom of the story. Perry was quoted in saying

"“When my Dad joined the lease in 1983, he took the first opportunity he had to paint over the offensive word on the rock during the 4th of July holiday,” Perry said in his initial response. “It is my understanding that the rock was eventually turned over to further obscure what was originally written on it.”

The facts didn't matter to Christiane Amanpour. The facts were right there in the Washington Post story to read. The rock was painted over in 1983 (27 years ago) and eventually turned over in order to hide the name. Why didn't she first interview Rick Perry on the rock isssue? This was no harmless misunderstanding on her part. She knew exactly what she was doing. It's no secret that the media would love to destroy Herman Cain and Rick Perry, because they believe Mitt Romney would benefit from it. The media knows Mittens is the weakest candidate to take on Obama, and they want him to be the nominee at any cost. Herman Cain's biggest asset is also his biggest liability. He isn't a politician. He isn't a political insider. Those are good qualities to have, but since he's a conservative and isn't media savvy, he unknowingly lent himself to being set up as a useful idiot like in the niggerhead rock "non story". Back in 2009, Rush Limbaugh gave the keynote address at CPAC. Michael Steele was just recently named the Republican National Committee Chairman a few weeks prior. Michael Steele was invited on the then D. L Hughley Show on CNN the day after Limbaugh gave his widely carried speech. Any conservative who knows the media would have put 2+2 together and would have known that the only reason Steele was invited on Hughley's show was, because Hughley was going to use the opportunity to try and play Michael Steele against Rush Limbaugh. To many of us, some things are just too obvious. To the then naive Michael Steele it wasn't.

and Hughley accomplished his objective hook, line and sinker.

It was so easy for Hughely to set up Michael Steele into attacking Limbaugh. A certain percentage of conservatives have this annoying habit of continuing to think that they are going to be treated fairly by the media if they go onto their shows for interviews. Herman Cain fell into the same trap Michael Steele fell into. This goes back to one of my original questions. If the niggerhead story was really a story worth reporting on, why didn't Christiane Amanpour invite Rick Perry on her show to talk about it instead of Herman Cain? It was the Perry family who leased the hunting lodge not Herman Cain. As for Herman Cain, he shouldn't have played the fool by answering her questions.because he followed the narrative she set in the time line that the rock was could have been painted over "recently", Cain now has come out and corrected what he said now "knowing all the facts" that the rock was painted over 28 years ago. If I was Cain and I didn't' know all the details of the story, the last person I would have relied on to feed me the information would be someone such as Christiane Amanpour . Herman went on Sean Hannity's program yesterday to claim that the issue is over in his book now that he knows all the facts.

The media isn't going to let this issue go as easy a Cain says he has. They smell blood and I wouldn't be surprised to see this issue at least in their eyes continue into the next GOP debate next week.
Since the debate is co sponsored by the Washington Post which wrote the story in the first place. I am willing to bet whoever the narrator is will bring this non story up again to try and but Cain against Perry in an attempt to create a negative racial dynamic to the GOP race. Time will tell whether Cain's comments will hurt him in the polls. If anything, someone within his inner circle better give Herman Cain a crash course on how and why the media isn't his friends and to be suspicious whenever they ask for another interview.

Is it possible to give Bill Maher a starter klanshood and cross?

2011-10-01T22:40:00.002-03:00

Bill Maher should consider listening to the Michael Jackson song "Man in the Mirror".

FYI on Herman Cain

2011-09-30T12:46:00.003-03:00

Herman Cain will be a guest on the Tonight Show tonight. I'm going to be watching, and I will probably comment on it. It will be interesting to see how he comes off in a casual interview setting with Jay Leno.

Crony Capitalism: A Concise History of Obama’s Solyndra Scandal

2011-09-30T12:13:00.005-03:00

Bernie Madoff is serving a 150 years prison sentence for defrauding investors out of billions of dollars. With Bernie, people entrusted their money with him believing he was going to invest their money in legitimate investments. Well they all found out that wasn't the case. He was using the money to pay for his well to do lifestyle as well as pay off earlier investors in an attempt to keep the Ponzi scheme going. The one thing about frauds is that eventually given enough time, they become exposed. Speaking of fraud, a Solar panel manufacturing company by the name of Solyndra went bankrupt and was also raided by the FBI two weeks ago. Some of you may be wondering what does that have to do with anything. Well, Solyndra was given a five hundred and thirty five million dollar loan. This loan wasn't made by banks or private investors, it was made by the Obama Administration. Sarah Palin brought up the issue about crony capitalism in her tea party speech in Iowa earlier this month. Tell me if what happened in the case of Solyndra smells like back door, Chicago style,wheeling and dealing, crony capitalism fraud. It smells like it to me. Since five hundred and thirty five million dollars of tax payer money has been in essence flushed down the toilet in this green "investment" thing, shouldn't people go to jail over this?

Janeane Garofalo: Racist Republicans Support Herman Cain.

2011-09-29T11:37:00.007-03:00

My timing is spot on as usual. I knew it wouldn't be long before Herman Cain would be targeted. Returning to the what I said in my last post about brainwashing, Janeane Garofalo is one of my favorite examples in illustrating how a racially brainwashed white progressive thinks. She's been spending a lot of time on Olby's show as of late. I guess since she doesn't really have much a career anymore, she has a surplus of time on her hands. This is Janeane on Keith Olberman's show discussing Herman Cain and what Sarah Palin said about his rise in the polls. Janeane went on to say the following

"Herman Cain is probably well liked by some of the Republicans because it hides the racist elements of the Republican party. Conservative movement and tea party movement, one in the same."

Funny she would say that, because a certain percentage of conservatives believe that white liberals voted for Obama mainly as a way to e sponge themselves of white guilt for slavery and the Jim Crow. Since white liberals were telling conservatives that if they didn't vote for Obama, the reason must have been, because Obama is black. Conservatives have a point. Getting back to what Janeane. I wonder could she explain what the Senate Democratic Majority leader Harry Reid meant when he said in a private meeting back in 2008. Why didn't he say that openly if he felt it?

" Obama had a good chance of winning acceptance among white voters because he was a "light skinned" African-American who had "no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one."

Riddle me this. Since the Republican Party doesn't need a large percentage of blacks in order win the presidency. Why would they need to "hide their racist elements" as Janeane Garofalo believes? This woman is an idiot who actually believes she's intelligent.

Herman Cain is stirring up Cain for the political establishment.

2011-09-29T10:29:00.001-03:00

After his surprise first place win the recent Florida Straw Poll, Herman Cain has now magically appeared on the national radar. I wrote when Cain first announced he was running for the Republican nomination that he better be careful in his quest. Progressives will do anything and everything possible to derail Herman Cain from gaining any momentum as a serious presidential candidate for one reason. He's black. I kind of sound like a progressive saying that, but we all know it's true. Progressives have spent too much time and effort over the decades to create a false premise that the Republican Party is the party of racism. It only stands to reason that if Herman Cain wins the GOP nomination, that illusion they worked so hard to create and enforce will have been destroyed. Blacks have been brainwashed for over forty years by the Democratic party and their black progressive allies about what the Republican Party platform is about. To blacks, they have been spoon feed such nonsense such as the Republicans want to return blacks to slavery and reestablish the era of Jim Crow etc. Herman Cain was on the CNN Wolf Blitzer show the other day talking about how" blacks have been brainwashed" to distrust the GOP and believe that they are the party of racism.

For ninety percent of blacks to vote Democratic without no clear and valid reason why over and over again doesn't spell logic to me. Last week, I heard the comments of Morgan Freeman saying that the Tea Party is made up of racists. Morgan is a classic case of a person being an ignorant fool, because he like many blacks "never seem to have FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE of what they regurgitate. Blacks who call the tea party racist never even been to one, that includes Morgan Freeman.

Maybe Morgan is still suck in the mindset of his role in the movie Driving Miss Daisy or something. I did a youtube video last year right after the GOP blowout in the mid term elections. In the elections Allen West, Tim Scott, Marco Rubio won their races.Nikki Haley won the Governer's race in South Carolina. I put out the question that if the tea party and the GOP is racist, how come racists voted for blacks, Hispanics and an American of Indian descent to represent them.

Brainwashing can't compete with cold hard facts. When people can't defend their claims about the Tea Party or Republicans being racists, they have no legitimate argument. Using the claims that the GOP is a racist party by the left, Michael Steele should have never been chosen as the Chairman of the Republican National Committee right? Would a black man be chosen to head up the Klu Klux Klan? The reason why blacks and progressives keep making everything about race is, because that is all that has been embedded into their brains to begin with. I know Herman Cain has been called an Uncle Tom, House Nigger, Simble Sambo, Token etc. He's been called and will continue to be called these names by the people on the left who claim to be about racial diversity. Notice however that it's the conservatives (the ones' progressives say are the racists ones) who are the ones "defending black and other minorities" who are conservatives. The same way progressives claimed that the "racist" GOP was trying to "copy" Obama with selecting Michael Steele as GOP Committee Chairman, they will definitely double down on the claim with Herman Cain. If the GOP is racist, why would they want to copy Obama? Don't try to figure it out. Brainwashing isn't suppose to make sense in the real world just to progressives.

It's now come to this. Even an ice cream cone is seen as being racist.

2011-09-27T10:59:00.008-03:00

I've used the term "racial crybabies" in the past to describe progressives who try to make the least little issue always about race. A better term would probably be "racial paranoid" These people from all races have racism on their brains from the time they wake up to the time they go to bed. Frankly, I'm surprised they don't refer tol god himself as a racist for making shadows black and night time black. In Ocala Florida, an Ice Cream Mascot is actually being mistaken by residents as a member of the Klu Klux Klan!! The kicker in this story is that the people who think the mascot is a Klansman, don't know that the owners of the ice cream shop and the man in the costume are Puerto Ricans and not white. and they've never even heard of the KKK until now. I need to do some research on the Klan to find out if any of their members have ever been known to wear sprinkles on their hoods. Maybe the gay ones do. I don't know whether to laugh at this story or shake my head in despair. People always ask me how am so rational as a black guy on the issue of race. For me, it's always been simple. I'm like Joe Friday on Dragnet. I only care about just the facts. Let's take the case of the big bad ice cream mascot as an illustration. Just using common sense, I know that a Klu Klux Klansman wouldn't be dumb enough to stand out in broad day light in front of a store in his klan outfit. Notice I said "using common sense". Speaking for myself, I would have seen the ice cream shop, looked at the guy and seen the costume and automatically put two plus two together and realized that the guy is dressed as an ICE CREAM CONE mascot!! The brown wafer cone as part of his outfit should have been a dead give away as well along him holding the sign that reads ICE CREAM!! Racially paranoid people tend to abandon logic and rely on emotion in their thought process. Because of this, this is why when they saw the ice cream mascot, they automatically seen him as a member of the klan and nothing else. What I really dislike about racially paranoid people is that they always try to influence others with their racially paranoid points of view. Two years ago, Dallas Commissioner John Wiley Price who is black got offended when Commissioner Kenneth Mayfield who is white referred to the budget as a "black hole" in a budget meeting. This goes back to I said early. Anybody with "common sense" knows what a black hole is and how the term can be applied to other situations. Mr. Wiley was an example of how racial paranoia can dumb down a person's thought process. The same applies to the people of Ocala Florida.

Obama tells the Congressional Black Caucus to "Stop mumbling, crying and complaining.

2011-09-27T10:40:00.002-03:00

I wonder will the Congressional Black Caucus ever realize that they are nothing more then foot soldiers for the Democratic Party and nothing more. They have no power and they have no influence within the party. They are in essence a black shell group with three letters on it's letterhead to make them seem more important then what they really aren't. Even Barack Obama knows this. That's why when he addressed the CBC as few days ago, he told them to take off their bedroom slippers and put on their marching boots. Obama has been criticized by the Congressional Black Caucus for ignoring them in the past. As Obama's soaring economy continues to impact blacks in record numbers, he's been silent on the issue, and that has caused blacks to actually start to question their support for him. Well Obama heard the "cries" of the CBC, but he didn't take responsibility for his policies having a negative impact on blacks. This is what his message to the CBC was instead. Besides telling blacks via the CBC to "stop crying, mumbling and complaining", he said he expect the CBC to march with him. Typical Obama, he wants his supporters to do for him, but he can care less about them. I've never known for Obama to say to his non black special interests allies to stop their complaining, mumbling and crying. I know he doesn't take that tone with his wealthy progressive friends at his $35,000 a plate fund raisers. I also know he doesn't say those words, when he's speaking at other special interest group gatherings. He said what he said in front of the CBC for a reason. He knows the blacks are his most die hard supporters, and he knows that he can talk trash to them, and they will still support him to the end. That was proven by the ovation he received as he was telling them to stop crying and complaining . Imagine if a Republican would have gotten in front of the CBC and told them that, even if the Republican was black. Flunkies are known for be accepting of verbal abuse as long as they like the person who is giving it to them. I can't say that all members of the CBC are flunkies in this case. One black progressive kook actually had enough sense for once to stand up and call out Obama for what he said. Maxine "tea party can go to hell" Waters wasn't clapping during Obama's scolding of the CBC , and she questioned his "choice of words"on the CBS Early Show. I can't believe I am in agreement with Kerosene Maxine. I suppose hell can freeze over for a minute or so. This is what Maxine doesn't understand. Obama and the Democratic Party know they will always have the majority of the black vote. By them knowing this, they know they will never have to do anything of substance to earn it. It's a known given by the party. Put it another way, "WHY DO THEY NEED TO BUY THE BLACK COW, WHEN THEY'VE BEEN GETTING THE BLACK MILK FOR FREE FOR OVER FORTY FIVE YEARS"? The Hispanic vote isn't a guaranteed lock yet as it pertains to the percentages that blacks vote Democrat, ,so the Democrats have to actually do things for them unlike with blacks. I wrote in a previous post what the Democratic Party expects of the CBC. Obama just came out and said.

Know their role aka "I expect you all to march with me"

Shut the hell up aka "shake it off, stop complaining, stop grumbling, stop crying"

Do what we say aka "take off your bedroom slippers and put on your marching shoes"

Progressives show their racist side after the release of the Joe McGinniss anti Sarah Palin book.

2011-09-24T14:51:00.013-03:00

I've noticed a racist pattern forming among progressives that they don't even realize they are exhibiting. Writer Joe McGinniss wrote an attack and smear book about Sarah Palin entitled "Searching for the Real Sarah Palin" that has just been released. The book has been a bomb in terms of sales. The book has been proven to have been made up of nothing more then tabloid gossip passed off as the truth by McGinniss. Joe McGinniss even admitted it himself to his publisher Random House back in January of this year. The book is so bad that even liberal media outlets such as the New York Time have come out and trashed the book's credibility. In the book, McGinniss wrote that Sarah Palin had sex with NBA player Glen Rice back in 1987. Ever since the book has been released, anti palin progressives have been going around saying that "Palin screw black guys". Even though what McGinniss wrote is a lie, it appears that progressives have a problem that goes beyond palin and has to do with interracial relationships. These are the people claiming that conservatives are the racists, yet it's progressives who are focusing on this one claim by McGinniss and are a reacting like a person of another race having a relationship with a black guy is so odd, "taboo" or a scarlet letter in 2011. For example here's uber progressive Bill Maher making a "joke" in saying that "Sarah Palin would screw Rick Perry if he was black".

Progressive are beyond quick to bring up the race card anytime someone questions Obama, yet look at their behavior in regards to this book. Even though the story is fake, what if it was true? Lets play devil's advocate for a moment. What if Sarah Palin actually had a relationship with Glen Rice prior to her being married to Todd Palin. Is there a controversy here? If Glen Rice was white, would it be a story? No, of course it wouldn't. So why is this tabloid story such a story among progressives? Barack Obama's mother was white right? I've noticed that progressives also go out of their way NOT to describe Obama as "bi racial", even though that is what he is. It's like his mother's white identity never existed. So once again, who are the ones acting like racists? While some in the media have actually called out Joe McGinnis for his tall tales in his book, others in the media are on Sarah and Todd divorce watch hoping and praying for it to be true. The lesson to take away from this is to don't believe progressives when they get on top of their soap boxes (which are actually on quick sand) and claim they "are the champions of DIVERSITY". It's a fools gold lie just like Joe McGinniss's book. Some progressives can care less that the book and the author's credibility has been shot to hell and back. All they care about is the "seriousness of the charge", so they can have another morsel in which to attack Sarah Palin and feed their obsessional and vile hatred of her. Case in point.

Mark Levin commented on the absolute sleaziness of Joe McGinniss's book and how fraudulent it truly is. It's a great listen.

MSNBC news anchor Thomas Robert : GOP candidates wish they could go back to the days when "slavery was cool"?

2011-09-24T09:03:00.006-03:00

Wow, did you all know that once upon a time "slavery was cool"? Seriously, can MSNBC still be classified as a news operation? I don't watch MSNBC for obvious reasons. I actually value the sources where I get my content from, but how can any person with somewhat reasonable intelligence continue to believe the insane rhetoric that is transmitted from MSNBC? MSNBC news anchor Thomas Robert who is an actual news anchor for MSNBC was interviewing a guest yesterday, and the topic was about Thursday night's GOP debate hosted by Google and Fox News. I've come to notice about progressives over the years is that the more they try to sound intelligent, the more they end up coming across as being absolutely ignorant and unhinged yet blissfully self contained in it.

During the two hour debate, maybe Mr. Thomas and his guest didn't realize that a black man and woman were actually in the debate. A black man "Herman Cain" and a woman "Michelle Bachmann" are running for the Republican nomination. I've watched every debate so far, and I have to ask this simple question,

"What beliefs or stances on legislation would have anyone believe that the GOP candidates for president would want to build a time machine and go back to the days when blacks were slaves and woman couldn't vote"?

I keep hearing the term "right wing extremists" from the left, but look where the extremist and kooky rhetoric always seem to come from. It's coming from the network of Al Sharpton, Ed Schultz, Chris Matthews and other radical progressives. If Robert and others believe that the GOP candidates are racists and sexists, why did MSNBC host the GOP debate a few weeks ago? Robert talked about ridiculous comments by the GOP candidates, of course he never gave any examples to validate his remark, but he should take a good long look in the mirror himself.

One-day rehiring nets former Chicago labor leader a $158,000 city pension.

2011-09-22T12:13:00.006-03:00

Oh how I despise municipal unions and their bosses, let me count the ways. Keep thinking that the municpal unions are working for you. This is a story of how a union boss in Chicago with the help of his city government crony friends was able to not only fleece Chicago tax payers but also was able to set the union boss up on easy street for life for just one day of work.

Emanuel Cleaver of the Congressional Black Caucus: If Obama wasn't president, we would be ‘marching on the White House.

2011-09-22T11:00:00.004-03:00

I really would like to thank Congressman Emanuel Cleaver of the Congressional Black Caucus for unknowingly exposing the truth about the Congressional Black Caucus. You see, the myth that has been created and circulated over the years is that the CBC actually is looking out for the concerns of black Americans. Thanks to Mr. Cleaver's own words, we now know that has never been the case. Mr. Cleaver said last week "If [former President] Bill Clinton had been in the White House and had failed to address this problem, we probably would be marching on the White House. I don';t believe that for one second." Since Obama is black and is a progressive, the CBC will do nothing more then continue to be the good subservient Democratic lap dogs they have been known to be. If the record high black unemployment rate of today happened under George W Bush, then and only then would we be hearing the yelling, complaining and attacks directed at the president. They wouldn't do it, because the black unemployment rate was at a record high. They would be attacking him based on him being "white and more importantly REPUBLICAN". The CBC can give a dam about blacks. It doesn't take a person with glasses to see the obvious. The only thing they've ever given blacks since their conception is lip service and more lip service. I talk about Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson being classified as race hustlers and poverty pimps, the Congressional Black Caucus is no exception. Blacks are nothing more then a vote for the Democratic Party and the CBC. It would be foolish to also think that the CBC would have dared to say an ill word towards Bill Clinton if the black unemployment rate was back then what it is today. In other words, they know their role and know when to speak. Obama isn't no different then any other person who has occupied 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, so why should he not be called out and held accountable for his economic policies negatively impacting blacks? Any Republican president would have been.

It's nice to know as black college graduates can't find a job, the Congressional Black Caucus will continue to turn a blind eye and not address the root cause of the problem because of the color of the person's skin and party affiliation.

This is why I have the upmost respect for Ford Motor Company.

2011-09-16T18:04:00.003-03:00

True capitalism is about failure vs reward. The possibility of failure keeps entrepreneurs humble in not taking miscalculated and excessive risks. Sometimes, businesses fail, because they aren't alert enough to see the blowing winds of change. In 2009, General Motors and Chrysler didn't move fast enough to restructure their business model and labor costs to meet the downturn in the automotive sales climate due to the souring economy. Because of their actions, they went to congress and Obama with their tin cans out looking for a bailout from the American tax payers. Ford took a different route. They aggressively cut costs and laid out the situation of the company to the United Auto Workers Union. The union took concessions to save their union jobs, and management was able to steer Ford back into profitability this year. Because the executives at Ford didn't go to Washington to be bailed out, Ford doesn't have any government owners of it's stock. Ford just came out with a new commercial that shows the main difference between them and their government owned rivals Chrysler and General Motors.

They're people who say that the bailouts of GM and Chrysler was not only a success but the right choice by Obama and the federal government. I guess is it worth it to save your life if it means selling your soul in the process? I believe Ford did it the right way, and I applaud them for it.

Keith "Olby" Olbermann explains who the real "terrorists" are.

2011-09-15T11:15:00.008-03:00

The definition of terrorism is defined as "The use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims". Coming off less then four days after the tenth anniversary of the 911 terrorist attacks on our nation, we still have a pretty good idea of what the acts of REAL terrorism looks like. Some people, however don't see things the same way as we see it. For example, here's Keith Olbermann aka "Olby", describing who he believes true terrorists are. If you're thinking he's going to mention actual terrorist groups like Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, the Taliban etc, you might be a tad disappointed. On a side note, I have to wonder why Olby is such a litter bug by shoving his papers off his desk? Aren't progressives suppose to be setting a good example for the rest of us great unwashed masses when it comes to taking care of the environment?

Yep folks, the Republicans and the Tea Party are the "terrorists". Citizens should fear "terrorists" who want our federal and state and local governments not to spend money it doesn't have, allow people to keep more of their own money and reduce excessive regulations off the backs of the job creators. Those "terrorists" are such extremists, aren't they? I guess Olby believes that that people who support tax cuts and less regulations are the equivalent to head cutters, and suicide bombers and such. This isn't really nothing new as some of you may know. Democrat politicians, and their media allies have been using the terrorist tag for over a year now in attacking the Tea Party and Republicans. These people have no shame. I'm just glad more people are starting to see how kooky and deranged these people truly are.

Are the real extremists in America on the left or the right?

2011-09-13T11:08:00.002-03:00

I don't need to go into how the Tea Party movement has been assulated and demonized by progressives. Tea Party patriots have been called everything from

hobits
racists
bigots,
extremists
terrorists
fringe
radicals
the mob
violent and on and on

Of course when push comes to shove, the left has of yet been able to provide any solid proof to even come close to making their Saul Alinsky bumper sticker attack slogans stick. Well since the left wants to create a mythical bogeyman out of the Tea Party, I thought it was only fair for me to collect some evidence about theillusion of the "peaceful, tolerant left" to put together a short video to show who the real "racists,bigots,extremists, terrorists,fringe, radicals, who use violence and act like mobs are.

The Civil Rights leader Al Shartpon tried to correct Herman Cain on the date of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. What could go wrong with that?

2011-09-13T10:51:00.006-03:00

Being that Al Sharpton is promoted by the left as a "civil rights" iconic leader of some sort, he had every right to correct Herman Cain, when Herman Cain said that "he was a product of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. There was only one small problem with the Civil Rights leader Al Sharpton correcting Mr. Cain about the date the Civil Rights Act was signed into law. Mr. Cain was right.

Sharpton isn't knowledge on current events, he can read a teleprompter and to top it all off, he thought the 1964 Civil Rights Act was signed in 1965! I'm sure MSNBC will start seeing those dividends from the investment they made in hiring Al Sharpton any time now.

Meet America's friends from 10 years ago on 911.

2011-09-11T12:14:00.008-03:00

When I saw Muslims celebrating 911 ten years ago, I was angry, but I knew that the world didn't share in their twisted sense jubilation. People from freedom loving nations came forward in the days that followed to offer their heart felt sympathy, compassion and solidarity with us. To the good people and our neighbors to the north in Canada and to the south in Mexico and people around the world who stood with us on that day and days that followed, thank you .

Compare that outpouring of sympathy ten years ago from freedom loving people to that of Msulim extremists ten years later. Nothing has changed. They are still the hate filled Islamic nut jobs from ten years ago who must be defeated.

Remembering the day of September 11th 2001 Part 1

2011-09-11T00:06:00.006-03:00

Any other first day of the NFL season, I would be cheerful and excited to watch my beloved Ravens play and also watch football in general. Today however, I won't be cheering nor celebrating like I normally do. Since opening day around the league falls on the 10th anniversary of 911, I can't help not to think that it would be somehow disrespectful to not fully remember what this day is all about. I love football, but football is just a game. Remembering 911 takes higher priority over that. I'll get back into football mode next Sunday, but this Sunday I just want to remember what happened ten years ago. I remember the events that happened just like it was yesterday. I was in my car coming home from a business appointment, when I heard the announcement over the radio that the first tower was struck by an airplane. I didn't think much of it at the time. I thought it might have been a small plane that crashed into one of the towers and then fell to the ground. When I got home and turned on the television just in time to see the second plane hit the south tower, I definitely knew wasn't the case.

I've always asked people on 911 where they were and what they were doing when they saw or heard what was happening. So if you care to share your experiences, please feel free. I was glued to my television for the rest of the day into the night. President Bush addressed the nation later that evening.

The saying goes "those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it". I can only hope as a nation we became stronger and wiser from that experience.

Remembering 911 ten years later: The enemies to America 10 years ago are still America's enemy to this day.

2011-09-10T12:34:00.006-03:00

Many are aware of the conflict in the Middle East between the Israelis and the Palestinians. Prior to the 911 attacks, I really didn't have an opinion one way or the other. To be honest, I didn't know much about what was going on in the Middle East at that time. I guess I was still somewhat naive to what was going on in the world. On the day of the 911 attack, I woke up real quick to the understanding of who are our friends in the world and who aren't. While most of the world extended their hand to the United States in sympathy, solidarity and support, certain countries and people didn't. Those were people who lived in Muslim countries. As I watched people on television crying over losing loved ones and just being in shock over what had just happened, I watched video on CNN and Fox News that changed my views on foreign policy forever especially when it came to who I support in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

No wonder Obama wants 911 to be about a "day of service", because if Americans remembered scenes like this from ten years ago, America as a nation would be that much more in support of Israel then it is right now. I hate to bring up politics in regards to 911, but something needs to be added. 911 was the biggest act of terrorism on the U.S homeland to date. When progressives including those in congress refer to the Tea Party as terrorists, they are desensitizing people to what TRUE terrorists are. The word terrorist should not be used by any politician or political pundit on either side of the aisle in regards to political issues that aren't terrorism based. I've been called "Islamophobic" by progressives over the years. Of course, I really don't take serious what a bunch of brain washed nit wits have to say about an issue they truly don't understand. On 911, I understood the fact that 19 Muslim Saudi hijackers were "Ameriphobes", they were taught at childhood to hate America, and they showed their hatred for this country ten years ago in a way that is still being felt to this day. Progressives never mention facts like that. In Muslim countries, Muslim clerics are brainwashing kids in the Muslim Arab countries to hate, and despise the United States", but progressives never condemn them just us for. The reason progressives don't criticize Muslims for their actions and anti western beliefs is due to fact that they both actually share a lot in commons. Both have a disdain for the state of Israel and both hate the United States. Progressives aren't the only ones who know how to burn an American flag.

Who said race hustlers can't be taken seriously?

2011-09-08T10:27:00.009-03:00

Only in America can a famous race hustler and racketeer who can't even pronounce the name correctly of the famous Italian physicist, mathematician, astronomer and philosopher Galileo can be not only given a political commentary show on television but actually be taken seriously as if he even knows what the hell he's talking about. I'll keep saying it. MSNBC is a joke for many reasons, and all of the them are obvious. This is the "good reverend" giving his two cents about the debate.

For this guy to even mention the words "fact check" is hilarious. I guess Mr. Sharpton believes he and people like him have more in common with the general public then Mr. Perry? Ah, the laughs never stop at Mess NBC.

MSNBC aired a SEIU attack ad during the GOP debate that MSNBC hosted.

2011-09-08T09:55:00.006-03:00

Why exactly did Republicans agree to attend a debate hosted by MSNBC is beyond my comprehension. MSNBC isn't exactly known as a legitimate news organization. This so called network has gone out of it's way over the year and to this day to falsely brand Republicans as racists, bigots etc. Hell, MSNBC even hired a black race hustler as a "political commentator". So it didn't come as a shock when during the last commercial break during the GOP debate hosted by MSNBC that this commercial aired.

Amazing isn't it? MSNBC sold air time to the Service Employee International Union, so they could air an attack ad on the GOP during their debate hosted by MSNBC. Who would have thought something like this could have happened on MSNBC right? I'm being sarcastic of course. I'm sure when the Republican National Committee and others found out about this ad, they must have felt like it was a Pearl Harbor sneak attack committed against the by MSNBC. It goes to the saying "know your enemies". The questions that needs to be answered are

1. Who at MSNBC allowed for that ad to air?
2. Who agreed to it at MSNBC?
3. Who at MSNBC sold SEIU the air time in the first place.

The only way this incident can be dismissed as a shear fluke is if the SEIU attack ad aired on other MSNBC programing and not just that one time buy spot during the debate. As well as I know MSNBC. I doubt that ad aired during other MSNBC programming.

So much for civility. Union Leader thug Jimmy Hoffa declares war on the Tea Party and refers to them as "sons of bitches".

2011-09-05T15:46:00.008-03:00

As I stated earlier, union labor in this country only presents 11.9% of the work force. Listening to Obama and Jimmy Hoffa speak, one would think that the majority of workers are unionized. Progressives have been the ones using the over the top rhetoric for as long as I can remember, yet they had the nerve to tell conservatives to stop with the violent rhetoric when Congresswoman Gifford was shot. Someone needs to tell that union boss thug Jimmy Hoffa to tone down his violent rhetoric towards the Tea Party.

So they want to "take those sons of bitches out" do they? It's always a recurring theme with these people. They always have to blame others for their own misfortunes. Union membership in America has been declining for decades, and the Tea Party had nothing to do with that. Morons like Hoffa can attack the Tea Party until he is blue in the face, nothing is going to change the continuous decline in the union ranks. The union drones in the audience can clap all they want also. In the end, the unions don't create jobs, they lose them. General Hoffa might want to rethink his battle plans if he is serious about wagging war on the Tea Party. The Tea Party ranks are growing while the union ranks are shrinking.

On this labor day, Obama is spending his time with people who do not represent the everyday working person.

2011-09-05T11:21:00.006-03:00

To all the producers out there, I hope you all have a very restful and joyful Labor Day. Go to the beach, have a cookout etc. Still having a job in which to celebrate labor day in this hope and change economy is reason enough to celebrate. To those who have lost their jobs this year and is looking for work, celebrate labor day, because you are still working hard trying to find a job. Speaking of jobs, the man who never held a private sector job in his life aka Barack Obama will give his "jobs speech" to the nation Thursday night in joint session to congress. It doesn't take a genius to figure out what he is going to say. He's going to double down on the previous failure ideas he tried before during his first "stimulus". He'll talk about the need to "invest" into the development of high speed rail and infrastructure aka shovel ready jobs v2.0. Speaking of the shovel ready jobs. Obama doled out over a trillion dollars of money we don't even have in the name of creating shovel ready jobs back in 2009 just to later admit and joked that "shovel ready wasn't as shovel ready as he hoped".

Some jokes are priceless and other jokes are worth a trillion dollars, and that trillion dollar joke was played on the American people. Anyways on this labor day, Barack Obama is spending the day with the union bosses and the rank and file at a rally in Detroit sponsored by the AFL-CIO and many, many other union organizations. The unions are claiming to be upset with Obama and the Democratic Party. I really can't imagine what more could the union porkers possibly want. Obama used tax payer money to bail out union jobs at Chrysler and GM. He used tax payer money in his porkilus to give to the states so that state union workers wouldn't be laid off. Pigs always want more and more and more. AFL-CIO president Richard Trumpka must be high on something or think he's fooling people who are much smarter then he is by claiming that they are going to build an "independent voice" separate from the Democratic Party. That's like the NAACP, the Congressional Black Caucus and other other black progressive groups saying they are going to build and independent voice separate from the Democratic Party. It's funny for Trumpka to say it, but most of us know better. Workers who are members of a Union only represents 11.9% of the U.S workforce, yet the vast majority of money that has been spent by Obama and Democrats from 2009 to 2011 went to their union allies and their causes. I've never liked unions, and I doubt I will ever change my feelings about them. I've seen how unions act, when they don't get what they want. The video of union members protesting at the Messmer Catholic school in Wisconsin is just one example. That is why I smile, when I hear about companies and small businesses deciding to relocate to right to work states. Their greed is their own undoing. The only labor force Obama loves is those who are unionized.

When the country is fifteen trillion dollars in the hole, what's another trillion in the name of "jobs"?

2011-09-04T21:05:00.005-03:00

A few weeks ago, Democrats actually tired to blame the Tea Party for S&P downgrading the nation's credit rating from AAA+ to AA+. The tactic fell on death ears with the public though. The nation is what created the Tea Party movement and elected Tea Party candidates to congress in the first place. We are fifteen trillion dollars in debt and climbing. The national debt is at one hundred percent of our Gross Domestic Product. The increasing debt is devaluing the purchasing power of the dollar. More dollars have to be printed just to pay the ever increasing interest payments on the national debt and by doing so is causing inflation which is hurting Americans across the nation. It has gotten so bad now; Americans are having to rely on credit cards just to bridge the inflation gap. So with all that being said, listen to what Maxine Waters said on Meet the Press today about government spending and jobs.

Remember once again, they claimed that the Tea Party was responsible for the credit downgrade. In reality and in living color, it was stupidity by members of congress who share this dim witted, ignorant moron's way of thinking is why our credit rating was downgraded. We need to spend a trillion dollars or more? I would say that Maxine Waters has lost her freaking mind, but that happened a long time ago, so never mind.

Congressman Allen West has second thoughts about being a memeber of the Congressional Black Caucus.

2011-09-04T20:15:00.006-03:00

It looks like Congressman Allen West is having a case of buyer's remorse for joining the Congressional Black Caucus. The CBC has been on an almost non stop mission as of late to attack the Tea Party at any given opportunity. The latest attack of course came from Maxine Waters, when she said to her devoted kool aid drinking drones that the "tea party can go straight to hell". Anyways, Congressman Allen West was a guest on the Thursday edition of Fox and Friends, and he was asked about the attacks by the CBC against the Tea Party.

Allen said all the right things during the segment by highlighting how the CBC has ignored the real problems facing the black community while instead deciding to focus their attention on the Tea Party which has nothing to do with any of them. How is the Tea Party responsible for the problems facing blacks in America? Blacks who had common sense in the audience of Maxine Water's event should have asked Maxine Waters how exactly is the Tea Party adversely impacting the black community. She would have been stunned in her inability to respond to such a question. I applaud Allen West for seeing the light about the CBC, but I have to scratch my head over one obvious question. Why did Allen West join the CBC in the first place? He had to have known that the group is nothing more then an ultra progressive auxiliary shill of the Democratic Party. I've known that fact for well over ten years. Conservatives of all races have also known that. If I was Allen West, and I was elected to congress, no way in hell would I even remotely entertain the notion of joining the CBC. I respect Allen, but he made a bad judgment call hooking up with those progressive loons in the first place. As for Congressman Carson, he might want to look in his own party, because I'm sure a certain percentage of socialist Democrats would also like to see him and other blacks hanging from trees. He obviously fails to understand that the only reason Barack Obama even won the Democratic nomination in the first place is because of basically what the Democratic Senate majority leader Harry Reid said "Obama was a light skinned person "WITHOUT" a "NEGRO DIALECT". With black progressives like Congressman Carson, the DDDD tactic always has to be used on blacks. Keep them Dumbed Down. Keep them Dependent and keep them voting Democratic. Here's another illustration of what I am saying. Here's Jesse "the married reverend who knocked up his secretary"Jackson referring to the modern day Tea Party to that of the Civil War confederate General Robert E Lee.

Was Maxine Waters dropped on her head at birth?

2011-08-31T18:37:00.002-03:00

Congresswoman Maxine Waters of California obviously isn't wrapped too tight upstairs. Maxine is simply a freaking loon. Last week while speaking to her ignorant constituents in her district in California, she made the statement that the tea party "can go straight to hell".

If Maxine isn't careful, she may be the one headed to hell before any tea party person.I believe she has more in common with the devil then anyone I know. She isn't exactly known as being a saint. It's surprising to hear a member of congress tell American citizens to "go to hell". I don't doubt that the elitists in both parties feel that about the tea party, but Maxine actually said it. I don't really hold much stock in what Ms. Waters says. She's an idiot. This is the same person who said back in 2005 "there is nothing wrong with Fannie Mae" as did other Democrats in congress at the that time.

If anyone believes that Congresswoman Maxine Waters doesn't believe in socialism, think again

It must be hard for Kerosene Maxine to keep under rap her socialist ways. So who are the extremists? Is the tea party who are the extremists or is it people like Maxine Waters? It's people like this is the reason congress has an approval rating of just twelve percent.

Wisconsin public union piggies protested at and vandalized a Catholic School in Wisconsin, because they don't like parents having "choice".

2011-08-28T12:13:00.008-03:00

Progressives support abortion through the narrative of "choice". That is one of the cornerstones of their warped ideological beliefs. It's such a shame however that they don't champion the parents of children who are born having the "choice" to send their kids to non union taught schools. The battle in Wisconsin between Governor Scott Walker and Public Union piggies is over, and Scott Walker was the victor. The porkers aren't going so quietly into the night with their heads between their legs. Apparently they haven't figured out that the party is over. They recently protested and vandalized Messmer Preparatory Catholic School on Friday. Yes, progressive public union turds vandalized a religious school. If you are saying to yourselves "do these people have any shame", the answer is no. Don't take my word for though. See for yourselves.

Remember when then candidate Barack Obama pretended to be a fiscal conservative hawk against Bush?

2011-08-24T21:06:00.008-03:00

No candidate can win an election telling the American people that he or she will run this country into the ground financially. Even Barack Obama knew that much.

Obama attacking Bush's overspending was easy.
Obama emulating and exceeding Bush's overspending was easy.
Obama being able to explain his massive overspending to bush's overspending isn't going to be so easy come next year. Here's a flash from the not so distant past. This video will be golden to whoever the GOP nominee is.

Nothing like memories rights? Can we also call Obama unpatriotic for running up the same amount of debt bush accumulated but in only two years and eight months? It's amazing how Barck Obama actually sounded like a Tea Party candidate. For that one brief moment in time back in 2008, Barack Obama actually shared the main theme of the Tea Party movement, stopping wasteful spending. We now know two years and eight months later it was clearly an act, but it was just eerie to hear Obama sound like a fiscal conservative hawk.

The intellectual lightening bolt Janeane Garofalo claims Herman Cain is a "paid token".

2011-08-24T01:12:00.016-03:00

I wrote back in May when Herman Cain announced his candidacy that the racially attacks by the left were sure to follow. I was proven right over the last few months leading up to the latest example. Out of the Republican field of ten candidates running for the GOP nomination, why is it that progressives seem so fixated on attacking Herman Cain based on his race? They aren't really concerned about his politics. Oh wait, they are concerned about his politics. It's not because Herman Cain's views are any different for the most part from most of the GOP field. The problem progressives like Jeane Garofalo have is that they believe Herman Cain has the wrong skin color to have them. So much for blacks being able to have freedom of choice in this country. Last week, the washed comedian, failed actress and radio talk show host was a guest on Keith Oblerman's show on the Current cable channel. Current is Al Gore's little project, and I do mean little. It actually has fewer viewers then MSNBC. The progressive princess of skank made a deranged claim that Herman Cain is a "paid token" in the GOP race.

Herman has a touch of Stockholm Syndrome? I guess she believes that Herman Cain has a touch of Stockholm Syndrome simply, because he's not kissing her progressive or any progressive's ass. The woman is obviously meanly ill as a lot of progressives tend to be. Herman Cain is already a successful and rich person in his own right, and it just goes to show how progressives think about blacks and other minorities who don't subscribe to their way of thinking. It doesn't matter to Jeane Gerafalo what Herman Cain has accomplished in his academic and business background. That's irrelevant to her. All she knows is that Herman Cain like Michael Steele and others like them are "BAD NEGROS" who don't know their role. Speaking of Michael Steele, Jeane originally used her Stockholm Syndrome smear in addressing him back in 2009, when Micheal was first confirmed as the Republican National Committee Chairman.

Think of the irony in all of this. This is the same sad excuse of a human being who calls the Tea Party folks racists? Jeane needs to be surrounded by a four way mirror so that she can come face to face with who the real racist is. As she said

"Michael Steele and other black Republicans are self loathers with "Stockholm Syndrome" and "He tries to curry favor with the oppressor".

To people like Garofalo, black people are self loathing if they aren't monolithic in their thinking in showing undying loyalty and support towards people who think like her. In other words, progressives really only claim to care about minorities as long as the minorities know their role in who they support. I've always wanted to debate that kook just for the shear hell of it. I would bury her in her own ignorance and then jump on her grave for good measure. . Maybe Jeane can get treatment from Dr. Zo for her severe case of PRD "Progressive Racism Disorder".

Can anyone imagine what the response would have been if a well known white conservative would have said that Barack Obama was a paid token in the 2008 Democratic Primaries or Carol Mosley Brown was one in the 2004 Democratic Primaries?

Chris Matthews refers to Governor Rick Perry as "Bull Connor with a smile"

2011-08-22T10:22:00.008-03:00

I'm convinced that many progressives are seriously mental ill. Some on left use race as a ideological and political weapon against the right and people who don't agree with their agenda, while others on the left truly buy into their racial paranoia. I can't really peg what side of the racial ledger Chris Matthews is on. He could be both a racial manipulator and a racially paranoid kook. He along with other progressives tend to have a habit of referring to modern day Republican conservatives to that of "Bull Connor". For those of you who might not know who Bull Connor was. This is the legacy of Bull Connor.

As history shows, Bull Connor was an unapologetic Democratic racist who lived during the Civil Rights era. Chris Matthews said on his show last week that Governor Rick Perry of Texas is "Bull Connor with a smile".

Only a kook or a person ignorant of history would even entertain what Chris Matthews said as being factual in his comparison between Governor Perry and Bull Connor. It's the over the top delusional sensationalism like what Matthews does on a daily basis is why many people see progressives as the kook fringe that they are. First it was Ed Schultz of MSNBC actually deceiving his own viewers just to try and brand Rick Perry as a racist. Now it's Chris Matthews ALSO OF MSNBC with with the laughable comparison between Rick Perry and Bull Conor. Chris has always been good at using the eye popping headline slogans like "Rick Perry is Bull Connor with a smile", however, Chris can never backs up his headlines with the body of facts! How is Governor Rick Perry similar to Bull Connor on the issue of race? If Chris Matthews was asked that simple question, he would do everything in his power to try and change the topic. When the facts are presented, there is clear "contrast"between Rick Perry and Bull Conor not any "similarities".

Did Rick Perry enact Jim Crow laws in Texas? No
Has Rick Perry as Governor support any legislation harmful to blacks? No
Has Rick Perry called for racial segregation in Texas? No
Has Rick Perry ordered the use of any local or state agencies to use water hoses on black Texans? No
Has Rick Perry ordered the use of Police Dogs on blacks? No

Once again Mr Tingles is playing fast and fancy free with the truth. What else is to be expected from Chris Matthews and MSNBC, the truth?

Obama should have stopped in Atlanta during his jobs bus tour in order to come face to face with reality.

2011-08-19T10:12:00.008-03:00

If pictures are worth a thousand words, then video should be worth a million. While Obama vacations in Martha's Vineyards for the next ten days without a care in the world, this is what is happening to the "other people" in the real world. Instead of "hope & change", it's become "hopelessness & despair".

It must be nice for the Obamas. While millions of Americans are without a job, losing their homes, using their credit cards in order to trying to just survive, the Obama's can live it up in luxury in their $60,000 a week rental in Martha's Yineyard while others try to figure out how they are going to put food on their plates tonight.

Obama's Greyhound One jobs bus was made with pride, just not in America.

2011-08-18T09:51:00.007-03:00

What's more American then an American president riding on his jobs tour bus through the midwest talking about creating American jobs right? Well, let's talk about that bus for a minute. It's been dubbed "Greyhound One".

Obama's ride definitely suits him well. It's uninspiring and dreary looking. Some people have referred to it as a huge funeral hearse. Since so many people believe the jobs market is dead anyways, the look of Obama's ride might be appropriate after all. Anyways, with more then fourteen million people out of work, Americans can take pride in knowing that Obama's misery tour bus was manufactured NOT in the good ol U.S.A. Obama's motor coach was manufactured in CANADA!!!! So why did Barry give those jobs to the Canadians instead of Americans"? Another question that needs to be answered is "How can anyone be so stupid"?! For Obama to ride around the country talking about jobs in his Canadian built motor coach is as naive and clueless as say a person claiming to be an environmentalist owning and driving up to an environmental protest rally in a gas guzzling GMC Yukon SUV!!

Even Jon Stewart is now goofing on Ed Schultz for his editing hit job on Rick Perry.

2011-08-18T01:05:00.004-03:00

I gave up trying to figure out Jon Stewart a long time ago. Even though Jon is a solid progressive comedian, he isn't a far out loon bat like Bill Maher. Even Jon Stewart belives Ed Schultz is way off base in his assertion that Rick Perry was referring to Barack Obama, when he used the term "black cloud".

When a progressive comedian uses another progressive as comedy material, it;'s a good sign that the progressive target truly stepped in it to warrant the humiliation and ridicule. Now that's funny!!

Ed Schultz gets busted editing the video of Rick Perry's speech in an attempt to brand Perry as a racist.

2011-08-17T01:14:00.008-03:00

When will these kooky progressives clowns ever learn that they can't fool people who are smarter then them? I should have known that it wouldn't have taken forty eight hours before some mind flush over at MSNBC would try to smear Rick Perry as being some sort of racist. That is their only arsenal they have at their disposal as we all know. Progressives are scared to death of Perry's candidacy for some reason. Maybe they know deep down that under the right circumstances, Rick Perry will slaughter Obama if he wins the GOP nomination. Be that as it may, what Ed Schultz did was beyond scummy even for a person like him. On tonight's "The Ed Show" on MSNBC, Ed Schultz admitted he was in error in deceptively editing a clip of Gov. Rick Perry, removing the meaning and context of the governor's statement. The deception was first revealed at Breitbart.tv. The reason Ed admitted the "error" is, because HE GOT CALLED OUT FOR DOING IT, not because he knew what he did was wrong.

So why didn't Ed use the full clip the night before to put what Perry said into it's proper context? As I said before, Ed Schultz knew full well what he was trying to do. This isn't the first time that a host of an MSNBC show used an edited clip in an attempt to create a bogus narrative depicting conservatives attacking Obama because he's black. Contessa Brewer back in 2009 reported on the health care summit in Arizona where Obama spoke at. The cameraman for MSNBC filmed a man from the waist down who was carrying an AK 47 assault riffle with him. In Arizona it is legal to carry around guns in the open. Anyways, the race of the man with the riffle wasn't shown by the camera man. I did a video edit project shortly after to expose how fraudulent the reporting of MSNBC was. At the 52 second mark in the video I created, it will be clear to anyone watching why what Ed Schultz tried to do to Perry wasn't no accident, it was deliberate.

Even while giving a fake, half ass apology, Ed still manages to make a horses ass out of himself like only he can do it. Where's Media Matters?

Flash Mob help themselves to "free stuff" in Maryland 7-11

2011-08-15T12:41:00.006-03:00

I guess I should be PC in what I am about to say. A flash mob didn't happen yesterday in my state of Maryland in Germantown in Montgomery County. It was simply yet another large group of black teens who organized before hand to go into a seven eleven and shop without paying for the stuff they took. How was that?

The scenario of the story would have been way different if the owner of the seven eleven would have decided to confront the little darlings with a gun and lock the door. By him doing nothing, it's pretty much a guarantee that his store will be targeted again, because the hood rats know he is an easy mark. Maybe instead of calling these crimes "flash mobs", maybe they should be called "kinetic wealth redistribution initiatives". Has a nice sound to it doesn't it?

CNN reporter Don Lemon the plays race card against Herman Cain in Iowa.

2011-08-13T11:47:00.004-03:00

Do you all remember when a CNN reporter asked then candidate Barack Obama back in 2008 before the Iowa Ames Poll could Obama win the Democratic Nomination in a mostly white party in a mostly white state? If you are having a hard time remembering such an exchange, it's a good reason why you don't remember it. It never happened. Progressives in the media would never under any circumstances use the race card against a fellow progressive in regards to the Democratic election. Since Herman Cain is a conservative Republican running for the GOP nomination, CNN has no problem using the race card against Cain, the GOP, and the state of Iowa. Here's CNN "reporter" Don Lemon asking stupid questions to Herman Cain about whether "he can win in a mostly white party in a mostly white state".

Contrary to what progressives and other Democrats would have people to believe. The Democratic Party is a MOSTLY WHITE PARTY due to the fact that blacks in United States only make up 13% of the entire population. Even though most blacks are affiliated with the Democratic Party, they are nowhere near being the "racial majority" of the party. That simple facts seems to elude them for some reason. Mr. Lemon should have used his brain before asking Herman Cain those questions. If he did, he would have realized that Barack Obama as a "black" person beat out a Democratic field of candidates who were all white, in the state of Iowa. This was clearly an attempt by Mr. Lemon to try and paint the Republican Party and the Republican Iowans as being racists who would never vote for a black person for the GOP nomination. Here's an interview from yesterday of radio talk show host Michael Savage interviewing Herman Cain. It was a good interview. Maybe Don Lemon could learn a few pointers on how to do his job the right way.

Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter takes aim at black flash mobs and their parents.

2011-08-12T21:22:00.007-03:00

Maybe all black liberals don't think a like after all. I never would have pegged Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter as being strict on cracking down on marauding black teens in his city. Progressives aren't really known for being tough on crime. Normally they tend to just blame the teens surroundings as the problem. Progressives somethings come to the conclusion that I just single out blacks for the hell of it in order to trash them. That's not the case at all. I just refuse to stick my head into the ground and pretend reality isn't going on around me on a daily basis. I don't excuse bad behavior. It's nice for once to see and hear a prominent black progressive actually lay the record out straight in not defending bad behavior by black youths. Mayor Michael Nutter spoke last Sunday at his church Mount Carmel Baptist Church about the plan his city is going to implement to combat the black flash mobs terrorizing his city. He also pointed out that many problems that face black teens are problems they bring on themselves through their own self destructive thought patterns and behaviors. It was refreshing to hear another black person tell the truth instead of trying to hide the real problem facing young black people in America. Thank You Mayor Nutter. I can only hope black teens who are apart of these flash mobs heed his words. I highly recommend everybody watch Mayor Nutter's speech in it's entirety to truly understand how significant his speech was.

FYI: Michael Nutter is friends with the Obama's. It's amazing how two people who are friends with the same way of thinking can in other ways be completely different.

Black teen flash mobs are racist in nature, so why aren't they being reported as such?

2011-08-11T13:20:00.000-03:00

If you've been watching the news coverage from the national media, chances are you haven't heard one thing about the crop of racially motivated flash mob attacks that have been happening recently. A week ago, a large crowd of black youths targeted and beat up white patrons at the Wisconsin State Fair.

Some in the media who are sparsely covering these events are claiming that these flash mob attacks are being committed out of "economic necessity". In other words ,the economy is making them do it. Leave it to progressive thinking to once again excuse bad behavior.

These attacks didn't start this year. They've been happening for several years now. Here's a story of a white family jumped an beaten just last year in Akron Ohio.

The attacks are clearly racially motivated. It's pathetic that I have to do the job and report what the national media won't report. They don't want to report what the red blazing neon sign in the room reads, the teenagers committing these racial attacks are "BLACK"! If the roles were reversed, the media would be tripping over itself to report that fact that the attackers were white and that the attacks were "hate crimes". The media is continuing to give people a valid reason not to trust their reporting. I've been trying to put my finger on what is the fuel for these flash mob attacks, and I can't think of a logical reason. The NAACP and the Urban League have been silent on this. The race pimps are nowhere to be found. I guess Sharpton is still trying to master reading words off a teleprompter or something. I predict things are gong to escalate if these flash mobs continue. A black flash mob teen is going to eventually attack a white person who is carrying a gun for his or her protection, and that white person is going to use it and kill that black teen attacker. Then and only then will the media, the race hustling industry actually speak out, but they won't speak out like one would think. They will attack the white person who shot the black teen in self defense. Ignoring this problem won't make it simply go away. The attacks are getting bolder and more frequent, and it's just a matter of time before the powder keg blows. In the back of my mind, I wonder are these black teens attacking whites, because they somehow in a warped way feel empowered, because Barack Obama is president. I don't tolerate racism regardless. The same way whites who attacked blacks during the civil rights era and pre civil rights era was barbaric and immoral, it doesn't make it any less barbaric and immoral for black teen to act in a similar fashion toward innocent white people. It's an embarrassment, and this type of behavior needs to stop!

Obama our historic president made history for being the first sitting president to reside over the lowering of our once AAA+ credit rating.

2011-08-07T23:31:00.001-03:00

What president wouldn't want that "honor" on their resume right? I guess that's just one more accomplishment Obama can run on in his campaign next year. Even though the bill that made Standard & Poors lower the country's credit rating was a bi partisan bill, if Obama, Pelosi and Reid wouldn't have spent five trillion dollars from the time Obama was sworn in up until now, our country would still have it's triple A credit rating from S&P. That is just a fact. I blame Republicans as well for the downgrade. They don't get a pass on this either. As you all know, I am a conservative not a party hack like some are. Besides the actual debt itself, compromise is what ultimately lead to the downgrade. Republicans had the mandate to push forth with huge and actual cuts to the government's spending. John Boehner and Mitch McConnell negotiated that away. What did they do instead? They "compromised", when they were in the position of strength. This is a quick video I did Friday night right after the downgrade was reported.

I won't be surprised to hear from Obamatrons that the reason Standard & Poors lowered the nations credit rating was, because Obama is black. I know how these kooks "think", so would it really surprise you if they didn't try to use that excuse? So because of reckless spending and compromising on not really addressing the problem of spending, Obama and others are actually trying to point the finger at Standard & Poors!! S&P didn't run up five trillion dollars in debt in two years and seven months, and Standard & Poors didn't turn an annual deficit of four hundred billion a years under the last term of Bush to one point six trillion as it currently stands under Obama. Also, progressives are trying to blame the Tea Party of all people. I know it's beyond irrational, but the porkers in congress need a scapegoat, and for progressives the Tea Party caucus is it. Here's John "I spent Christmas in Cambodia" Kerry trying to lay the S&P downgrade at the feet of the Tea Party Caucus.

The Benny Hill show of progressive comedy continues. Now progressives are actually trying to reassure investors after the S&P downgrade. They want investors to keep wasting their money buying debt that has an increasing chance of not ever being repaid. So lets recap, the Tea Party is being blamed even though they weren't even around prior to this year, the Republican leadership is spineless and Obama doesn't have a clue that actual tax payers are the ones on the hook for his drunken socialist spending.

Chicago White Sox player Ozzie Guillen tells a reporter how he "really feels" about actor Sean Penn.

2011-08-05T17:44:00.005-03:00

Ozzie Guillen is a native born Venezuelan, and he doesn't think very kindly of the foreign dictator's favorite useful progressive idiot Sean Penn. The reason why Guillien isn't keen on Penn is, because Sean Penn is going around giving the false impression on how great the country of Venezuela is. The problem with Sean's assertion about Guillien's home country is that Sean has come to his conclusion from his grand guided tour of the country by Hugo Chavez and his cronies. Ozzie Guillien knows the "real Venezuela". He knows all about the poverty and lower standards of living under Hugo Chavez. It's hard not to understand why Ozzie Guillen sees Sean Penn as a loser. I would add the word clueless in front of loser.

If the interview he had with the reporter was no holds barred, I'm more then certain Ozzie would have had some real harsh words for Sean Penn. Progressives are really clueless people, yet they claim to be so smart. People like Michael Moore go around giving the false impression that the Cuba is some grand paradise with state of art health care. Michael Moore stupidity about Cuba was spoofed beyond perfection in the movie "An American Carol".

Progressives can't even tell the truth about the greatness of America, so why would it come as a surprise they would tell the truth about other countries that aren't friendly to America and are much worse off?

What's the difference between squirrels and nuts and power drunk politicans stealing your tax dollars?

2011-08-04T21:03:00.006-03:00

Squirrels aren't manipulating, lying, power hungry politicians.

11 year old girl saves a woodpecker, yet her mom now faces a $500 fine and possible jail time for her daughter's actions.

2011-08-02T11:49:00.009-03:00

I know, something doesn't sound right with that headline. Tell me again that the federal government isn't drunk with power. In Virginia, an 11 year old girl did a good deed by saving a helpless woodpecker from being eaten by the family cat, yet this is a story of how a good deed didn't go unpunished by the long arm of our benevolent, overpowering federal government.

Sarah Palin responds to the Vice President calling Tea Party patriots "terrorists".

2011-08-02T11:11:00.003-03:00

The definition of a terrorist is: "A person who uses terrorism in the pursuit of political aims." Joe Biden is in real life what progressives try to present Sarah Palin as being. Joe Biden is a clueless, bumbling, pathological lying, dunce. Biden is that crazy uncle the family locks upstairs in the attic out of fear of being embarrassed by his behavior when company comes over to the house. I've heard many disrespectful names used against the modern day tea party by progressives and the republican elitists since coming onto the national scene in 2009. None of the names have stuck of course. If anything, it only made the people who made the comments towards the tea party appear like the true fanatics and kooks they tried to paint the tea party as being. Joe Biden called the Tea Party members yesterday "terrorists" in a closed door meeting. Joe is the Vice President of the United States. The man who is second in command of this country refereed to the people who are trying to stop congress and the president from financially wrecking this country beyond repair as "terrorists". I'm not going to try and rationalize insanity. It's beyond bizarre that the people who are advocating the country spend more and more money it doesn't have and raise the debt ceiling to cover it are seen by the media, the republican establishment and progressives as being the "normal and rational ones". Sarah Palin responded to the comments by Joe Bidden yesterday, and she took to task what Biden said.

Contessa Brewer embarrassed herself while trying to upstage and embarrass someone else.

2011-07-31T14:57:00.007-03:00

Contessa “white people showing up with guns” (insert cropped footage of black man with rifle) Brewer" made a fool out of herself yet again on MSBNC a few weeks ago. Contessea Brewer is a joke of a journalist on the channel that hired Al Sharpton. She hilariously made an absolute ass out of herself in an interview two weeks ago trying to upstage Republican Congressman Mo Brooks from Alabama on the issue of whether the bailout was needed back in 2008.

Poor Contessa didn't do her opposition research into the background of Mr. Brooks. Mo graduated from Duke University in three years with a double major in political science and economics, with highest honors in economics. In 1978, he graduated from the University of Alabama Law School." Look before you leap next time Contessa, like that is going to happen.